Alternatives for the scientific production evaluation for the Social Sciences. A look from technoscience as a social phenomenon

Roelvis Ortiz Núñez
{"title":"Alternatives for the scientific production evaluation for the Social Sciences. A look from technoscience as a social phenomenon","authors":"Roelvis Ortiz Núñez","doi":"10.51528/rp.vol10.id2392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evaluation of science is a subject that has generated debates and tensions in the scientific and academic community. The dominant model for the evaluation of scientific activity presents a series of criticisms and limitations, with special emphasis on the field of Social Sciences. In order to propose solutions to this phenomenon, the research formulates as a general objective to develop an alternative model of scientific production evaluation for the Social Sciences field, from the perspective of technoscience as a social phenomenon. The research raises methodological triangulation, by integrating qualitative and quantitative analysis approaches, which include methods and techniques such as bibliographic review, application of traditional metrics and alternative science measurement, as well as the application of interviews, surveys and the Delphi method. An analysis of the state of the matter was carried out, which made it possible to identify the questions, criticisms and limitations of the science evaluation processes, which contributed to establishing a balance in relation to the contributions, discussions, inputs, referential frameworks, conceptions, approaches and perspectives. The proposal is based on the techno-scientific changes introduced in the knowledge production that allow a complementation between the knowledge production and society. From this perspective, the quality and relevance of the scientific research results, epistemological diversity and the active participation of the academic and social community are promoted.","PeriodicalId":496677,"journal":{"name":"Revista Publicando","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Publicando","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51528/rp.vol10.id2392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The evaluation of science is a subject that has generated debates and tensions in the scientific and academic community. The dominant model for the evaluation of scientific activity presents a series of criticisms and limitations, with special emphasis on the field of Social Sciences. In order to propose solutions to this phenomenon, the research formulates as a general objective to develop an alternative model of scientific production evaluation for the Social Sciences field, from the perspective of technoscience as a social phenomenon. The research raises methodological triangulation, by integrating qualitative and quantitative analysis approaches, which include methods and techniques such as bibliographic review, application of traditional metrics and alternative science measurement, as well as the application of interviews, surveys and the Delphi method. An analysis of the state of the matter was carried out, which made it possible to identify the questions, criticisms and limitations of the science evaluation processes, which contributed to establishing a balance in relation to the contributions, discussions, inputs, referential frameworks, conceptions, approaches and perspectives. The proposal is based on the techno-scientific changes introduced in the knowledge production that allow a complementation between the knowledge production and society. From this perspective, the quality and relevance of the scientific research results, epistemological diversity and the active participation of the academic and social community are promoted.
社会科学成果评价的替代方案。从技术科学作为一种社会现象的角度来看
科学评价是一个在科学界和学术界引起争论和紧张的话题。评估科学活动的主要模式提出了一系列的批评和限制,特别强调社会科学领域。为了对这一现象提出解决方案,本研究的总体目标是从技术科学作为一种社会现象的角度出发,为社会科学领域开发一种科学产出评价的替代模型。该研究通过整合定性和定量分析方法,提出了方法学上的三角测量,其中包括书目审查、传统度量和替代科学测量的应用等方法和技术,以及访谈、调查和德尔菲法的应用。对问题的现状进行了分析,从而能够确定科学评价过程中的问题、批评和局限性,从而有助于在贡献、讨论、投入、参考框架、概念、方法和观点之间建立平衡。这一建议是基于知识生产中引入的技术科学变革,使知识生产与社会之间形成互补。从这个角度来看,促进了科研成果的质量和相关性、认识论的多样性以及学术界和社会团体的积极参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信