{"title":"Analisis Fuel Ratio Pada Project Penambangan di Pit 1 PT Cahaya Riau Mandiri Jobsite PT Duta Alam Sumatera","authors":"Yunita Yunita, Edwin Harsiga","doi":"10.33019/mineral.v8i1.4097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzed the fuel ratio in mining projects to determine the factors that affected loose opportunity and the profit or losses encountered by the company. This analysis process was conduted by determining the target and realization of production where the overburden and coal getting production target in March on Fleet 1 was 68.885 bcm/month with the fuel consumption of 11.907,19 liter, on Fleet 2 was 70.944 tons/month with the fuel consumption of 11.460,38 liter, on Fleet 3 was 68.885 bcm/month with the fuel consumption of 9.611,94 liter, Fleet 4 was 68.885 bcm/month with the fuel consumption of 11.907,19 liter. Whereas, in the field the realization of overburden and coal getting production in march of Fleet 1 was 55.403,23 bcm/month, Fleet 2 was 51.907,52 tons/month, Fleet 3 was 18.259,34 bcm/month, Fleet 4 was 56.582,92 bcm/month. The planned fuel ratio on Fleet 1 was 0,17 liter/bcm, Fleet 2 was 0,16 liter/tons, Fleet 3 was 0,14 liter/bcm and Fleet 4 was 0,17 liter/bcm while the actual fuel ratio on Fleet 1 was 0,18 liter/bcm, Fleet 2 was 0,20 liter/tons, Fleet 3 was 0,16 liter/bcm, Fleet 4 was 0,18 liter/bcm and the fuel ratio difference on Fleet 1 was 0,01 liter/bcm, Fleet 2 was 0,04 liter/tons, Fleet 3 was 0,02 liter/bcm and Fleet 4 was 0,01 liter/bcm. The factors affecting the production loose opportunity from the tool working hour was breakdown, slippery, rain and wait other unit. The total cost spent by the company for the overall fuel consumption was Rp 428.989.792,00 while the overall loss was Rp 45.989.837,74 in March.","PeriodicalId":44877,"journal":{"name":"Mineral Economics","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mineral Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33019/mineral.v8i1.4097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study analyzed the fuel ratio in mining projects to determine the factors that affected loose opportunity and the profit or losses encountered by the company. This analysis process was conduted by determining the target and realization of production where the overburden and coal getting production target in March on Fleet 1 was 68.885 bcm/month with the fuel consumption of 11.907,19 liter, on Fleet 2 was 70.944 tons/month with the fuel consumption of 11.460,38 liter, on Fleet 3 was 68.885 bcm/month with the fuel consumption of 9.611,94 liter, Fleet 4 was 68.885 bcm/month with the fuel consumption of 11.907,19 liter. Whereas, in the field the realization of overburden and coal getting production in march of Fleet 1 was 55.403,23 bcm/month, Fleet 2 was 51.907,52 tons/month, Fleet 3 was 18.259,34 bcm/month, Fleet 4 was 56.582,92 bcm/month. The planned fuel ratio on Fleet 1 was 0,17 liter/bcm, Fleet 2 was 0,16 liter/tons, Fleet 3 was 0,14 liter/bcm and Fleet 4 was 0,17 liter/bcm while the actual fuel ratio on Fleet 1 was 0,18 liter/bcm, Fleet 2 was 0,20 liter/tons, Fleet 3 was 0,16 liter/bcm, Fleet 4 was 0,18 liter/bcm and the fuel ratio difference on Fleet 1 was 0,01 liter/bcm, Fleet 2 was 0,04 liter/tons, Fleet 3 was 0,02 liter/bcm and Fleet 4 was 0,01 liter/bcm. The factors affecting the production loose opportunity from the tool working hour was breakdown, slippery, rain and wait other unit. The total cost spent by the company for the overall fuel consumption was Rp 428.989.792,00 while the overall loss was Rp 45.989.837,74 in March.
期刊介绍:
Mineral Economics – Raw Materials Report is an international multidisciplinary journal focused on economics and policy issues in the minerals metals and mining industries. The journal exists to improve the understanding of economic social environmental and political implications of natural resources. The main focus is on non-fuel minerals metals and the mining industry and its role in society.Mineral Economics is widening its scope and particularly invites papers on: Socio-economic aspects of mining e.g. social license to operate indigenous peoples theory of change Materials for the Green transition e.g. battery metals ICT elements policies to secure supply of these elements Minerals in the periphery e.g. the Arctic deep-seabed and space Mineral Economics serves as a platform for academics industry practitioners decision makers and other experts who want to share perspectives and knowledge about natural resources.A wide range of topics have traditionally been covered including among others: mineral market analysis exploration and development resource availability market development price formation international trade environmental policy sustainability issues competition issues.Mineral Economics is a joint project of Lule? University of Technology and R?varugruppen Ekonomisk F?rening the organization which founded the journal Raw Materials Report in 1981