Identification of interferences in free thyroxin assay—establishment of acceptable recovery limits for the dilution test

IF 1.4
Ruggero Dittadi, Sabrina Lombino, Paolo Carraro
{"title":"Identification of interferences in free thyroxin assay—establishment of acceptable recovery limits for the dilution test","authors":"Ruggero Dittadi, Sabrina Lombino, Paolo Carraro","doi":"10.21037/jlpm-23-34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": One of the simplest and most effective methods to verify the presence of analytical interferences in immunoassays is the dilution test. Use of this test is generally not recommended in free T4 (fT4) immunoassays, but it has been previously successfully used for the detection of interferences. The aim of this study was to confirm the data previously published and to determine an acceptable range for recovery, beyond which the presence of interference can be considered probable. fT4 were measured with Access Free T4 assay (Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, CA, USA). After preliminary evaluation of this method’s performance in a dilution test of 13 samples of patients with different binding capacities, the acceptable range of recovery of the dilution test was evaluated using 121 analytically and clinically plausible specimens within the measurement range of the assay. Moreover, 44 cases were evaluated with inconsistent results among the measured thyroid hormones. The acceptability range (2.5th–97.5th percentile) of recovery was between 77.4% and 121.7%. In 23 of the 44 suspected cases evaluated, the result of dilution showed recoveries within the established acceptability range, and the value of fT4 was also confirmed on another analytical platform (Liason XL). In the 21 cases where the recoveries were outside the acceptability range, the concentrations measured on Liaison XL were instead markedly different from the Access method and showed probable interferences. In conclusion, it has been verified that the Access fT4 method allows to obtain an excellent recovery at the dilution test, at least up to the 1/10 dilution. The reference ranges established for the acceptability of recovery under non-interference conditions allow to identify a possible analytical interference in a simple and reproducible way.","PeriodicalId":92408,"journal":{"name":"Journal of laboratory and precision medicine","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of laboratory and precision medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jlpm-23-34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: One of the simplest and most effective methods to verify the presence of analytical interferences in immunoassays is the dilution test. Use of this test is generally not recommended in free T4 (fT4) immunoassays, but it has been previously successfully used for the detection of interferences. The aim of this study was to confirm the data previously published and to determine an acceptable range for recovery, beyond which the presence of interference can be considered probable. fT4 were measured with Access Free T4 assay (Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, CA, USA). After preliminary evaluation of this method’s performance in a dilution test of 13 samples of patients with different binding capacities, the acceptable range of recovery of the dilution test was evaluated using 121 analytically and clinically plausible specimens within the measurement range of the assay. Moreover, 44 cases were evaluated with inconsistent results among the measured thyroid hormones. The acceptability range (2.5th–97.5th percentile) of recovery was between 77.4% and 121.7%. In 23 of the 44 suspected cases evaluated, the result of dilution showed recoveries within the established acceptability range, and the value of fT4 was also confirmed on another analytical platform (Liason XL). In the 21 cases where the recoveries were outside the acceptability range, the concentrations measured on Liaison XL were instead markedly different from the Access method and showed probable interferences. In conclusion, it has been verified that the Access fT4 method allows to obtain an excellent recovery at the dilution test, at least up to the 1/10 dilution. The reference ranges established for the acceptability of recovery under non-interference conditions allow to identify a possible analytical interference in a simple and reproducible way.
游离甲状腺素测定中干扰物的鉴定——稀释试验可接受回收率的建立
稀释试验是验证免疫测定中分析干扰存在的最简单和最有效的方法之一。通常不建议在游离T4 (fT4)免疫测定中使用该试验,但以前已成功地用于检测干扰。这项研究的目的是确认先前公布的数据,并确定一个可接受的恢复范围,超过这个范围就可能存在干扰。fT4采用Access Free T4测定法(Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, CA, USA)测定。在对13个不同结合能力的患者样本进行稀释试验后,对该方法的性能进行了初步评估,并使用该试验测量范围内的121个分析和临床合理的样本评估了稀释试验的可接受回收率范围。此外,44例患者的甲状腺激素测量结果不一致。回收率可接受范围(2.5 ~ 97.5百分位)为77.4% ~ 121.7%。在评估的44例疑似病例中,有23例稀释结果显示回收率在既定的可接受范围内,fT4的值也在另一个分析平台(Liason XL)上得到确认。在21例回收率超出可接受范围的情况下,联络XL法测得的浓度与Access法测得的浓度存在明显差异,可能存在干扰。总之,已验证Access fT4方法可在稀释试验中获得极好的回收率,至少可达到1/10稀释。在无干扰条件下为回收率可接受性建立的参考范围允许以简单和可重复的方式识别可能的分析干扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信