Turco-Greek Battles in 1921 in The British Press

Mekki ULUDAĞ
{"title":"Turco-Greek Battles in 1921 in The British Press","authors":"Mekki ULUDAĞ","doi":"10.21547/jss.1311953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the Turkish-Greek War on the Western Front during the National Struggle period of 1921 by analyzing British press coverage. The study aims to unveil how the Turkish-Greek fronts were portrayed in the British press. The research employs a comparative analysis method, assessing news and articles in the British press by comparing them with local sources. The study primarily focuses on news from Reuters, Associated Press, Havas agencies, as well as articles authored by newspaper reporters and war correspondents. The British press extensively covered the Greek occupation in Western Anatolia, which received strong support from the Allied forces, particularly the British. Initially, the Greek invasions were lauded, but starting in September 1921, the British press began reporting more negative developments regarding the Greek invasions and expressed admiration for Turkish progress. It is important to note that the British press did not maintain a consistent attitude throughout the Turco-Greek War. Furthermore, the stance of the British press significantly differed from the policy of the British government, indicating that the British press aligned its coverage with the evolving dynamics of the war. The British press predominantly featured news and statements from the victorious advancing side, while rarely including perspectives from the defeated and retreating side in the Turkish-Greek War.","PeriodicalId":55743,"journal":{"name":"Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences","volume":"30 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.1311953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the Turkish-Greek War on the Western Front during the National Struggle period of 1921 by analyzing British press coverage. The study aims to unveil how the Turkish-Greek fronts were portrayed in the British press. The research employs a comparative analysis method, assessing news and articles in the British press by comparing them with local sources. The study primarily focuses on news from Reuters, Associated Press, Havas agencies, as well as articles authored by newspaper reporters and war correspondents. The British press extensively covered the Greek occupation in Western Anatolia, which received strong support from the Allied forces, particularly the British. Initially, the Greek invasions were lauded, but starting in September 1921, the British press began reporting more negative developments regarding the Greek invasions and expressed admiration for Turkish progress. It is important to note that the British press did not maintain a consistent attitude throughout the Turco-Greek War. Furthermore, the stance of the British press significantly differed from the policy of the British government, indicating that the British press aligned its coverage with the evolving dynamics of the war. The British press predominantly featured news and statements from the victorious advancing side, while rarely including perspectives from the defeated and retreating side in the Turkish-Greek War.
1921年的土耳其-希腊战争,英国出版社
本文通过分析1921年民族斗争时期的英国媒体报道,考察了西线的土希战争。这项研究旨在揭示英国媒体是如何描绘土耳其-希腊战线的。该研究采用了比较分析的方法,通过将英国媒体的新闻和文章与当地来源进行比较来评估新闻和文章。这项研究主要关注路透社、美联社、哈瓦斯通讯社的新闻,以及报社记者和战地记者撰写的文章。英国媒体广泛报道了希腊在西安纳托利亚的占领,得到了盟军,特别是英国的大力支持。最初,希腊的入侵受到赞扬,但从1921年9月开始,英国媒体开始报道更多关于希腊入侵的负面发展,并对土耳其的进步表示钦佩。值得注意的是,在整个土耳其-希腊战争期间,英国新闻界并没有保持一贯的态度。此外,英国媒体的立场与英国政府的政策明显不同,这表明英国媒体的报道与战争的演变动态保持一致。英国媒体主要报道胜利推进方的新闻和声明,而很少包括土耳其-希腊战争中战败和撤退方的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
152
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信