Multi-directional communication between decision makers and environmental health researchers: a qualitative inquiry

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Carrie Leach, Amy J. Schulz, Nicholas Schroeck, Susie Lawrence, Sharon Sand, Guy Williams, Oluwatosin A. Bewaji, Robin Fuchs-Young
{"title":"Multi-directional communication between decision makers and environmental health researchers: a qualitative inquiry","authors":"Carrie Leach, Amy J. Schulz, Nicholas Schroeck, Susie Lawrence, Sharon Sand, Guy Williams, Oluwatosin A. Bewaji, Robin Fuchs-Young","doi":"10.1080/17477891.2023.2256727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has been three decades since key leaders gathered to pave a path toward healthier and more just environments and recommendations were made to improve communication between scientists and community stakeholders who can influence decision making. Since that time, community engaged research has flourished while building the capacity of researchers to engage in the work of making change to those environments has lagged. The purpose of this study was the development of guidelines to inform interactions between researchers and decision makers and influencers who participate in the policy change process. This community engaged, pragmatic and iterative inquiry includes insight from a review of existing resources and key informant interviews. Resulting guidelines were piloted, and formative evaluation by community stakeholders informed and resulted in refinement to the guidelines. Strategies for communicating and disseminating scientific evidence are presented as well as tactics that sensitise researchers to the nuances of policy makers’ realities so they may serve as a resource for dealing with complex information and decisions. We provide tactics and archived resources in an on-line toolkit that we have cultivated over time to foster effective communication between scientists and those who have a stake in ensuring that decisions are evidence informed.","PeriodicalId":47335,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Hazards-Human and Policy Dimensions","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Hazards-Human and Policy Dimensions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2023.2256727","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It has been three decades since key leaders gathered to pave a path toward healthier and more just environments and recommendations were made to improve communication between scientists and community stakeholders who can influence decision making. Since that time, community engaged research has flourished while building the capacity of researchers to engage in the work of making change to those environments has lagged. The purpose of this study was the development of guidelines to inform interactions between researchers and decision makers and influencers who participate in the policy change process. This community engaged, pragmatic and iterative inquiry includes insight from a review of existing resources and key informant interviews. Resulting guidelines were piloted, and formative evaluation by community stakeholders informed and resulted in refinement to the guidelines. Strategies for communicating and disseminating scientific evidence are presented as well as tactics that sensitise researchers to the nuances of policy makers’ realities so they may serve as a resource for dealing with complex information and decisions. We provide tactics and archived resources in an on-line toolkit that we have cultivated over time to foster effective communication between scientists and those who have a stake in ensuring that decisions are evidence informed.
决策者与环境卫生研究人员之间的多向沟通:一项定性调查
30年前,主要领导人聚集在一起,为更健康和更公正的环境铺平道路,并提出建议,以改善科学家与能够影响决策的社区利益攸关方之间的沟通。从那时起,社区参与的研究蓬勃发展,而建立研究人员参与改变这些环境的工作的能力却落后了。本研究的目的是制定指导方针,为参与政策变化过程的研究人员与决策者和影响者之间的互动提供信息。这种社区参与,务实和迭代的调查包括对现有资源的审查和关键信息提供者访谈的见解。由此产生的指导方针进行了试点,社区利益相关者进行了形成性评估,并对指导方针进行了改进。报告提出了沟通和传播科学证据的战略,以及使研究人员对决策者现实的细微差别敏感的策略,以便它们可以作为处理复杂信息和决策的资源。我们在一个在线工具包中提供策略和存档资源,这是我们长期培养的,目的是促进科学家和那些在确保决策是有证据依据的方面有利害关系的人之间的有效沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Environmental Hazards: Human and Policy Dimensions is an innovative, interdisciplinary and international research journal addressing the human and policy dimensions of hazards. The journal addresses the full range of hazardous events from extreme geological, hydrological, atmospheric and biological events, such as earthquakes, floods, storms and epidemics, to technological failures and malfunctions, such as industrial explosions, fires and toxic material releases. Environmental Hazards: Human and Policy Dimensions is the source of the new ideas in hazards and risk research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信