Assessing streetscape development effects on walking and cycling in historic contexts: the case study of Afrang district, Port Said, Egypt

IF 1.5 4区 经济学 0 ARCHITECTURE
Tamer ElSerafi
{"title":"Assessing streetscape development effects on walking and cycling in historic contexts: the case study of Afrang district, Port Said, Egypt","authors":"Tamer ElSerafi","doi":"10.1108/ohi-02-2023-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Urban mobility has substantially evolved in several western countries, shifting from interest in road expansion strategies to cater motorized movement to the emphasis on sustainable mobility. This is, however, not the case in several developing countries that still try to accommodate vehicular flows in inner historic cities. This paper aims at providing an assessment framework that helps in evaluating the effect of streetscape development on the walking and cycling environment in historic contexts. Design/methodology/approach This research follows a two-phase methodology. Phase 1 is the investigation of the literature review including the streetscape design, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and indicators for the assessment of walking and cycling environment. This phase results in developing a set of indicators for the assessment. Phase 2 is the case study including, methods, steps and results of the assessment based on the output of Phase 1. This phase concludes with a discussion on the challenges and recommendations for the enhancement. Findings The streetscape development in Afrang was insufficient and negatively affected the walking and cycling environment. It was motorized-oriented, instead of enhancing green mobility. The interventions led to more crowds, safety risks and less pleasant experience. Moreover, the car users' experience was enhanced initially; however, the traffic situation did not persist. A sustainable urban mobility approach is necessary to be implemented with consideration to the global level and the relation to SDGs. Originality/value There is a gap in tackling the research problem both within the context of Port Said in particular and Egyptian context in general. Local authorities need a clear structured methodology to follow in the development of the streetscape. The assessment indicators gathered can be the basis for evaluating future plans.","PeriodicalId":44969,"journal":{"name":"Open House International","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open House International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ohi-02-2023-0024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Urban mobility has substantially evolved in several western countries, shifting from interest in road expansion strategies to cater motorized movement to the emphasis on sustainable mobility. This is, however, not the case in several developing countries that still try to accommodate vehicular flows in inner historic cities. This paper aims at providing an assessment framework that helps in evaluating the effect of streetscape development on the walking and cycling environment in historic contexts. Design/methodology/approach This research follows a two-phase methodology. Phase 1 is the investigation of the literature review including the streetscape design, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and indicators for the assessment of walking and cycling environment. This phase results in developing a set of indicators for the assessment. Phase 2 is the case study including, methods, steps and results of the assessment based on the output of Phase 1. This phase concludes with a discussion on the challenges and recommendations for the enhancement. Findings The streetscape development in Afrang was insufficient and negatively affected the walking and cycling environment. It was motorized-oriented, instead of enhancing green mobility. The interventions led to more crowds, safety risks and less pleasant experience. Moreover, the car users' experience was enhanced initially; however, the traffic situation did not persist. A sustainable urban mobility approach is necessary to be implemented with consideration to the global level and the relation to SDGs. Originality/value There is a gap in tackling the research problem both within the context of Port Said in particular and Egyptian context in general. Local authorities need a clear structured methodology to follow in the development of the streetscape. The assessment indicators gathered can be the basis for evaluating future plans.
评估历史背景下街道景观发展对步行和骑行的影响:埃及塞得港阿夫朗地区的案例研究
在一些西方国家,城市机动性已经有了很大的发展,从对道路扩张战略的兴趣转向对可持续机动性的重视。然而,在一些发展中国家,情况并非如此,这些国家仍然试图在历史悠久的城市内部容纳车辆流量。本文旨在提供一个评估框架,以帮助评估历史背景下街道景观发展对步行和骑行环境的影响。设计/方法/方法本研究采用两阶段方法。第一阶段是文献综述的调查,包括街景设计、可持续发展目标(SDGs)和步行和骑行环境评估指标。这一阶段的结果是为评估制定一套指标。第二阶段是案例研究,包括基于第一阶段产出的评估方法、步骤和结果。这一阶段最后讨论了增强的挑战和建议。结果阿法兰的街道景观开发不足,对步行和骑行环境产生了负面影响。它以机动为导向,而不是提高绿色机动性。这些干预措施导致了更多的人群、安全风险和更不愉快的体验。此外,汽车用户的体验得到了初步提升;然而,交通状况并没有持续下去。考虑到全球层面以及与可持续发展目标的关系,有必要实施可持续的城市交通方法。独创性/价值在处理研究问题方面存在差距,特别是在塞得港的背景下,以及在埃及的一般背景下。地方当局需要在街景开发中遵循一个明确的结构化方法。收集到的评价指标可以作为评价未来计划的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The journal of an association of institues and individuals concerned with housing, design and development in the built environment. Theories, tools and pratice with special emphasis on the local scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信