Cutaneous adverse drug reactions

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Thomas Bettuzzi , Paola Sanchez-Pena , Bénédicte Lebrun-Vignes
{"title":"Cutaneous adverse drug reactions","authors":"Thomas Bettuzzi ,&nbsp;Paola Sanchez-Pena ,&nbsp;Bénédicte Lebrun-Vignes","doi":"10.1016/j.therap.2023.09.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (ADRs) represent a heterogeneous field including various clinical patterns without specific features suggesting drug causality. </span>Maculopapular exanthema<span><span> and urticaria are the most common types of cutaneous ADR. Serious cutaneous ADRs, which may cause permanent sequelae or have fatal outcome, may represent 2% of all cutaneous ADR and must be quickly identified to guide their management. These serious reactions include bullous manifestations (epidermal necrolysis i.e. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis), drug reaction with </span>eosinophilia<span><span><span><span><span> and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP). Some risk factors for developing cutaneous ADRs have been identified, including immunosuppression, autoimmunity or genetic variants. All drugs can cause cutaneous ADRs, the most commonly implicated being antibiotics (especially </span>aminopenicillins<span> and sulfonamides), anticonvulsants, </span></span>allopurinol, </span>antineoplastic drugs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and </span>iodinated contrast media<span>. Pathophysiology<span> is related to immediate or delayed “idiosyncratic” immunologic mechanisms, i.e., usually not related to dose, and pharmacologic/toxic mechanisms, commonly dose-dependent and/or time-dependent. If an immuno-allergic mechanism is suspected, allergological explorations (including epicutaneous patch testing and/or intradermal test) are often possible to clarify drug causality, however these have a variable sensitivity according to the drug and to the ADR type. No in vivo or in vitro test can consistently confirm the drug causality. To determine the origin of a rash, a logical approach based on clinical characteristics, chronologic factors and elimination of differential diagnosis (especially infectious etiologies) is required, completed with a literature search. Reporting to pharmacovigilance system is therefore essential both to analyze drug causality at individual level, and to contribute to knowledge of the drug at population level, especially for serious cutaneous ADRs or in cases involving newly marketed drugs.</span></span></span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":23147,"journal":{"name":"Therapie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040595723001750","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (ADRs) represent a heterogeneous field including various clinical patterns without specific features suggesting drug causality. Maculopapular exanthema and urticaria are the most common types of cutaneous ADR. Serious cutaneous ADRs, which may cause permanent sequelae or have fatal outcome, may represent 2% of all cutaneous ADR and must be quickly identified to guide their management. These serious reactions include bullous manifestations (epidermal necrolysis i.e. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP). Some risk factors for developing cutaneous ADRs have been identified, including immunosuppression, autoimmunity or genetic variants. All drugs can cause cutaneous ADRs, the most commonly implicated being antibiotics (especially aminopenicillins and sulfonamides), anticonvulsants, allopurinol, antineoplastic drugs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and iodinated contrast media. Pathophysiology is related to immediate or delayed “idiosyncratic” immunologic mechanisms, i.e., usually not related to dose, and pharmacologic/toxic mechanisms, commonly dose-dependent and/or time-dependent. If an immuno-allergic mechanism is suspected, allergological explorations (including epicutaneous patch testing and/or intradermal test) are often possible to clarify drug causality, however these have a variable sensitivity according to the drug and to the ADR type. No in vivo or in vitro test can consistently confirm the drug causality. To determine the origin of a rash, a logical approach based on clinical characteristics, chronologic factors and elimination of differential diagnosis (especially infectious etiologies) is required, completed with a literature search. Reporting to pharmacovigilance system is therefore essential both to analyze drug causality at individual level, and to contribute to knowledge of the drug at population level, especially for serious cutaneous ADRs or in cases involving newly marketed drugs.

皮肤药物不良反应
皮肤药物不良反应(ADRs)是一个异质性领域,包括各种临床模式,但没有表明药物因果关系的具体特征。大面积红斑和荨麻疹是最常见的皮肤药物不良反应类型。严重的皮肤 ADR 可能会导致永久性后遗症或致命后果,占所有皮肤 ADR 的 2%,必须迅速识别以指导治疗。这些严重反应包括大疱性表现(表皮坏死溶解症,即史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死溶解症)、伴有嗜酸性粒细胞增多和全身症状的药物反应(DRESS)和急性全身性泛发性脓疱病(AGEP)。已发现一些导致皮肤 ADR 的风险因素,包括免疫抑制、自身免疫或基因变异。所有药物都可能导致皮肤 ADR,最常见的药物包括抗生素(尤其是氨基青霉素类和磺胺类)、抗惊厥药、别嘌呤醇、抗肿瘤药、非甾体抗炎药和碘化造影剂。病理生理学与直接或延迟的 "特异性 "免疫机制(即通常与剂量无关)和药理/毒性机制(通常为剂量依赖性和/或时间依赖性)有关。如果怀疑是免疫过敏机制,通常可以通过过敏学检查(包括表皮斑贴试验和/或皮内试验)来明确药物的因果关系,但这些检查的敏感性因药物和 ADR 类型而异。任何体内或体外试验都无法始终如一地确认药物的因果关系。要确定皮疹的起因,需要根据临床特征、时间因素和排除鉴别诊断(尤其是感染性病因)的逻辑方法,并进行文献检索。因此,向药物警戒系统报告至关重要,这样既能分析个体层面的药物因果关系,又能增进群体层面的药物知识,尤其是对于严重的皮肤不良反应或涉及新上市药物的病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapie
Therapie 医学-药学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
132
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Thérapie is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to Clinical Pharmacology, Therapeutics, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacovigilance, Addictovigilance, Social Pharmacology, Pharmacoepidemiology, Pharmacoeconomics and Evidence-Based-Medicine. Thérapie publishes in French or in English original articles, general reviews, letters to the editor reporting original findings, correspondence relating to articles or letters published in the Journal, short articles, editorials on up-to-date topics, Pharmacovigilance or Addictovigilance reports that follow the French "guidelines" concerning good practice in pharmacovigilance publications. The journal also publishes thematic issues on topical subject. The journal is indexed in the main international data bases and notably in: Biosis Previews/Biological Abstracts, Embase/Excerpta Medica, Medline/Index Medicus, Science Citation Index.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信