Mit mi Gerçek mi?: Türk Öğretmenler Arasında Nöromitlerin Yaygınlığı ve Yordayıcıları

IF 0.5 4区教育学 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Egitim Ve Bilim-Education and Science Pub Date : 2023-10-30 DOI:10.15390/eb.2023.12089

Yeliz Tunga, Kürşat Çağıltay

{"title":"Mit mi Gerçek mi?: Türk Öğretmenler Arasında Nöromitlerin Yaygınlığı ve Yordayıcıları","authors":"Yeliz Tunga, Kürşat Çağıltay","doi":"10.15390/eb.2023.12089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neuromyth is a concept used for misconceptions regarding the brain and its relation to learning. Identifying the prevalence of neuromyths is seen as the first step of dispelling them. The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence and predictors of neuromyths among teachers in Turkey. The educational neuromyths survey, which contains 19 general brain knowledge statements and 21 neuromyth statements, was conducted on 730 primary and secondary school teachers during the 2020-2021 educational year's spring semester. The findings showed that the most prevalent myths among teachers were learning styles, multiple intelligences, and an enriched environment. Hemispheric dominance, Mozart effect, BrainGYM, critical periods, fatty acids, learning while sleep, 10 % myths were believed more than 50% of teachers. The predictor analyses revealed that gender, teaching experience, reading popular science publications did not significantly predict the number of endorsed myths. Significant predictors were general brain knowledge, reading peer-reviewed journals, and taking neuroscience education. At the end of the study, recommendations for further research and practice are presented.","PeriodicalId":47058,"journal":{"name":"Egitim Ve Bilim-Education and Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egitim Ve Bilim-Education and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15390/eb.2023.12089","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neuromyth is a concept used for misconceptions regarding the brain and its relation to learning. Identifying the prevalence of neuromyths is seen as the first step of dispelling them. The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence and predictors of neuromyths among teachers in Turkey. The educational neuromyths survey, which contains 19 general brain knowledge statements and 21 neuromyth statements, was conducted on 730 primary and secondary school teachers during the 2020-2021 educational year's spring semester. The findings showed that the most prevalent myths among teachers were learning styles, multiple intelligences, and an enriched environment. Hemispheric dominance, Mozart effect, BrainGYM, critical periods, fatty acids, learning while sleep, 10 % myths were believed more than 50% of teachers. The predictor analyses revealed that gender, teaching experience, reading popular science publications did not significantly predict the number of endorsed myths. Significant predictors were general brain knowledge, reading peer-reviewed journals, and taking neuroscience education. At the end of the study, recommendations for further research and practice are presented.

查看原文本刊更多论文

神话还是现实？土耳其教师神经脊髓炎的发病率和预测因素

神经神话是一个概念，用于误解大脑及其与学习的关系。确定神经神话的普遍性被视为消除它们的第一步。本研究的目的是确定土耳其教师中神经神话的患病率和预测因素。教育神经神话调查在2020-2021学年春季学期对730名中小学教师进行了调查，其中包括19个一般大脑知识陈述和21个神经神话陈述。调查结果显示，教师中最普遍的误解是学习方式、多元智能和丰富的环境。大脑半球优势，莫扎特效应，脑损伤，关键时期，脂肪酸，边睡边学，10%的人相信神话，超过50%的老师相信。预测分析显示，性别、教学经验、阅读科普出版物并不能显著预测被认可的神话的数量。重要的预测因素是一般的大脑知识、阅读同行评审的期刊和接受神经科学教育。在研究的最后，提出了进一步研究和实践的建议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Egitim Ve Bilim-Education and Science EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Educación y Ciencia en el foco de publicación en línea con los objetivos; - Contribuyendo a la profesionalización de los docentes, - Un puente entre la teoría y la práctica, que proporciona una contribución directa a la práctica escolar y en el aula. - Ofreciendo una visión holística del ecosistema escolar, - Evaluar tanto los problemas educativos locales y actuales de Turquía se encuentra en sus propios estudios privados que examinan tanto la comparación internacional. Además, los siguientes estudios están cubiertos por la publicación de Educación y Ciencia. - Los estudios que examinan los problemas básicos y aplicaciones de la educación en preescolar, educación primaria y secundaria. - Esfuerzos para mejorar las competencias y estrategias educativas de profesores activos y otros profesionales - Todo tipo de estrategias y prácticas innovadoras de formación de docentes con el objetivo de hacer que los docentes candidatos sean docentes más calificados, examinar los modelos de formación docente y limitar la muestra al área de enseñanza relacionada - Metanálisis, análisis de contenido, análisis de perfil con grandes grupos de investigación o muestras - Todo tipo de actividades que pueden afectar el desarrollo individual, educativo, de carrera y social de los estudiantes en los niveles preescolar, elemental, intermedio y secundario. - Estudios que desarrollan y evalúan un nuevo modelo educativo, aunque teóricamente - Estudios que promuevan y apoyen la participación familiar en la educación. - Estudios multidisciplinares y estudios interdisciplinarios. - Estudios donde las herramientas de medición educativa son desarrolladas y probadas para su utilidad al mismo tiempo. - Estudios de integración tecnológica para ayudar a desarrollar aplicaciones educativas.