Implementing Mission-oriented Experiments: Recommendations on Epistemic Inclusion for City Stakeholders Working in Climate Change Initiatives

Chris Foulds, Govert Valkenburg, Marianne Ryghaug, Ivana Suboticki, Tomas Moe Skjølsvold, Marius Korsnes, Sara Heidenreich
{"title":"Implementing Mission-oriented Experiments: Recommendations on Epistemic Inclusion for City Stakeholders Working in Climate Change Initiatives","authors":"Chris Foulds, Govert Valkenburg, Marianne Ryghaug, Ivana Suboticki, Tomas Moe Skjølsvold, Marius Korsnes, Sara Heidenreich","doi":"10.3138/jccpe-2023-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Policy institutions have been increasingly investing in demonstrators, pilots, living labs, testbeds, and so forth, that focus on novel experimental approaches to dealing with climate change. In particular, cities have been advocated as ideal innovation sites for such experiments. However, we argue that insufficient attention has been given to accommodating the different forms of knowledge included and produced through the design, implementation, and evaluation of these city experiments (i.e., epistemic inclusion). This article presents 10 recommendations for city policy officers and other stakeholders involved in delivering mission-oriented programmes of work to achieve epistemic inclusion in their attempts to drive innovation in cities. In illustrating our arguments, we engage with the EU Horizon Europe Mission of Climate-Neutral and Smart Cities as one example of such a programme. 100 European Cities have been selected as front-runners in this Mission. The Mission will support these 100 cities in becoming “experimentation and innovation hubs” ( European Commission, 2021b , p. 13) on route to all 100 cities becoming climate-neutral by 2030. These cities are only now starting their journeys and would greatly benefit from strategically considering epistemic inclusion issues. Establishing dialogues that are more open to controversies and paradoxes, failures, and a diversity of knowledge frameworks increases the chances for these cities to successfully address the complex and ramified challenges they face.","PeriodicalId":497723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of City Climate Policy and Economy","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of City Climate Policy and Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jccpe-2023-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Policy institutions have been increasingly investing in demonstrators, pilots, living labs, testbeds, and so forth, that focus on novel experimental approaches to dealing with climate change. In particular, cities have been advocated as ideal innovation sites for such experiments. However, we argue that insufficient attention has been given to accommodating the different forms of knowledge included and produced through the design, implementation, and evaluation of these city experiments (i.e., epistemic inclusion). This article presents 10 recommendations for city policy officers and other stakeholders involved in delivering mission-oriented programmes of work to achieve epistemic inclusion in their attempts to drive innovation in cities. In illustrating our arguments, we engage with the EU Horizon Europe Mission of Climate-Neutral and Smart Cities as one example of such a programme. 100 European Cities have been selected as front-runners in this Mission. The Mission will support these 100 cities in becoming “experimentation and innovation hubs” ( European Commission, 2021b , p. 13) on route to all 100 cities becoming climate-neutral by 2030. These cities are only now starting their journeys and would greatly benefit from strategically considering epistemic inclusion issues. Establishing dialogues that are more open to controversies and paradoxes, failures, and a diversity of knowledge frameworks increases the chances for these cities to successfully address the complex and ramified challenges they face.
实施以任务为导向的实验:气候变化倡议中城市利益相关者的认知包容建议
政策机构越来越多地投资于示范、试点、生活实验室、试验台等领域,专注于应对气候变化的新实验方法。特别是,城市一直被提倡为进行此类实验的理想创新场所。然而,我们认为,对于通过设计、实施和评估这些城市实验所包含和产生的不同形式的知识(即认知包容),人们没有给予足够的重视。本文为城市政策官员和其他利益相关者提出了10条建议,这些官员和利益相关者参与实施以任务为导向的工作计划,以在推动城市创新的努力中实现知识包容。为了说明我们的论点,我们与欧盟地平线欧洲气候中和和智慧城市任务合作,作为此类计划的一个例子。100个欧洲城市被选为本次任务的领跑者。该代表团将支持这100个城市成为“实验和创新中心”(欧盟委员会,2021b,第13页),到2030年,所有100个城市都将实现气候中和。这些城市现在才刚刚开始他们的旅程,如果战略性地考虑认知包容性问题,将大大受益。建立对争议和悖论、失败和知识框架多样性更加开放的对话,增加了这些城市成功应对其面临的复杂和分支挑战的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信