Comparison of Onset of Action, Intubating Conditions, and Recovery Characteristics of Rocuronium and Cisatracurium In Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery under General Anesthesia: A Prospective Randomized Control Trial

Swati Taneja, Amardeep Kaur, Shalvi Mahajan, Ankit Kansal
{"title":"Comparison of Onset of Action, Intubating Conditions, and Recovery Characteristics of Rocuronium and Cisatracurium In Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery under General Anesthesia: A Prospective Randomized Control Trial","authors":"Swati Taneja, Amardeep Kaur, Shalvi Mahajan, Ankit Kansal","doi":"10.18502/aacc.v9i5.13954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBD) have paved the way for the conduct of every known surgical procedure. However, the hunt for optimum NMD with appropriate intubating circumstances is continuous. Rocuronium and cisatracurium are amongst the newer NMBDs. We aim to compare the onset of action, intubating conditions, duration of action, and recovery features in a dose twice the ED95 in patients having abdominal surgery.
 Methods: A total 60 American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I and II adult patients were randomized equally into Group A and Group B. Group A received Inj. Rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg and Group B received Inj. Cisatracurium 0.10 mg/kg. We assessed the intubating conditions after ensuring jaw relaxation using both the clinical criteria and neuromuscular monitoring whereas onset time, duration of action and recovery time were assessed using neuromuscular monitoring only.
 Results: In Group A, a significant rapid onset of action of muscle relaxant was seen compared to Group B (2.4±0.30 mins versus 4.0±0.09 mins, p= 0.00). 93% patients had excellent intubating conditions in Group A compared to 73% patients in Group B (p= 0.038). The duration of action in Group A was 36.73±1.05 mins and in Group B was 47.40 ±1.33mins (p=0.00). Similarly, early mean duration of recovery was found in Group A-45.30±1.29mins versus Group B -57.77±1.19 mins, p= 0.00).
 Conclusion: Rocuronium provides rapid onset of action with excellent intubating conditions, and shorter duration of action with an early recovery time compared to cisatracurium.","PeriodicalId":480045,"journal":{"name":"Archives of anesthesiology and critical care","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of anesthesiology and critical care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/aacc.v9i5.13954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBD) have paved the way for the conduct of every known surgical procedure. However, the hunt for optimum NMD with appropriate intubating circumstances is continuous. Rocuronium and cisatracurium are amongst the newer NMBDs. We aim to compare the onset of action, intubating conditions, duration of action, and recovery features in a dose twice the ED95 in patients having abdominal surgery. Methods: A total 60 American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I and II adult patients were randomized equally into Group A and Group B. Group A received Inj. Rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg and Group B received Inj. Cisatracurium 0.10 mg/kg. We assessed the intubating conditions after ensuring jaw relaxation using both the clinical criteria and neuromuscular monitoring whereas onset time, duration of action and recovery time were assessed using neuromuscular monitoring only. Results: In Group A, a significant rapid onset of action of muscle relaxant was seen compared to Group B (2.4±0.30 mins versus 4.0±0.09 mins, p= 0.00). 93% patients had excellent intubating conditions in Group A compared to 73% patients in Group B (p= 0.038). The duration of action in Group A was 36.73±1.05 mins and in Group B was 47.40 ±1.33mins (p=0.00). Similarly, early mean duration of recovery was found in Group A-45.30±1.29mins versus Group B -57.77±1.19 mins, p= 0.00). Conclusion: Rocuronium provides rapid onset of action with excellent intubating conditions, and shorter duration of action with an early recovery time compared to cisatracurium.
一项前瞻性随机对照试验:罗库溴铵和顺阿曲库铵在全身麻醉下腹部手术患者的起效、插管条件和恢复特征的比较
背景:神经肌肉阻断药物(NMBD)已经为所有已知的外科手术铺平了道路。然而,在适当的插管环境下寻找最佳的NMD是持续的。罗库溴铵和顺阿曲库铵是较新的NMBDs。我们的目的是比较腹部手术患者在两倍ED95剂量下的起效、插管条件、作用持续时间和恢复特征。方法:将60例美国麻醉学学会(ASA) I、II级成年患者随机分为A组和b组。罗库溴铵0.6 mg/kg, B组注射。顺阿曲库铵0.10 mg/kg。我们使用临床标准和神经肌肉监测来评估确保颌骨松弛后的插管情况,而仅使用神经肌肉监测来评估发病时间、动作持续时间和恢复时间。 结果:A组肌肉松弛剂起效明显快于B组(2.4±0.30 min vs 4.0±0.09 min, p= 0.00)。A组93%患者插管条件良好,B组73%患者插管条件良好(p= 0.038)。A组作用时间36.73±1.05 min, B组作用时间47.40±1.33min (p=0.00)。同样,a组平均恢复时间早于B组(-57.77±1.19 min, p= 0.00);结论:与顺阿曲库铵相比,罗库溴铵起效快,插管条件好,作用时间短,恢复时间早。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信