Stuart Amos-Gibbs, Adrian Martins, Abi Degg, Paula Baraitser, Elena Ardines
{"title":"O24 Quantitative reactive values to support HIV result notifications on small blood volumes from self-sampling test kits","authors":"Stuart Amos-Gibbs, Adrian Martins, Abi Degg, Paula Baraitser, Elena Ardines","doi":"10.1136/sextrans-bashh-2023.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Introduction</h3> HIV tests on small blood samples complete the first stage only of the usual 3 stage HIV testing confirmatory algorithm. For this reason, false positive rates are high. Quantitative reactive values could support counselling when giving these results. We looked at reactive values for confirmed/unconfirmed positives to guide use of reactivity rates in results notification. <h3>Methods</h3> We analysed routinely collected data from all HIV self-sampling tests completed within SH:24 during 2022 including reactivity value and the outcome of confirmatory testing. Standard practice for notifying users is 6 contact attempts using 3 different means of communication. The results of confirmatory testing are obtained from the user or the service attended. <h3>Results</h3> 257,143 HIV tests were done in 2022 of which 966 (0.4%) were reactive. The results of confirmatory testing were available in 818 (84.68%) and 141 reactives were confirmed positive of which 85 were new diagnoses. Reactivity values ranged from 1.0 - 2713. The positive predictive value (PPV) for all reactives 0.17 and the PPV for reactives over 30 was 0.9. <h3>Discussion</h3> Self-testing is an important source of new HIV diagnoses. While some confirmed positives had reactivity value less than 30, a reactive value over 30 is an important factor in counselling those with self-sampling test results.","PeriodicalId":19619,"journal":{"name":"Oral Presentations - Late-Breaking Proffered Abstracts","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Presentations - Late-Breaking Proffered Abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-bashh-2023.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
HIV tests on small blood samples complete the first stage only of the usual 3 stage HIV testing confirmatory algorithm. For this reason, false positive rates are high. Quantitative reactive values could support counselling when giving these results. We looked at reactive values for confirmed/unconfirmed positives to guide use of reactivity rates in results notification.
Methods
We analysed routinely collected data from all HIV self-sampling tests completed within SH:24 during 2022 including reactivity value and the outcome of confirmatory testing. Standard practice for notifying users is 6 contact attempts using 3 different means of communication. The results of confirmatory testing are obtained from the user or the service attended.
Results
257,143 HIV tests were done in 2022 of which 966 (0.4%) were reactive. The results of confirmatory testing were available in 818 (84.68%) and 141 reactives were confirmed positive of which 85 were new diagnoses. Reactivity values ranged from 1.0 - 2713. The positive predictive value (PPV) for all reactives 0.17 and the PPV for reactives over 30 was 0.9.
Discussion
Self-testing is an important source of new HIV diagnoses. While some confirmed positives had reactivity value less than 30, a reactive value over 30 is an important factor in counselling those with self-sampling test results.