Paolo M. CUNHA, Daniel G. da SILVA MACHADO, João P. NUNES, Bruno R. CAVALCANTE, Liye ZOU, Leticia T. CYRINO, Gabriel KUNEVALIKI, Alex S. RIBEIRO, Ricardo J. RODRIGUES, Luís B. SARDINHA, Edilson S. CYRINO
{"title":"Effect of resistance training on cognition in older women with differing levels of resistance training experience: Active Aging Longitudinal Study","authors":"Paolo M. CUNHA, Daniel G. da SILVA MACHADO, João P. NUNES, Bruno R. CAVALCANTE, Liye ZOU, Leticia T. CYRINO, Gabriel KUNEVALIKI, Alex S. RIBEIRO, Ricardo J. RODRIGUES, Luís B. SARDINHA, Edilson S. CYRINO","doi":"10.23736/s2724-6612.21.02308-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: We aimed to analyze the impact of previous resistance training (RT) experience on cognitive function in older women.METHODS: Sixty-one physically independent women (>60 years) were assigned to one of the three groups: novice (N.=21, untrained individuals with no RT experience or who had not trained for several months), intermediate (N.=22, active individuals with 24 weeks of standardized RT experience), and a non-exercise control group (N.=18, untrained individuals). Novice and intermediate groups underwent a 12-week RT program for the whole-body (eight exercises, three sets, 8-12 repetitions, three alternate days per week). Measurements of cognitive performance (Stroop Test, Trail making Test A and B, letter and category verbal fluency test, Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test) were performed before and after the experimental period. ANCOVA was used for the comparison between groups over time.RESULTS: Improvement in the scores of almost all tests was observed in both novice and intermediate groups after RT (P<0.05), while the control group presented worse MoCA and Stroop Test scores after intervention (P<0.05). Thus, both exercise groups showed significantly different scores from the control group (P<0.05). Interestingly, a larger effect size was found for the intermediate group (ES=0.25-0.66) than for the novice group (ES = 0.16-0.35).CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that cumulative effect seems to exist, with more experienced individuals presenting more significant improvements.","PeriodicalId":29829,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Psychiatry","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/s2724-6612.21.02308-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We aimed to analyze the impact of previous resistance training (RT) experience on cognitive function in older women.METHODS: Sixty-one physically independent women (>60 years) were assigned to one of the three groups: novice (N.=21, untrained individuals with no RT experience or who had not trained for several months), intermediate (N.=22, active individuals with 24 weeks of standardized RT experience), and a non-exercise control group (N.=18, untrained individuals). Novice and intermediate groups underwent a 12-week RT program for the whole-body (eight exercises, three sets, 8-12 repetitions, three alternate days per week). Measurements of cognitive performance (Stroop Test, Trail making Test A and B, letter and category verbal fluency test, Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test) were performed before and after the experimental period. ANCOVA was used for the comparison between groups over time.RESULTS: Improvement in the scores of almost all tests was observed in both novice and intermediate groups after RT (P<0.05), while the control group presented worse MoCA and Stroop Test scores after intervention (P<0.05). Thus, both exercise groups showed significantly different scores from the control group (P<0.05). Interestingly, a larger effect size was found for the intermediate group (ES=0.25-0.66) than for the novice group (ES = 0.16-0.35).CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that cumulative effect seems to exist, with more experienced individuals presenting more significant improvements.
背景:我们旨在分析以往阻力训练(RT)经验对老年妇女认知功能的影响。方法:61名身体独立的女性(60岁至60岁)被分配到三组中的一组:新手组(n =21,未经训练的个体,没有RT经验或没有训练几个月),中级组(n =22,有24周标准化RT经验的活跃个体)和非运动对照组(n =18,未经训练的个体)。新手组和中级组进行了为期12周的全身RT计划(8次练习,3组,8-12次重复,每周3天交替进行)。在实验前后分别进行认知能力测试(Stroop Test, Trail making Test A和B, letter and category verbal流畅性测试,Montreal cognitive Assessment Test)。ANCOVA用于各组间的时间比较。结果:新手组和中级组在干预后几乎所有测试得分均有改善(P<0.05),对照组干预后MoCA和Stroop测试得分较对照组差(P<0.05)。因此,两个运动组的得分与对照组相比有显著差异(P<0.05)。有趣的是,中级组的效应量(ES=0.25-0.66)大于新手组(ES= 0.16-0.35)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,累积效应似乎存在,经验越丰富的个体表现出更显著的改善。