Early Goal-Directed Therapy Using FloTrac/EV1000 Platform for Hemodynamic Optimization to Improve Perioperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

{"title":"Early Goal-Directed Therapy Using FloTrac/EV1000 Platform for Hemodynamic Optimization to Improve Perioperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"","doi":"10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.10.13893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the efficacy of early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) based on the FloTrac/EV1000 platform versus standard care to improve perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Materials and Methods: Forty patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were randomized to the Control or EGDT group. The Control group was managed to achieve a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 65 to 90 mmHg, a central venous pressure of 8 to 12 mmHg, a urine output of 0.5 mL/kg/h or more, and an SpO₂ of more than 95%. The EGDT group was managed to achieve similar goals using information from the FloTrac/ EV1000 platform by receiving fluid to maintain stroke volume variation (SVV) of less than 13%, inotropic drugs to achieve a cardiac index (CI) of 2.2 to 4.0 L/min/m⁻², and/or vasoactive drugs to achieve a systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) of 1,600 to 2,500 dynes·s/cm⁻⁵/m². Results: There were 20 patients in each group. The EGDT group received more colloid (p=0.035). The MAP and SVRI of both groups were comparable. The SVV of the Control group was higher (p=0.002), while the CI of the EGDT group was higher (p<0.001). The EGDT group had a shorter intubated time and a shorter stay in the ICU, with a mean difference of –3.95 h (95% CI –7.85 to –0.05, p=0.047) and –14.75 h (95% CI –25.38 to –4.12, p=0.008), respectively. The EGDT group had shorter hospital stays, albeit without significance (p=0.273). No postoperative complication was detected. Conclusion: Implementation of EGDT using FloTrac/EV1000, compared to conventional care, in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery results in shorter intubated time and shorter stay in the ICU. The shorter hospital stay did not achieve statistical significance. Keywords: Early goal-directed therapy; Major abdominal surgery; Perioperative outcome; Intubation time; ICU stay; Hospital stay","PeriodicalId":484667,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL ASSOCTATION OF THAILAND","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL ASSOCTATION OF THAILAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.10.13893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) based on the FloTrac/EV1000 platform versus standard care to improve perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Materials and Methods: Forty patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were randomized to the Control or EGDT group. The Control group was managed to achieve a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 65 to 90 mmHg, a central venous pressure of 8 to 12 mmHg, a urine output of 0.5 mL/kg/h or more, and an SpO₂ of more than 95%. The EGDT group was managed to achieve similar goals using information from the FloTrac/ EV1000 platform by receiving fluid to maintain stroke volume variation (SVV) of less than 13%, inotropic drugs to achieve a cardiac index (CI) of 2.2 to 4.0 L/min/m⁻², and/or vasoactive drugs to achieve a systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) of 1,600 to 2,500 dynes·s/cm⁻⁵/m². Results: There were 20 patients in each group. The EGDT group received more colloid (p=0.035). The MAP and SVRI of both groups were comparable. The SVV of the Control group was higher (p=0.002), while the CI of the EGDT group was higher (p<0.001). The EGDT group had a shorter intubated time and a shorter stay in the ICU, with a mean difference of –3.95 h (95% CI –7.85 to –0.05, p=0.047) and –14.75 h (95% CI –25.38 to –4.12, p=0.008), respectively. The EGDT group had shorter hospital stays, albeit without significance (p=0.273). No postoperative complication was detected. Conclusion: Implementation of EGDT using FloTrac/EV1000, compared to conventional care, in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery results in shorter intubated time and shorter stay in the ICU. The shorter hospital stay did not achieve statistical significance. Keywords: Early goal-directed therapy; Major abdominal surgery; Perioperative outcome; Intubation time; ICU stay; Hospital stay
使用FloTrac/EV1000平台进行血流动力学优化的早期目标导向治疗改善腹部大手术患者围手术期预后:一项随机对照试验
目的:比较基于FloTrac/EV1000平台的早期目标导向治疗(EGDT)与标准治疗在改善腹部大手术患者围手术期预后方面的疗效。材料与方法:40例腹部大手术患者随机分为对照组和EGDT组。对照组的平均动脉压(MAP)为65 ~ 90mmhg,中心静脉压为8 ~ 12mmhg,尿量为0.5 mL/kg/h以上,SpO₂大于95%。EGDT组使用来自FloTrac/ EV1000平台的信息,通过接受液体来维持中风容量变化(SVV)小于13%,肌力药物来实现心脏指数(CI) 2.2至4.0 L/min/m - 2,和/或血管活性药物来实现全身血管阻力指数(SVRI) 1600至2500达因·s/cm - 5 - m²,成功实现了类似的目标。结果:每组20例。EGDT组获得较多胶体(p=0.035)。两组的MAP和SVRI具有可比性。对照组SVV较高(p=0.002), EGDT组CI较高(p= 0.001)。EGDT组插管时间较短,ICU住院时间较短,平均差异分别为-3.95 h (95% CI -7.85 ~ -0.05, p=0.047)和-14.75 h (95% CI -25.38 ~ -4.12, p=0.008)。EGDT组住院时间较短,但无显著性差异(p=0.273)。无术后并发症。结论:与常规护理相比,使用FloTrac/EV1000实施EGDT可缩短腹部大手术患者的插管时间和ICU住院时间。住院时间较短无统计学意义。关键词:早期目标导向治疗;腹部大手术;围手术期的结果;插管时间;ICU停留;住院
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信