INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE IN REFORMING THE INCOME TAXATION SYSTEM IN POST-PANDEMIC AND WAR PERIODS

Nataliya FROLOVA
{"title":"INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE IN REFORMING THE INCOME TAXATION SYSTEM IN POST-PANDEMIC AND WAR PERIODS","authors":"Nataliya FROLOVA","doi":"10.15407/economyukr.2023.10.044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The international experience in reforming income taxation systems in war and post-war conditions is summarized, in particular, approaches to reforming income taxation systems in the USA, Sweden, Denmark, France and Great Britain are compared. Considered examples demonstrate that despite the low budget efficiency of wealth taxes in many countries of Europe and the world (they did not bring considerable budget revenues and at the same time required significant administrative costs), excess profits taxation has been widely practiced for a long time even after the end of the war, in particular, in the post-pandemic period and during the current energy crisis in the EU countries. Main views are systematized regarding individual wealth taxation – not so much as a threat of capital outflow and disincentive for capital investments but as an important component of the tax system, which, coupled with other income and property taxes, contributes to the restoration of wealth distribution equality and minimizes opportunities for tax evasion. Attention is focused on the application of excess profits tax by the EU countries as a temporary European solidarity contribution in response to the global socio-economic crisis caused by the negative consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic and the increase in energy prices due to the military aggression of the Russian Federation. The key requirements that individual wealth tax must meet to be introduced in Ukraine are substantiated. They include establishing a tax exemption threshold at a high level, as well as extending it not only to the residents of Ukraine, but also to the citizens of other countries who own assets on its territory, in order to increase the tax’s progressivity and budgetary efficiency.","PeriodicalId":495958,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomìka Ukraïni","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomìka Ukraïni","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2023.10.044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The international experience in reforming income taxation systems in war and post-war conditions is summarized, in particular, approaches to reforming income taxation systems in the USA, Sweden, Denmark, France and Great Britain are compared. Considered examples demonstrate that despite the low budget efficiency of wealth taxes in many countries of Europe and the world (they did not bring considerable budget revenues and at the same time required significant administrative costs), excess profits taxation has been widely practiced for a long time even after the end of the war, in particular, in the post-pandemic period and during the current energy crisis in the EU countries. Main views are systematized regarding individual wealth taxation – not so much as a threat of capital outflow and disincentive for capital investments but as an important component of the tax system, which, coupled with other income and property taxes, contributes to the restoration of wealth distribution equality and minimizes opportunities for tax evasion. Attention is focused on the application of excess profits tax by the EU countries as a temporary European solidarity contribution in response to the global socio-economic crisis caused by the negative consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic and the increase in energy prices due to the military aggression of the Russian Federation. The key requirements that individual wealth tax must meet to be introduced in Ukraine are substantiated. They include establishing a tax exemption threshold at a high level, as well as extending it not only to the residents of Ukraine, but also to the citizens of other countries who own assets on its territory, in order to increase the tax’s progressivity and budgetary efficiency.
大流行后和战争时期所得税制度改革的国际经验
总结了战时和战后所得税制度改革的国际经验,特别对美国、瑞典、丹麦、法国和英国的所得税制度改革方法进行了比较。经过深思熟虑的例子表明,尽管财富税在欧洲和世界许多国家的预算效率很低(它们没有带来可观的预算收入,同时需要大量的行政费用),但超额利润税在很长一段时间内广泛实行,甚至在战争结束后,特别是在大流行病后时期和欧盟国家目前的能源危机期间。关于个人财富税的主要观点是系统化的——与其说是资本外流的威胁和对资本投资的抑制,不如说是税收制度的一个重要组成部分,它与其他收入和财产税一起,有助于恢复财富分配的平等,并最大限度地减少逃税的机会。关注的重点是欧盟国家征收超额利润税,作为欧洲临时团结捐款,以应对2019冠状病毒病大流行的负面影响和俄罗斯联邦军事侵略导致的能源价格上涨所造成的全球社会经济危机。在乌克兰引入个人财富税必须满足的关键要求是有根据的。这些措施包括建立高水平的免税门槛,并将其不仅扩大到乌克兰居民,而且扩大到在其领土上拥有资产的其他国家公民,以增加税收的累进性和预算效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信