Hood Technique for Single Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Narmina Khanmammadova, Tuan Thanh Nguyen, Andrei D. Cumpanas, Kirsten Young, Catherine Fung, Mohammed Shahait, David I. Lee
{"title":"Hood Technique for Single Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy","authors":"Narmina Khanmammadova, Tuan Thanh Nguyen, Andrei D. Cumpanas, Kirsten Young, Catherine Fung, Mohammed Shahait, David I. Lee","doi":"10.1089/vid.2023.0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The gold standard for surgical management of localized prostate cancer is robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in the United States.1 Different techniques and modifications were implemented in the last two decades to enhance the functional outcomes while not compromising the oncological outcomes.2,3 Recently, the Hood technique which emphasizes the preservation of periurethral anatomical structures in Space of Retzius including endopelvic fascia, puboprostatic ligaments, anterior vessels, detrusor apron as well as some detrusor muscle was described using the multiport robotic platform. Since the approval of the da Vinci Single-Port (SP) platform (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA), multiple benefits were reported such as shorter length of stay with higher rates of discharge on the day of surgery, decrease in operation time, postoperative opioid use, and patient-reported pain scores.4 However, the learning curve of the RARP with SP platform remains substantial.5 Herein, we describe our modified hood technique for SP-RARP, which aims to develop a reproducible procedure with a short learning curve, without compromising oncological outcomes, as well as offering durable improved functional outcomes. Methods: All data were prospectively collected into an IRB-approved registry database. A total of 10 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer underwent transperitoneal SP-RARP by a single high-volume surgeon (D.I.L.). There were no exclusion criteria defined preoperatively. The postoperative status of sexual function was defined by the percentage of erection fullness as the patient-reported ability to have a full and hard erection, and several patient and tumor characteristics as well as perioperative and postoperative outcomes were abstracted. Continence recovery was defined as the patient reported no pads or only one security pad used. Results: The median age was 62.5 (53.5–72.75) and median BMI was 26.25 (24.68–27.58) kg/m2. The median operative time of 10 SP RARP cases was 144.5 (134.3–177.5) minutes and the median console time (n = 7) was 93 (93–110) minutes. The mean estimated blood loss was 50 (50–100) mL. There were no patients with positive surgical margins. No blood transfusions and conversions to open surgery were needed and no perioperative complications occurred. One patient who developed a urinary tract infection was managed with oral antibiotics and one patient needed replacement of the Foley catheter as he went into urinary retention after the first catheter removal on 7-day postop. All patients were discharged home on the same day. There was no readmission during the postoperative 30-days. Early continence rates at 3-months of nine patients reporting their continence status were favorable as 88.9% of patients (n = 8/9) reported using no pads or only one security pad. The median American Urological Association Symptom score of the six patients at 3-months was 5 (4–8.25). The median percentage of the fullness of erection of seven patients at 3-months was 60% (50%–70%). Conclusions: This report demonstrates the Hood technique for SP RARP that is reproducible with a short learning curve, and favorable perioperative, and intermediate functional outcomes which could be safely introduced into a program experienced in multiport RARP. No competing financial interests exist. Patient Consent Statement: Author(s) have received and archived patient consent for video recording/publication in advance of video recording of procedure. Runtime of video: 6 mins 52 secs","PeriodicalId":92974,"journal":{"name":"Videourology (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Videourology (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/vid.2023.0045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The gold standard for surgical management of localized prostate cancer is robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in the United States.1 Different techniques and modifications were implemented in the last two decades to enhance the functional outcomes while not compromising the oncological outcomes.2,3 Recently, the Hood technique which emphasizes the preservation of periurethral anatomical structures in Space of Retzius including endopelvic fascia, puboprostatic ligaments, anterior vessels, detrusor apron as well as some detrusor muscle was described using the multiport robotic platform. Since the approval of the da Vinci Single-Port (SP) platform (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA), multiple benefits were reported such as shorter length of stay with higher rates of discharge on the day of surgery, decrease in operation time, postoperative opioid use, and patient-reported pain scores.4 However, the learning curve of the RARP with SP platform remains substantial.5 Herein, we describe our modified hood technique for SP-RARP, which aims to develop a reproducible procedure with a short learning curve, without compromising oncological outcomes, as well as offering durable improved functional outcomes. Methods: All data were prospectively collected into an IRB-approved registry database. A total of 10 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer underwent transperitoneal SP-RARP by a single high-volume surgeon (D.I.L.). There were no exclusion criteria defined preoperatively. The postoperative status of sexual function was defined by the percentage of erection fullness as the patient-reported ability to have a full and hard erection, and several patient and tumor characteristics as well as perioperative and postoperative outcomes were abstracted. Continence recovery was defined as the patient reported no pads or only one security pad used. Results: The median age was 62.5 (53.5–72.75) and median BMI was 26.25 (24.68–27.58) kg/m2. The median operative time of 10 SP RARP cases was 144.5 (134.3–177.5) minutes and the median console time (n = 7) was 93 (93–110) minutes. The mean estimated blood loss was 50 (50–100) mL. There were no patients with positive surgical margins. No blood transfusions and conversions to open surgery were needed and no perioperative complications occurred. One patient who developed a urinary tract infection was managed with oral antibiotics and one patient needed replacement of the Foley catheter as he went into urinary retention after the first catheter removal on 7-day postop. All patients were discharged home on the same day. There was no readmission during the postoperative 30-days. Early continence rates at 3-months of nine patients reporting their continence status were favorable as 88.9% of patients (n = 8/9) reported using no pads or only one security pad. The median American Urological Association Symptom score of the six patients at 3-months was 5 (4–8.25). The median percentage of the fullness of erection of seven patients at 3-months was 60% (50%–70%). Conclusions: This report demonstrates the Hood technique for SP RARP that is reproducible with a short learning curve, and favorable perioperative, and intermediate functional outcomes which could be safely introduced into a program experienced in multiport RARP. No competing financial interests exist. Patient Consent Statement: Author(s) have received and archived patient consent for video recording/publication in advance of video recording of procedure. Runtime of video: 6 mins 52 secs
单端口机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的Hood技术
在美国,局部前列腺癌手术治疗的金标准是机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)。在过去的二十年中,不同的技术和修改被实施,以提高功能结果,同时不影响肿瘤结果。2,3近年来,利用多通道机器人平台,介绍了Hood技术,该技术强调保留尿道周围的Retzius空间解剖结构,包括盆腔内筋膜、耻骨前列腺韧带、前血管、逼尿肌围以及部分逼尿肌。自达芬奇单端口(SP)平台(Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA)获得批准以来,多项益处被报道,如手术当日住院时间缩短,出院率提高,手术时间减少,术后阿片类药物使用减少,患者报告疼痛评分减少然而,SP平台的RARP的学习曲线仍然很大在此,我们描述了我们改进的SP-RARP技术,旨在开发一种具有短学习曲线的可重复过程,不影响肿瘤结果,并提供持久的改善功能结果。方法:所有数据前瞻性地收集到irb批准的注册数据库中。共有10例连续的局限性前列腺癌患者接受了由一名高容量外科医生(D.I.L.)经腹膜SP-RARP。术前没有确定排除标准。术后性功能状态由勃起完满率定义,即患者报告的勃起完满和硬勃起的能力,并提取了一些患者和肿瘤特征以及围手术期和术后结果。失禁恢复定义为患者报告无垫或仅使用一个安全垫。结果:中位年龄为62.5(53.5-72.75),中位BMI为26.25 (24.68-27.58)kg/m2。10例SP RARP患者的中位手术时间为144.5 (134.3 ~ 177.5)min,中位缓解时间(n = 7)为93 (93 ~ 110)min。平均估计失血量为50 (50 - 100)mL。没有手术切缘阳性的患者。无输血及转开腹手术,无围手术期并发症发生。一名发生尿路感染的患者使用口服抗生素治疗,一名患者在第一次拔管后7天出现尿潴留,需要更换Foley导尿管。所有患者均于当日出院。术后30天无再入院病例。在9例报告失禁状态的患者中,88.9%的患者(n = 8/9)报告未使用护垫或仅使用一个安全护垫,3个月时的早期失禁率良好。6例患者3个月时美国泌尿学会症状评分中位数为5分(4-8.25分)。7例患者在3个月时勃起完全的中位数百分比为60%(50%-70%)。结论:本报告证明了Hood技术用于SP RARP具有可重复性,学习曲线短,良好的围手术期和中等功能结果,可以安全地引入多端口RARP程序。不存在相互竞争的经济利益。患者同意声明:在视频录制过程之前,作者已收到并存档患者同意进行视频录制/发布。影片时长:6分52秒
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信