Assessing the Effect of Ketamine on Suprarefractory Status Epilepticus Requires Appropriately Designed Cohort Studies

Josef Finsterer, Craig A. Press, Mackenzie N. DeVine, Sharon E. Gordon
{"title":"Assessing the Effect of Ketamine on Suprarefractory Status Epilepticus Requires Appropriately Designed Cohort Studies","authors":"Josef Finsterer, Craig A. Press, Mackenzie N. DeVine, Sharon E. Gordon","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-28.6.585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To the Editor.—I read with interest the article by DeVine et al1 on 3 pediatric patients with suprarefractory status epileptics (SRSE): patient 1, age 29 days, with traumatic brain injury; patient 2, age 52 days, with ischemic stroke due to venous malformation; and patient 3, age 60 days, with hypoxic brain injury, who benefited from ketamine continuously administered during 5 days in addition to a number of other antiseizure drugs. It was concluded that continuous ketamine infusion should be considered in SRSE.1 The study is compelling but has limitations that should be discussed.The main limitation of the study is the design. It is not possible to draw general conclusions from 3 patients. To assess the effect of a medication a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial would be desirable. It is also mandatory that the size of the verum group be large enough to allow comparison with healthy controls or a control population with the disease.Because the effect of ketamine may strongly depend on the underlying cause of epilepsy, on comorbidities, and on the current medication, it is mandatory to know the underlying cause of epilepsy and the comorbidities of the 3 included patients. Patient 1 had severe hypoglycemia throughout hospitalization.1 How was hypoglycemia ruled out as the driver of the SRSE? Regarding the cause of epilepsy, we should know how genetic causes of epilepsy were ruled out.We disagree with the notion that the index study is the first in which continuous ketamine infusions have been used to treat SRSE.1 Continuous ketamine has been previously used to treat SRSE.3Not sufficiently discussed in the study are the side effects of ketamine. Although it is generally well tolerated, ketamine can exhibit severe side effects in single patients, such as delirium, headache, hallucinations, nausea, vomiting, arterial hypertension, and abdominal compartment syndrome.2,3There is no mention that ketamine is not effective in each patient with status epilepticus. In a study of 69 pediatric patients with RSE, seizure termination could be achieved in only 46%, seizure reduction in 28%, and no change was observed in 26%.3 In a study of 11 adult patients with status epilepticus, permanent status epilepticus control could be achieved in only 27% of patients.4 In a study of 68 adult patients with SRSE, complete cessation of SRSE could be achieved in 63% of cases.5Regarding the patient with ischemic stroke, we should know the initial treatment of ischemic stroke, particularly whether or not the patient underwent thrombolysis or thrombectomy and to what degree the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score changed before and after acute therapy.A treatment of status epilepticus, including RSE and SRSE, that has not been applied and discussed is the ketogenic diet. From ketone bodies it is known that they have an antiseizure effect and it would be interesting to know if ketamine plus ketogenic diet potentiates the antiseizure effect of ketamine. Although the ketogenic diet is usually well tolerated, it may have side effects in single patients.Overall, the interesting study has limitations that put the results and their interpretation into perspective. Addressing these issues would strengthen the conclusions and could improve the status of the study. Assessing the effect of ketamine on SRSE requires appropriately designed cohort studies.Author’s Response: We thank Dr Finsterer for his comments in the Letter to the Editor in response to our article summarizing our center’s experience with the use of ketamine for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and superrefractory status epilepticus (SRSE) in young infants. We agree that broad conclusions about the efficacy and safety of ketamine for status epilepticus will require further investigation. However, multicenter randomized studies for the treatment of status epilepticus in very young patients are unlikely to occur in the near future. Currently, there are no ongoing clinical trials evaluating the use of ketamine for RSE in children on Clinicaltrials.gov (searched August 6, 2023). The publication of case series and larger cohorts provides critical knowledge from real-world experiences treating status epilepticus in specific populations. This includes the larger cohort of patients published after this manuscript was accepted.We agree with Dr Finsterer’s point that understanding the underlying etiology is critical to interpreting response to any therapy. In the cases presented, given the rarity of the clinical scenarios we were describing, we limited details intentionally to avoid providing details that would risk identifying patients. Hypoglycemia was managed for the first patient with dextrose infusions; the time course of the seizures and presence outside of the hypoglycemia were more consistent with acute symptomatic seizures secondary to inflicted trauma. All cases had a proximate injury to provoke the episode of status epilepticus, and genetic evaluations were not necessary at the time. Regarding the specifics of the patient with ischemic stroke, this was related to a vascular malformation and not due to an acute end vessel occlusion. Use of thrombolytics or mechanical thrombectomy was not indicated. The Pediatric National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale is validated in children ages 2 to 18 years, but it is not intended for use in infants.We did not include a thorough discussion of potential adverse reactions to ketamine in our discussion and appreciate the attention Dr Finsterer brought to this. We discussed adverse events that were noted and described the presence or absence of some common adverse reactions reported with ketamine. Further, we agree that the efficacy of ketamine for RSE and SRSE in different clinical scenarios needs further study ­because not all patients in our series had a complete or sustained response.Research to understand the role of bolus and infusions of ketamine in the treatment of SE in children is essential given the expanding use of ketamine for the treatment of seizures in children.","PeriodicalId":22794,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5863/1551-6776-28.6.585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To the Editor.—I read with interest the article by DeVine et al1 on 3 pediatric patients with suprarefractory status epileptics (SRSE): patient 1, age 29 days, with traumatic brain injury; patient 2, age 52 days, with ischemic stroke due to venous malformation; and patient 3, age 60 days, with hypoxic brain injury, who benefited from ketamine continuously administered during 5 days in addition to a number of other antiseizure drugs. It was concluded that continuous ketamine infusion should be considered in SRSE.1 The study is compelling but has limitations that should be discussed.The main limitation of the study is the design. It is not possible to draw general conclusions from 3 patients. To assess the effect of a medication a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial would be desirable. It is also mandatory that the size of the verum group be large enough to allow comparison with healthy controls or a control population with the disease.Because the effect of ketamine may strongly depend on the underlying cause of epilepsy, on comorbidities, and on the current medication, it is mandatory to know the underlying cause of epilepsy and the comorbidities of the 3 included patients. Patient 1 had severe hypoglycemia throughout hospitalization.1 How was hypoglycemia ruled out as the driver of the SRSE? Regarding the cause of epilepsy, we should know how genetic causes of epilepsy were ruled out.We disagree with the notion that the index study is the first in which continuous ketamine infusions have been used to treat SRSE.1 Continuous ketamine has been previously used to treat SRSE.3Not sufficiently discussed in the study are the side effects of ketamine. Although it is generally well tolerated, ketamine can exhibit severe side effects in single patients, such as delirium, headache, hallucinations, nausea, vomiting, arterial hypertension, and abdominal compartment syndrome.2,3There is no mention that ketamine is not effective in each patient with status epilepticus. In a study of 69 pediatric patients with RSE, seizure termination could be achieved in only 46%, seizure reduction in 28%, and no change was observed in 26%.3 In a study of 11 adult patients with status epilepticus, permanent status epilepticus control could be achieved in only 27% of patients.4 In a study of 68 adult patients with SRSE, complete cessation of SRSE could be achieved in 63% of cases.5Regarding the patient with ischemic stroke, we should know the initial treatment of ischemic stroke, particularly whether or not the patient underwent thrombolysis or thrombectomy and to what degree the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score changed before and after acute therapy.A treatment of status epilepticus, including RSE and SRSE, that has not been applied and discussed is the ketogenic diet. From ketone bodies it is known that they have an antiseizure effect and it would be interesting to know if ketamine plus ketogenic diet potentiates the antiseizure effect of ketamine. Although the ketogenic diet is usually well tolerated, it may have side effects in single patients.Overall, the interesting study has limitations that put the results and their interpretation into perspective. Addressing these issues would strengthen the conclusions and could improve the status of the study. Assessing the effect of ketamine on SRSE requires appropriately designed cohort studies.Author’s Response: We thank Dr Finsterer for his comments in the Letter to the Editor in response to our article summarizing our center’s experience with the use of ketamine for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and superrefractory status epilepticus (SRSE) in young infants. We agree that broad conclusions about the efficacy and safety of ketamine for status epilepticus will require further investigation. However, multicenter randomized studies for the treatment of status epilepticus in very young patients are unlikely to occur in the near future. Currently, there are no ongoing clinical trials evaluating the use of ketamine for RSE in children on Clinicaltrials.gov (searched August 6, 2023). The publication of case series and larger cohorts provides critical knowledge from real-world experiences treating status epilepticus in specific populations. This includes the larger cohort of patients published after this manuscript was accepted.We agree with Dr Finsterer’s point that understanding the underlying etiology is critical to interpreting response to any therapy. In the cases presented, given the rarity of the clinical scenarios we were describing, we limited details intentionally to avoid providing details that would risk identifying patients. Hypoglycemia was managed for the first patient with dextrose infusions; the time course of the seizures and presence outside of the hypoglycemia were more consistent with acute symptomatic seizures secondary to inflicted trauma. All cases had a proximate injury to provoke the episode of status epilepticus, and genetic evaluations were not necessary at the time. Regarding the specifics of the patient with ischemic stroke, this was related to a vascular malformation and not due to an acute end vessel occlusion. Use of thrombolytics or mechanical thrombectomy was not indicated. The Pediatric National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale is validated in children ages 2 to 18 years, but it is not intended for use in infants.We did not include a thorough discussion of potential adverse reactions to ketamine in our discussion and appreciate the attention Dr Finsterer brought to this. We discussed adverse events that were noted and described the presence or absence of some common adverse reactions reported with ketamine. Further, we agree that the efficacy of ketamine for RSE and SRSE in different clinical scenarios needs further study ­because not all patients in our series had a complete or sustained response.Research to understand the role of bolus and infusions of ketamine in the treatment of SE in children is essential given the expanding use of ketamine for the treatment of seizures in children.
评估氯胺酮对超难治性癫痫持续状态的影响需要适当设计的队列研究
致编辑。我饶有兴趣地阅读了DeVine等人关于3例难治性癫痫状态(SRSE)患儿的文章:患者1,年龄29天,外伤性脑损伤;患者2,年龄52天,因静脉畸形缺血性脑卒中;患者3,年龄60天,患有缺氧性脑损伤,连续服用氯胺酮5天,同时服用其他抗癫痫药物。结论是,在srse中应考虑持续输注氯胺酮1 .该研究令人信服,但也存在值得讨论的局限性。本研究的主要局限性在于设计。不可能从3例患者中得出一般性结论。为了评估药物的效果,需要进行多中心、前瞻性、随机对照试验。verum组的规模也必须足够大,以便与健康对照或患有该疾病的对照人群进行比较。由于氯胺酮的效果可能在很大程度上取决于癫痫的潜在原因、合并症和目前的药物,因此必须了解3名纳入研究的患者的癫痫的潜在原因和合并症。患者1在住院期间出现严重低血糖如何排除低血糖是SRSE的驱动因素?关于癫痫的病因,我们应该知道癫痫的遗传原因是如何被排除的。我们不同意指数研究是第一个使用连续氯胺酮输注治疗重度抑郁发作的概念。1连续氯胺酮以前曾用于治疗重度抑郁发作。3在研究中没有充分讨论氯胺酮的副作用。虽然氯胺酮通常耐受性良好,但在单个患者中会出现严重的副作用,如谵妄、头痛、幻觉、恶心、呕吐、动脉高血压和腹腔隔室综合征。2,3没有提到氯胺酮不是对每一个癫痫持续状态患者都有效。在一项对69例小儿RSE患者的研究中,只有46%的患者癫痫发作终止,28%的患者癫痫发作减少,26%的患者癫痫发作无变化在一项对11名患有癫痫持续状态的成年患者的研究中,只有27%的患者能够获得永久性的癫痫持续状态控制在一项对68名SRSE成年患者的研究中,63%的病例可以完全停止SRSE。5对于缺血性脑卒中患者,我们应该了解缺血性脑卒中的初始治疗情况,特别是患者是否进行了溶栓或取栓,以及急性治疗前后美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分的变化程度。一种治疗癫痫持续状态的方法,包括RSE和SRSE,尚未应用和讨论的是生酮饮食。酮体有抗癫痫的作用如果氯胺酮加生酮饮食能增强氯胺酮的抗癫痫作用将会很有趣。虽然生酮饮食通常耐受性良好,但在单个患者中可能有副作用。总的来说,这项有趣的研究有局限性,这使得研究结果和对结果的解释变得正确。处理这些问题将加强结论,并可改善这项研究的地位。评估氯胺酮对SRSE的影响需要适当设计的队列研究。作者回复:我们感谢Finsterer博士在给编辑的信中对我们的文章的评论,该文章总结了我们中心使用氯胺酮治疗幼儿难治性癫痫持续状态(RSE)和超难治性癫痫持续状态(SRSE)的经验。我们同意,关于氯胺酮治疗癫痫持续状态的有效性和安全性的广泛结论需要进一步的研究。然而,在非常年轻的患者中治疗癫痫持续状态的多中心随机研究在不久的将来不太可能发生。目前,在临床试验网站(Clinicaltrials.gov)上没有正在进行的临床试验评估氯胺酮对儿童RSE的使用。出版的病例系列和更大的队列提供了关键的知识,从现实世界的经验,治疗癫痫持续状态在特定人群。这包括在本文被接受后发表的更大的患者队列。我们同意Finsterer博士的观点,即了解潜在的病因对于解释对任何治疗的反应至关重要。在这些案例中,考虑到我们所描述的临床场景的罕见性,我们有意限制了细节,以避免提供可能导致识别患者的细节。第一位患者通过葡萄糖输注治疗低血糖;癫痫发作的时间过程和低血糖以外的存在更符合外伤继发的急性症状性癫痫发作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信