Efficacy and safety of utidelone for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer who have failed standard second-line treatment: A phase 2 clinical trial (BG01-1801)
Yuankai Shi , Gongyan Chen , Yanqiu Zhao , Jing Zhao , Lin Lin
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of utidelone for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer who have failed standard second-line treatment: A phase 2 clinical trial (BG01-1801)","authors":"Yuankai Shi , Gongyan Chen , Yanqiu Zhao , Jing Zhao , Lin Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.cpt.2023.10.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Chemotherapy remains the standard-of-care for many patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but acquired resistance presents challenges. The aim of this open-label, multicenter phase 2 clinical trial was to determine the efficacy and safety of utidelone, a novel genetically engineered epothilone analog and microtubule-stabilizing agent, as a third- or later-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients who had failed standard second-line treatment (including platinum-containing chemotherapy or targeted therapy) received utidelone (40 mg/m<sup>2</sup> via intravenous injection daily, day 1–5) every 21 days. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were the duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From March 12, 2019 to January 18, 2021, 26 pretreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC (100% of patients had received prior platinum and 65.4% patients had received prior taxane treatment) were enrolled (80.8% of patients had adenocarcinoma). At baseline, nine (34.6%) patients had received second-line treatment, 10 (38.5%) patients had received third-line treatment, and seven (26.9%) patients had received fourth- or later-line treatment. By the data cut-off date of August 10, 2021, the median follow-up was 7.49 months (range, 1.4–26.7 months). The ORR was 15.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.4%–34.9%) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) cohort (<em>N</em> = 26) and 19.0% (95% CI, 5.4%–41.9%) in the per-protocol (PP) cohort (<em>N</em> = 21). The disease control rate was 69.2% (95% CI, 48.2%–85.7%) and 81.0% (95% CI, 58.1%–94.6%) in the ITT and PP cohorts, respectively. The median DoR was 4.1 months (95% CI, 3.1–5.1 months) in the ITT cohort. The median PFS was 4.37 months (95% CI, 2.50–5.29 months) in the ITT cohort and 4.37 months (95% CI, 2.50–9.76 months) in the PP cohort. The median OS was not reached, and the 12-month OS rate was 69% (95% CI, 45.1%–84.1%). Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 38.5% of patients, and the most common was peripheral neuropathy (23.1%, all Grade 3), which was manageable with dose modifications.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this clinical trial, utidelone showed promising efficacy and had a manageable safety profile. Further clinical studies are warranted to confirm its role in NSCLC treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>No.NCT03693547; <span>https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93920,"journal":{"name":"Cancer pathogenesis and therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949713223000885/pdfft?md5=4f7f4f771b7361e58a706b4ed2e5e404&pid=1-s2.0-S2949713223000885-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer pathogenesis and therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949713223000885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Chemotherapy remains the standard-of-care for many patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but acquired resistance presents challenges. The aim of this open-label, multicenter phase 2 clinical trial was to determine the efficacy and safety of utidelone, a novel genetically engineered epothilone analog and microtubule-stabilizing agent, as a third- or later-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC.
Methods
Patients who had failed standard second-line treatment (including platinum-containing chemotherapy or targeted therapy) received utidelone (40 mg/m2 via intravenous injection daily, day 1–5) every 21 days. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were the duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.
Results
From March 12, 2019 to January 18, 2021, 26 pretreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC (100% of patients had received prior platinum and 65.4% patients had received prior taxane treatment) were enrolled (80.8% of patients had adenocarcinoma). At baseline, nine (34.6%) patients had received second-line treatment, 10 (38.5%) patients had received third-line treatment, and seven (26.9%) patients had received fourth- or later-line treatment. By the data cut-off date of August 10, 2021, the median follow-up was 7.49 months (range, 1.4–26.7 months). The ORR was 15.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.4%–34.9%) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) cohort (N = 26) and 19.0% (95% CI, 5.4%–41.9%) in the per-protocol (PP) cohort (N = 21). The disease control rate was 69.2% (95% CI, 48.2%–85.7%) and 81.0% (95% CI, 58.1%–94.6%) in the ITT and PP cohorts, respectively. The median DoR was 4.1 months (95% CI, 3.1–5.1 months) in the ITT cohort. The median PFS was 4.37 months (95% CI, 2.50–5.29 months) in the ITT cohort and 4.37 months (95% CI, 2.50–9.76 months) in the PP cohort. The median OS was not reached, and the 12-month OS rate was 69% (95% CI, 45.1%–84.1%). Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 38.5% of patients, and the most common was peripheral neuropathy (23.1%, all Grade 3), which was manageable with dose modifications.
Conclusions
In this clinical trial, utidelone showed promising efficacy and had a manageable safety profile. Further clinical studies are warranted to confirm its role in NSCLC treatment.