A community-based study to set the policy agenda for the well-being of 2GSBTQ+ men in Ontario, Canada

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Tin D Vo, Cameron McKenzie
{"title":"A community-based study to set the policy agenda for the well-being of 2GSBTQ+ men in Ontario, Canada","authors":"Tin D Vo, Cameron McKenzie","doi":"10.1093/cdj/bsad016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Two-Spirit, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (2SGBTQ+) men face significant health inequity. This article reports on two phases of a study conducted in conjunction with the Gay Men’s Sexual Health Alliance (GMSH) to examine 2SGBTQ+ men’s health inequity. First, an environmental scan of existing Ontario government health policy was conducted to identify specific gaps. Second, six focus groups of GMSH Alliance members (n = 21) were conducted to understand the impact of policy gaps and identify potential strategies to address them from the community’s perspective. We argue that to meet the wellness needs of the community, community development and healthy public policies are appropriate strategies. The environmental scan confirmed that there is currently very limited policy content specific to 2SGBTQ+ men’s wellness and mental health. Data from focus groups were consistent with the scan. GMSH Alliance members struggled to serve their community in the absence of sufficient resources. Participants also expressed an interest in advocacy, but they felt that they lacked the skills to do so. It is clear that 2SGBTQ+ men face population-specific health risks, and much work is needed to advocate for 2SGBTQ+-centred well-being policy. Future work should develop a policy that focuses on addressing many of the issues raised in this research, while also contributing to the achievement of health equity for 2SGBTQ+ men.","PeriodicalId":47329,"journal":{"name":"Community Development Journal","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsad016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Two-Spirit, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (2SGBTQ+) men face significant health inequity. This article reports on two phases of a study conducted in conjunction with the Gay Men’s Sexual Health Alliance (GMSH) to examine 2SGBTQ+ men’s health inequity. First, an environmental scan of existing Ontario government health policy was conducted to identify specific gaps. Second, six focus groups of GMSH Alliance members (n = 21) were conducted to understand the impact of policy gaps and identify potential strategies to address them from the community’s perspective. We argue that to meet the wellness needs of the community, community development and healthy public policies are appropriate strategies. The environmental scan confirmed that there is currently very limited policy content specific to 2SGBTQ+ men’s wellness and mental health. Data from focus groups were consistent with the scan. GMSH Alliance members struggled to serve their community in the absence of sufficient resources. Participants also expressed an interest in advocacy, but they felt that they lacked the skills to do so. It is clear that 2SGBTQ+ men face population-specific health risks, and much work is needed to advocate for 2SGBTQ+-centred well-being policy. Future work should develop a policy that focuses on addressing many of the issues raised in this research, while also contributing to the achievement of health equity for 2SGBTQ+ men.
一项以社区为基础的研究,旨在为加拿大安大略省2GSBTQ+男性的福祉制定政策议程
双性恋、同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿(2SGBTQ+)男性面临着严重的健康不平等。本文报道了与男同性恋性健康联盟(GMSH)联合进行的一项研究的两个阶段,该研究旨在调查2SGBTQ+男性的健康不平等。首先,对安大略省政府现有的卫生政策进行了环境扫描,以确定具体差距。其次,对GMSH联盟成员进行了6个焦点小组(n = 21),以了解政策差距的影响,并从社区的角度确定解决政策差距的潜在策略。我们认为,为了满足社区的健康需求,社区发展和健康公共政策是适当的策略。环境扫描证实,目前针对2gbtq +男性健康和心理健康的政策内容非常有限。焦点小组的数据与扫描结果一致。GMSH联盟成员在缺乏足够资源的情况下努力为社区服务。与会者也表达了对倡导的兴趣,但他们觉得自己缺乏这样做的技能。很明显,2SGBTQ+男性面临特定人群的健康风险,需要做大量工作来倡导以2SGBTQ+为中心的福祉政策。未来的工作应该制定一项政策,重点解决本研究中提出的许多问题,同时也有助于实现2gbtq +男性的健康平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Community Development Journal
Community Development Journal DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Since 1966 the leading international journal in its field, covering a wide range of topics, reviewing significant developments and providing a forum for cutting-edge debates about theory and practice. It adopts a broad definition of community development to include policy, planning and action as they impact on the life of communities. We particularly seek to publish critically focused articles which challenge received wisdom, report and discuss innovative practices, and relate issues of community development to questions of social justice, diversity and environmental sustainability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信