Meta Analysis – Effect of Occupational Noise on the Risk of Hypertension and Noise Induced Hearing Loss in Industrial Workers

Ila Izzatus Salamah, Sumardiyono Sumardiyono, Bhisma Murti
{"title":"Meta Analysis – Effect of Occupational Noise on the Risk of Hypertension and Noise Induced Hearing Loss in Industrial Workers","authors":"Ila Izzatus Salamah, Sumardiyono Sumardiyono, Bhisma Murti","doi":"10.26911/jepublichealth.2023.08.04.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Noise is defined as sound intensity that is unwanted and can pose risks to health and safety at work, such as the risk of hypertension and noise-induced hearing loss. This study aims to analyze the effect of occupational noise on the risk of hypertension and noise induced hearing loss in industrial workers.Subjects and Method: A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out using the PRISMA guidelines and the PICO model. Population: industrial workers. Intervention: occupational noise exposure ≥85 dB. Comparison: occupational noise exposure <85 dB. Outcome: hypertension and noise induced hearing loss. Articles are collected from PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Schoolar. The keywords used “occupational noise and hypertension” OR “occupational noise and hearing loss” AND “occupational noise” OR “hypertension” AND “hearing loss” AND “cross sectional study”. A total of 13 articles met the inclusion criteria, namely primary full text paper, cross-sectional study design, with a relationship size adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR), labor research subjects, interventions in the form of exposure to noise ≥85 dB and outcomes in the form of hypertension and noise induced hearing loss for meta-analyses were then assessed using RevMan 5.3.Results: Meta-analysis included 13 cross sectional studies from China, Brazil, Ethiopia, Jordan, South Africa, Thailand, Kuwait, and Pakistan. Occupational noise ≥85 dB significantly increased the risk of hypertension (aOR= 2.07; 95% CI= 1.31 to 3.26; p= 0.002) and hearing loss (aOR= 1.97; 95% CI= 1.36 to 2.85; p= 0.003) than occupational noise <85 dB.Conclusion: Occupational noise ≥85 dB increases the risk of hypertension and hearing loss in industrial workers. Keywords: occupational noise, hypertension, hearing loss, workers Correspondence:Ila Izzatus Salamah. Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret. Jl. Ir. Sutami 36A, Surakarta 57126, Central Java, Indonesia. Email: ilaizzatus31@gmail.com. Mobile: +62858868132490.","PeriodicalId":91740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of epidemiology and public health reviews","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of epidemiology and public health reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26911/jepublichealth.2023.08.04.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Noise is defined as sound intensity that is unwanted and can pose risks to health and safety at work, such as the risk of hypertension and noise-induced hearing loss. This study aims to analyze the effect of occupational noise on the risk of hypertension and noise induced hearing loss in industrial workers.Subjects and Method: A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out using the PRISMA guidelines and the PICO model. Population: industrial workers. Intervention: occupational noise exposure ≥85 dB. Comparison: occupational noise exposure <85 dB. Outcome: hypertension and noise induced hearing loss. Articles are collected from PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Schoolar. The keywords used “occupational noise and hypertension” OR “occupational noise and hearing loss” AND “occupational noise” OR “hypertension” AND “hearing loss” AND “cross sectional study”. A total of 13 articles met the inclusion criteria, namely primary full text paper, cross-sectional study design, with a relationship size adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR), labor research subjects, interventions in the form of exposure to noise ≥85 dB and outcomes in the form of hypertension and noise induced hearing loss for meta-analyses were then assessed using RevMan 5.3.Results: Meta-analysis included 13 cross sectional studies from China, Brazil, Ethiopia, Jordan, South Africa, Thailand, Kuwait, and Pakistan. Occupational noise ≥85 dB significantly increased the risk of hypertension (aOR= 2.07; 95% CI= 1.31 to 3.26; p= 0.002) and hearing loss (aOR= 1.97; 95% CI= 1.36 to 2.85; p= 0.003) than occupational noise <85 dB.Conclusion: Occupational noise ≥85 dB increases the risk of hypertension and hearing loss in industrial workers. Keywords: occupational noise, hypertension, hearing loss, workers Correspondence:Ila Izzatus Salamah. Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret. Jl. Ir. Sutami 36A, Surakarta 57126, Central Java, Indonesia. Email: ilaizzatus31@gmail.com. Mobile: +62858868132490.
Meta分析-职业性噪音对工业工人高血压及噪音致听力损失风险的影响
背景:噪音被定义为不需要的、可能对工作中的健康和安全构成风险的声音强度,例如高血压和噪音引起的听力损失的风险。本研究旨在分析职业性噪音对产业工人高血压及噪音性听力损失风险的影响。研究对象和方法:采用PRISMA指南和PICO模型进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。人口:产业工人。干预:职业性噪声暴露≥85 dB。比较:职业噪声暴露<85 dB。结果:高血压和噪音性听力损失。文章收集自PubMed, Science Direct和Google Schoolar。关键词为“职业噪声与高血压”或“职业噪声与听力损失”与“职业噪声”或“高血压”与“听力损失”与“横断面研究”。13篇文章符合纳入标准,即主要全文论文、横断面研究设计、关系大小调整优势比(aOR)、劳动研究对象、噪声暴露≥85 dB的干预措施以及高血压和噪声性听力损失的结局,采用RevMan 5.3进行meta分析。结果:荟萃分析包括来自中国、巴西、埃塞俄比亚、约旦、南非、泰国、科威特和巴基斯坦的13项横断面研究。职业噪声≥85 dB显著增加高血压发病风险(aOR= 2.07;95% CI= 1.31 ~ 3.26;p= 0.002)和听力损失(aOR= 1.97;95% CI= 1.36 ~ 2.85;p= 0.003)高于职业噪声<85 dB。结论:≥85 dB的职业噪声增加了工业工人高血压和听力损失的风险。关键词:职业性噪声;高血压;听力损失;塞贝拉斯市场大学公共卫生硕士课程。杰。红外光谱。Sutami 36A, Surakarta 57126,中爪哇,印度尼西亚。电子邮件:ilaizzatus31@gmail.com。手机:+ 62858868132490。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信