Update on Identifying and Evaluating Quality Measures for Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Deepti Anbarasan, Stephen V. Faraone, Lenard A. Adler
{"title":"Update on Identifying and Evaluating Quality Measures for Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder","authors":"Deepti Anbarasan, Stephen V. Faraone, Lenard A. Adler","doi":"10.3928/00485713-20230911-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The limited recognition and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults has been studied in the research setting and addressed in the clinical education setting during recent years. Despite these efforts, health care professionals continue to struggle with the management of adult ADHD in everyday practice. To better evaluate and measure meaningful practice metrics, a set of 10 key quality measures (QMs) that can help improve health care outcomes in adult ADHD was identified using a combination of evidence-based literature reviews and expert consensus. Subsequently, these QMs were field-tested in a sample of 71,310 adult ADHD patients in the primary care setting and behavioral health clinics over the course of a decade to assess whether these measures were attained. The results allowed us to understand how the clinician approach to diagnosing and treating ADHD has evolved in the past few years and highlighted the ongoing challenges in practice variation by clinicians caring for patients with adult ADHD. In turn, this information also guides our understanding of the next steps needed to improve the quality of care provided to adults with ADHD in different care settings. Accordingly, the American Professional Society of ADHD and Related Disorders (APSARD) assembled a guidelines committee to create a set of clinical practice guidelines to provide practitioners with a standardized, evidence-based approach to diagnosing and treating ADHD in adults. [ Psychiatr Ann . 2023;53(10):444–448.]","PeriodicalId":20917,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Annals","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric Annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/00485713-20230911-02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The limited recognition and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults has been studied in the research setting and addressed in the clinical education setting during recent years. Despite these efforts, health care professionals continue to struggle with the management of adult ADHD in everyday practice. To better evaluate and measure meaningful practice metrics, a set of 10 key quality measures (QMs) that can help improve health care outcomes in adult ADHD was identified using a combination of evidence-based literature reviews and expert consensus. Subsequently, these QMs were field-tested in a sample of 71,310 adult ADHD patients in the primary care setting and behavioral health clinics over the course of a decade to assess whether these measures were attained. The results allowed us to understand how the clinician approach to diagnosing and treating ADHD has evolved in the past few years and highlighted the ongoing challenges in practice variation by clinicians caring for patients with adult ADHD. In turn, this information also guides our understanding of the next steps needed to improve the quality of care provided to adults with ADHD in different care settings. Accordingly, the American Professional Society of ADHD and Related Disorders (APSARD) assembled a guidelines committee to create a set of clinical practice guidelines to provide practitioners with a standardized, evidence-based approach to diagnosing and treating ADHD in adults. [ Psychiatr Ann . 2023;53(10):444–448.]
成人注意力缺陷/多动障碍质量评估方法的最新进展
近年来,人们对成人注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的有限识别和治疗进行了研究,并在临床教育环境中进行了讨论。尽管有这些努力,卫生保健专业人员仍然在日常实践中与成人多动症的管理作斗争。为了更好地评估和衡量有意义的实践指标,我们结合基于证据的文献综述和专家共识,确定了一套10个关键质量指标(QMs),这些指标可以帮助改善成人ADHD的医疗保健结果。随后,在初级保健机构和行为健康诊所的71310名成年ADHD患者样本中对这些QMs进行了10年的实地测试,以评估这些指标是否达到。研究结果让我们了解了在过去几年中临床医生诊断和治疗ADHD的方法是如何演变的,并强调了临床医生在照顾成人ADHD患者的实践变化中所面临的挑战。反过来,这些信息也指导我们了解下一步需要提高在不同护理环境中为患有多动症的成年人提供的护理质量。因此,美国ADHD及相关疾病专业协会(APSARD)组建了一个指导委员会,以创建一套临床实践指南,为从业人员提供一个标准化的、基于证据的方法来诊断和治疗成人ADHD。[精神病医生安。]2023; 53(10): 444 - 448。)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatric Annals
Psychiatric Annals PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信