Fluid Ecologies, Sovereignty, and Colonialism: Princely contestations over riverine islands in colonial India

IF 0.4 Q4 GEOGRAPHY
Mahendranath Sudhindranath, John Lourdusamy
{"title":"Fluid Ecologies, Sovereignty, and Colonialism: Princely contestations over riverine islands in colonial India","authors":"Mahendranath Sudhindranath, John Lourdusamy","doi":"10.21463/shima.208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses the disputes over riverine islands between two princely states in colonial southern India in the 19th and early 20th centuries. These disputes arose because of changes in the islands’ landmass caused by water movements. Such tidal temporalities challenged cartographic rigidities and the established notions of sovereignty of states. What were assumed to be sovereign, undisputed and infallible were unsettled by such hydrological power and the fluid ecologies involved. A set of challenges emanated from external concepts arising from colonialism which undermined the native geographical understanding of the land-water continuum due to the monetisation of land. This article makes a critical appraisal of this double challenge to the traditional understanding of fluid ecologies while also highlighting the counter challenges from the princely states. These contests were particularly pronounced as the princely states had considerable autonomy in internal matters of administration and thus differed from the rest of the colonial territory directly ruled by the British in India. The article contributes to the study of riverine islands by investigating the nature and fluidity of shifting islands, whose variation in temporal contexts has been barely acknowledged in Island Studies to date.","PeriodicalId":51896,"journal":{"name":"Shima-The International Journal of Research into Island Cultures","volume":"53 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shima-The International Journal of Research into Island Cultures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21463/shima.208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyses the disputes over riverine islands between two princely states in colonial southern India in the 19th and early 20th centuries. These disputes arose because of changes in the islands’ landmass caused by water movements. Such tidal temporalities challenged cartographic rigidities and the established notions of sovereignty of states. What were assumed to be sovereign, undisputed and infallible were unsettled by such hydrological power and the fluid ecologies involved. A set of challenges emanated from external concepts arising from colonialism which undermined the native geographical understanding of the land-water continuum due to the monetisation of land. This article makes a critical appraisal of this double challenge to the traditional understanding of fluid ecologies while also highlighting the counter challenges from the princely states. These contests were particularly pronounced as the princely states had considerable autonomy in internal matters of administration and thus differed from the rest of the colonial territory directly ruled by the British in India. The article contributes to the study of riverine islands by investigating the nature and fluidity of shifting islands, whose variation in temporal contexts has been barely acknowledged in Island Studies to date.
流体生态、主权和殖民主义:印度殖民时期关于河流岛屿的王公之争
本文分析了19世纪和20世纪初殖民时期印度南部两个土邦之间关于河流岛屿的争端。这些争端是由于海水运动引起岛屿陆地的变化而引起的。这种潮汐时间性挑战了制图的僵化和国家主权的既定概念。被认为是主权的、无可争议的和绝对正确的东西,被这种水文力量和所涉及的流体生态所动摇。一系列挑战来自殖民主义产生的外部概念,由于土地货币化,这些概念破坏了当地对土地-水连续体的地理理解。本文对流体生态学的传统认识面临的双重挑战进行了批判性评价,同时也强调了来自君主国家的反挑战。这些竞争尤其明显,因为这些土邦在内部管理事务上拥有相当大的自主权,因此与英国在印度直接统治的其他殖民地领土不同。本文通过调查移动岛屿的性质和流动性,为河流岛屿的研究做出了贡献,这些岛屿在时间背景下的变化在迄今为止的岛屿研究中几乎没有得到承认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Shima publishes: Theoretical and/or comparative studies of island, marine, lacustrine or riverine cultures Case studies of island, marine, lacustrine or riverine cultures Accounts of collaborative research and development projects in island, marine, lacustrine or riverine locations Analyses of "island-like" insular spaces (such as peninsular "almost islands," enclaves, exclaves and micronations) Analyses of fictional representations of islands, "islandness," oceanic, lacustrine and riverine issues In-depth "feature" reviews of publications, media texts, exhibitions, events etc. concerning the above Photo and Video Essays on any aspects of the above
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信