The Association Between Performance Information and the Satisfaction of Different Social Groups: Citizen Evaluation by Racial Groups

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Minjung Kim
{"title":"The Association Between Performance Information and the Satisfaction of Different Social Groups: Citizen Evaluation by Racial Groups","authors":"Minjung Kim","doi":"10.1080/01900692.2023.2257001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTCitizen satisfaction is an important instrument to assess the quality of public services and hold governments accountable to their citizens. Despite significant amount of research, few studies have examined whether citizen satisfaction is generalizable across social groups or whether different social groups interpret it differently. Based upon the ingroup preference theory, this study uses data from Chicago Public Schools to argue that citizen satisfaction varies across different social groups, such that different performance information influences each groups’ level of satisfaction differently. The findings suggest that different types of performance information (overall v. group performance) have different effects on citizens of different racial groups when they evaluate public services. Further, it is important to measure performance for each social group, and as each group’s performance increases, divergence in citizen satisfaction among racial groups may decrease, helping public managers reduce unexpected factors that harm citizens’ perception of their agencies.KEYWORDS: Citizen satisfactionngroup preferencesperformance gapracial integration AcknowledgementI’d like to thank the reviewers and the editor for their valuable feedback. Big appreciation also goes to Nathan Favero and Miyeon Song for giving me comments on the earlier version of the paper.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2023.2257001Notes1. The average response rate of high schools is 18.2% where most responses are highly likely to be removed by CPS by their standard of lower than 25%, while the average response rate of elementary schools is 46.6%.2. All four options were scaled as a percentage (0–100%). This study created a weighted index measure by weighting strongly disagree as 0, somewhat disagree as 1, somewhat agree as 2, and strongly agree as 3.3. In the annual report cards and the website, Illinois State Board of Education provides average test scores at the school level as well as disaggregated test scores by different social categories including race.4. In this model, outgroup performance was calculated using the following equation (with the White group serving as the ingroup in this example). The pass rate for each racial group was calculated separately and assembled into one variable (with White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian groups included). The outgroup pass rate for the White group = overall pass rate × 100/(100 – percentage White students) – (White pass rate * percentage White students)/(100 – percentage White students).One should note that the estimation is not perfect, as the percentage of each racial group in a school is the percentage of enrolled students, rather than test takers.5. Parent satisfaction was measured at the race-school level which means that the Chicago Public School system aggregated the parent satisfaction response at the race level across all the schools. The final sample of this study includes 688 racial groups of parents in 178 elementary schools.","PeriodicalId":47833,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2023.2257001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTCitizen satisfaction is an important instrument to assess the quality of public services and hold governments accountable to their citizens. Despite significant amount of research, few studies have examined whether citizen satisfaction is generalizable across social groups or whether different social groups interpret it differently. Based upon the ingroup preference theory, this study uses data from Chicago Public Schools to argue that citizen satisfaction varies across different social groups, such that different performance information influences each groups’ level of satisfaction differently. The findings suggest that different types of performance information (overall v. group performance) have different effects on citizens of different racial groups when they evaluate public services. Further, it is important to measure performance for each social group, and as each group’s performance increases, divergence in citizen satisfaction among racial groups may decrease, helping public managers reduce unexpected factors that harm citizens’ perception of their agencies.KEYWORDS: Citizen satisfactionngroup preferencesperformance gapracial integration AcknowledgementI’d like to thank the reviewers and the editor for their valuable feedback. Big appreciation also goes to Nathan Favero and Miyeon Song for giving me comments on the earlier version of the paper.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2023.2257001Notes1. The average response rate of high schools is 18.2% where most responses are highly likely to be removed by CPS by their standard of lower than 25%, while the average response rate of elementary schools is 46.6%.2. All four options were scaled as a percentage (0–100%). This study created a weighted index measure by weighting strongly disagree as 0, somewhat disagree as 1, somewhat agree as 2, and strongly agree as 3.3. In the annual report cards and the website, Illinois State Board of Education provides average test scores at the school level as well as disaggregated test scores by different social categories including race.4. In this model, outgroup performance was calculated using the following equation (with the White group serving as the ingroup in this example). The pass rate for each racial group was calculated separately and assembled into one variable (with White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian groups included). The outgroup pass rate for the White group = overall pass rate × 100/(100 – percentage White students) – (White pass rate * percentage White students)/(100 – percentage White students).One should note that the estimation is not perfect, as the percentage of each racial group in a school is the percentage of enrolled students, rather than test takers.5. Parent satisfaction was measured at the race-school level which means that the Chicago Public School system aggregated the parent satisfaction response at the race level across all the schools. The final sample of this study includes 688 racial groups of parents in 178 elementary schools.
绩效信息与不同社会群体满意度的关系:基于种族群体的公民评价
摘要公民满意度是评估公共服务质量、督促政府对公民负责的重要工具。尽管有大量的研究,但很少有研究调查公民满意度是否可以在不同的社会群体中推广,或者不同的社会群体对公民满意度的解释是否不同。基于群体内偏好理论,本研究使用芝加哥公立学校的数据,认为公民满意度在不同的社会群体中存在差异,不同的绩效信息对每个群体满意度的影响是不同的。研究结果表明,不同类型的绩效信息(整体绩效和群体绩效)对不同种族的公民在评估公共服务时有不同的影响。此外,衡量每个社会群体的绩效很重要,随着每个群体绩效的提高,不同种族群体之间公民满意度的差异可能会减少,这有助于公共管理者减少损害公民对其机构看法的意外因素。关键词:公民满意度群体偏好绩效差距种族融合致谢感谢审稿人和编辑提供的宝贵反馈。我还要感谢Nathan Favero和Miyeon Song,感谢他们对文章早期版本的评论。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。补充材料本文的补充数据可在https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2023.2257001Notes1上在线获取。高中的平均回复率为18.2%,大部分回复率以低于25%的标准被CPS删除的可能性很大,而小学的平均回复率为46.6%。所有四个选项都按百分比进行缩放(0-100%)。本研究创建了一个加权指标,其权重为强烈不同意为0,有些不同意为1,有些同意为2,强烈同意为3.3。在年度成绩单和网站上,伊利诺伊州教育委员会提供了学校的平均考试成绩,以及不同社会类别(包括种族)的分类考试成绩。在该模型中,外群绩效使用以下公式计算(本例中,White组作为内组)。每个种族群体的通过率分别计算,并组合成一个变量(包括白人、黑人、西班牙裔和亚洲群体)。白人组的外组通过率=整体通过率× 100/(100 -白人学生百分比)-(白人通过率*白人学生百分比)/(100 -白人学生百分比)。需要注意的是,这个估计并不完美,因为每个种族在学校的百分比是在校生的百分比,而不是参加考试的人数。家长满意度是在种族学校水平上测量的,这意味着芝加哥公立学校系统在所有学校的种族水平上汇总了家长满意度反应。本研究的最终样本包括178所小学的688个种族的家长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: IJPA is an international, research-driven, and peer-reviewed publication aimed at exploring the latest developments in public administration, public policy, and management – translating theory for practice and practice into theory. IJPA is a truly global journal in scope, covering developed, emerging and transitional states, nonprofit and nongovernmental organizations, and all areas of public activity. We welcome theoretical, analytical, quantitative, qualitative, empirical, and practitioner-based, as well as individual country-based, region-based, and especially comparative works. Our target audience is not just scholars, but also policy-makers and practitioners, including aspiring public sector leaders engaged in education and research in the growing global public service, policy, and administration, and governance community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信