Evaluating Community Detection Algorithms for Multilayer Networks: Effectiveness of Link Weights and Link Direction

IF 0.5 Q4 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Daiki Suzuki, Sho Tsugawa
{"title":"Evaluating Community Detection Algorithms for Multilayer Networks: Effectiveness of Link Weights and Link Direction","authors":"Daiki Suzuki, Sho Tsugawa","doi":"10.25088/complexsystems.32.2.211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analyzing the structures of multilayer networks (MLNs) has been a hot research topic in network science. Community detection algorithms are important tools for analyzing MLNs. In the literature, several community detection algorithms for MLNs have been proposed. Moreover, there are several options for the graph representation of an MLN: for example, directed or undirected, weighted or unweighted, and using information from all or only some layers. Although these options may affect the results of community detection in MLNs, representations that are effective for community detection have not yet been clarified. In this paper, we experimentally evaluate the effectiveness of three types of community detection algorithms for MLNs and examine how the graph representation of an MLN affects the results of these algorithms. Our main findings are as follows: (1) The flattening approach is particularly effective, whereas the layer-by-layer approach is not applicable to detecting communities in MLNs of Twitter users. (2) Using a directed graph for each layer of an MLN increases the accuracy of community detection. (3) The Leiden method, which is a community detection algorithm for single-layer networks, achieves comparable accuracy with the community detection algorithms for MLNs, which suggests that there exists room for improvement in multilayer community detection algorithms for effectively utilizing the multilayer structures of MLNs.","PeriodicalId":46935,"journal":{"name":"Complex Systems","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complex Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25088/complexsystems.32.2.211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Analyzing the structures of multilayer networks (MLNs) has been a hot research topic in network science. Community detection algorithms are important tools for analyzing MLNs. In the literature, several community detection algorithms for MLNs have been proposed. Moreover, there are several options for the graph representation of an MLN: for example, directed or undirected, weighted or unweighted, and using information from all or only some layers. Although these options may affect the results of community detection in MLNs, representations that are effective for community detection have not yet been clarified. In this paper, we experimentally evaluate the effectiveness of three types of community detection algorithms for MLNs and examine how the graph representation of an MLN affects the results of these algorithms. Our main findings are as follows: (1) The flattening approach is particularly effective, whereas the layer-by-layer approach is not applicable to detecting communities in MLNs of Twitter users. (2) Using a directed graph for each layer of an MLN increases the accuracy of community detection. (3) The Leiden method, which is a community detection algorithm for single-layer networks, achieves comparable accuracy with the community detection algorithms for MLNs, which suggests that there exists room for improvement in multilayer community detection algorithms for effectively utilizing the multilayer structures of MLNs.
评价多层网络的团体检测算法:链路权重和链路方向的有效性
多层网络的结构分析一直是网络科学研究的热点。社区检测算法是分析mln的重要工具。在文献中,已经提出了几种针对mln的社区检测算法。此外,MLN的图表示有几种选择:例如,有向或无向,加权或未加权,以及使用所有或仅使用某些层的信息。虽然这些选项可能会影响mln中社区检测的结果,但对社区检测有效的表示尚未明确。在本文中,我们实验评估了三种类型的MLN社区检测算法的有效性,并研究了MLN的图表示如何影响这些算法的结果。我们的主要发现如下:(1)扁平化方法特别有效,而逐层方法不适用于Twitter用户mln中的社区检测。(2)对MLN的每一层使用有向图,提高了社区检测的准确性。(3) Leiden方法是一种针对单层网络的社团检测算法,其准确率与针对mln的社团检测算法相当,说明为了有效利用mln的多层结构,多层社团检测算法还有改进的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Complex Systems
Complex Systems MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信