Machine learning and artificial intelligence models development in rainfall-induced landslide prediction

Q2 Decision Sciences
Hastuadi Harsa, Anistia Malinda Hidayat, Adi Mulsandi, Bambang Suprihadi, Roni Kurniawan, Muhammad Najib Habibie, Thahir Daniel Hutapea, Yunus S. Swarinoto, Erwin Eka Syahputra Makmur, Welly Fitria, Rahayu Sapta Sri Sudewi, Alfan Sukmana Praja
{"title":"Machine learning and artificial intelligence models development in rainfall-induced landslide prediction","authors":"Hastuadi Harsa, Anistia Malinda Hidayat, Adi Mulsandi, Bambang Suprihadi, Roni Kurniawan, Muhammad Najib Habibie, Thahir Daniel Hutapea, Yunus S. Swarinoto, Erwin Eka Syahputra Makmur, Welly Fitria, Rahayu Sapta Sri Sudewi, Alfan Sukmana Praja","doi":"10.11591/ijai.v12.i1.pp262-270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span lang=\"EN-US\">In Indonesia, rainfall is one crucial triggering factor for landslides. This paper aims to build landslide event prediction models using several machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithms. The algorithms were trained with two different methods. The input of the algorithms was precipitation data obtained from the global satellite mapping of precipitation satellite observation, and the target was landslide event occurrence data obtained from the Indonesian National Board for Disaster Management. Each algorithm provided some model candidates with different parameter settings for each method. As a result, there were 52 and 72 model candidates for both methods. The best model was then chosen from each method. The result shows that the model generated by generalized linear model was the best model for the first method and deep learning for the second one. Furthermore, the best models at each method gained 0.828 and 0.836 for the area under receiver operating characteristics curve, and their log-loss were 0.156 and 0.154. The second method, which used input data transformation, provided better performance.</span>","PeriodicalId":52221,"journal":{"name":"IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11591/ijai.v12.i1.pp262-270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Indonesia, rainfall is one crucial triggering factor for landslides. This paper aims to build landslide event prediction models using several machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithms. The algorithms were trained with two different methods. The input of the algorithms was precipitation data obtained from the global satellite mapping of precipitation satellite observation, and the target was landslide event occurrence data obtained from the Indonesian National Board for Disaster Management. Each algorithm provided some model candidates with different parameter settings for each method. As a result, there were 52 and 72 model candidates for both methods. The best model was then chosen from each method. The result shows that the model generated by generalized linear model was the best model for the first method and deep learning for the second one. Furthermore, the best models at each method gained 0.828 and 0.836 for the area under receiver operating characteristics curve, and their log-loss were 0.156 and 0.154. The second method, which used input data transformation, provided better performance.
降雨诱发滑坡预测中机器学习和人工智能模型的发展
在印度尼西亚,降雨是引发山体滑坡的一个关键因素。本文旨在利用几种机器学习和人工智能算法建立滑坡事件预测模型。算法用两种不同的方法进行训练。算法的输入是来自降水卫星观测全球卫星制图的降水数据,目标是来自印度尼西亚国家灾害管理委员会的滑坡事件发生数据。每种算法都为每种方法提供了一些具有不同参数设置的候选模型。结果,两种方法的候选模型分别有52和72个。然后从每种方法中选择最佳模型。结果表明,用广义线性模型生成的模型是第一种方法的最佳模型,用深度学习生成的模型是第二种方法的最佳模型。每种方法下的最佳模型的受者工作特性曲线下面积增益分别为0.828和0.836,对数损失分别为0.156和0.154。第二种方法使用输入数据转换,提供了更好的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence
IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Decision Sciences-Information Systems and Management
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信