Effect of resistance training on cognition in older women with differing levels of resistance training experience: Active Aging Longitudinal Study

IF 0.3 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Paolo M. CUNHA, Daniel G. da SILVA MACHADO, João P. NUNES, Bruno R. CAVALCANTE, Liye ZOU, Leticia T. CYRINO, Gabriel KUNEVALIKI, Alex S. RIBEIRO, Ricardo J. RODRIGUES, Luís B. SARDINHA, Edilson S. CYRINO
{"title":"Effect of resistance training on cognition in older women with differing levels of resistance training experience: Active Aging Longitudinal Study","authors":"Paolo M. CUNHA, Daniel G. da SILVA MACHADO, João P. NUNES, Bruno R. CAVALCANTE, Liye ZOU, Leticia T. CYRINO, Gabriel KUNEVALIKI, Alex S. RIBEIRO, Ricardo J. RODRIGUES, Luís B. SARDINHA, Edilson S. CYRINO","doi":"10.23736/s2724-6612.21.02308-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: We aimed to analyze the impact of previous resistance training (RT) experience on cognitive function in older women.METHODS: Sixty-one physically independent women (>60 years) were assigned to one of the three groups: novice (N.=21, untrained individuals with no RT experience or who had not trained for several months), intermediate (N.=22, active individuals with 24 weeks of standardized RT experience), and a non-exercise control group (N.=18, untrained individuals). Novice and intermediate groups underwent a 12-week RT program for the whole-body (eight exercises, three sets, 8-12 repetitions, three alternate days per week). Measurements of cognitive performance (Stroop Test, Trail making Test A and B, letter and category verbal fluency test, Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test) were performed before and after the experimental period. ANCOVA was used for the comparison between groups over time.RESULTS: Improvement in the scores of almost all tests was observed in both novice and intermediate groups after RT (P<0.05), while the control group presented worse MoCA and Stroop Test scores after intervention (P<0.05). Thus, both exercise groups showed significantly different scores from the control group (P<0.05). Interestingly, a larger effect size was found for the intermediate group (ES=0.25-0.66) than for the novice group (ES = 0.16-0.35).CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that cumulative effect seems to exist, with more experienced individuals presenting more significant improvements.","PeriodicalId":29829,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Psychiatry","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/s2724-6612.21.02308-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We aimed to analyze the impact of previous resistance training (RT) experience on cognitive function in older women.METHODS: Sixty-one physically independent women (>60 years) were assigned to one of the three groups: novice (N.=21, untrained individuals with no RT experience or who had not trained for several months), intermediate (N.=22, active individuals with 24 weeks of standardized RT experience), and a non-exercise control group (N.=18, untrained individuals). Novice and intermediate groups underwent a 12-week RT program for the whole-body (eight exercises, three sets, 8-12 repetitions, three alternate days per week). Measurements of cognitive performance (Stroop Test, Trail making Test A and B, letter and category verbal fluency test, Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test) were performed before and after the experimental period. ANCOVA was used for the comparison between groups over time.RESULTS: Improvement in the scores of almost all tests was observed in both novice and intermediate groups after RT (P<0.05), while the control group presented worse MoCA and Stroop Test scores after intervention (P<0.05). Thus, both exercise groups showed significantly different scores from the control group (P<0.05). Interestingly, a larger effect size was found for the intermediate group (ES=0.25-0.66) than for the novice group (ES = 0.16-0.35).CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that cumulative effect seems to exist, with more experienced individuals presenting more significant improvements.
抗阻训练对不同抗阻训练经验的老年妇女认知能力的影响:积极衰老纵向研究
背景:我们旨在分析以往阻力训练(RT)经验对老年妇女认知功能的影响。方法:61名身体独立的女性(60岁至60岁)被分配到三组中的一组:新手组(n =21,未经训练的个体,没有RT经验或没有训练几个月),中级组(n =22,有24周标准化RT经验的活跃个体)和非运动对照组(n =18,未经训练的个体)。新手组和中级组进行了为期12周的全身RT计划(8次练习,3组,8-12次重复,每周3天交替进行)。在实验前后分别进行认知能力测试(Stroop Test, Trail making Test A和B, letter and category verbal流畅性测试,Montreal cognitive Assessment Test)。ANCOVA用于各组间的时间比较。结果:新手组和中级组在干预后几乎所有测试得分均有改善(P<0.05),对照组干预后MoCA和Stroop测试得分较对照组差(P<0.05)。因此,两个运动组的得分与对照组相比有显著差异(P<0.05)。有趣的是,中级组的效应量(ES=0.25-0.66)大于新手组(ES= 0.16-0.35)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,累积效应似乎存在,经验越丰富的个体表现出更显著的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva Psychiatry
Minerva Psychiatry PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信