{"title":"A Critical Biocultural Identity Framework","authors":"Christina T. Cavaliere, Julia R. Branstrator","doi":"10.1080/08941920.2023.2267499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractExtractive capitalism threatens biocultural diversity through the erosion of identity in the Anthropocene. The coastal community of Ketchikan, Alaska, while remote, contends with overtourism and economic dependence on the multinational conglomerate mass cruise industry. Travel restrictions during the COVID-19 lockdown temporarily removed ‘the company’ from the company town identity of Ketchikan. This provided unique research insights into social-ecological impacts and bioregional resilience. Residents of Ketchikan’s greater bioregion provided empirical insights into the industrialization of identity and perceived biocultural impacts through qualitative, semi-structured interviews. This research extends place identity by applying critical ecofeminist-posthumanistic epistemologies that analyze the structural power components of biocultural identities. The findings offer a critical biocultural identity framework comprising nine indicators that serve to substantiate emotions, affect, and sensoryscapes as subjugated knowledges while critiquing the capitalistic colonization of materialisms and the psyche. Future interventions incorporating this framework may inform social science strategies for the conservation of biocultural identity.Keywords: Biocultural identitybioregionconservationecofeminismposthumanismtourism AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the community of Ketchikan, Alaska for sharing their perspectives with the research team. Alaska Native and Ketchikan Indian Community participants did not speak on behalf of their respective nations. This research does not represent the vision, thoughts, or opinions of any sovereign nation. No funding was obtained or utilized.Ethical ApprovalInternal Review Board Approval granted from CSU on June 18, 2021.","PeriodicalId":48223,"journal":{"name":"Society & Natural Resources","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society & Natural Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2023.2267499","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AbstractExtractive capitalism threatens biocultural diversity through the erosion of identity in the Anthropocene. The coastal community of Ketchikan, Alaska, while remote, contends with overtourism and economic dependence on the multinational conglomerate mass cruise industry. Travel restrictions during the COVID-19 lockdown temporarily removed ‘the company’ from the company town identity of Ketchikan. This provided unique research insights into social-ecological impacts and bioregional resilience. Residents of Ketchikan’s greater bioregion provided empirical insights into the industrialization of identity and perceived biocultural impacts through qualitative, semi-structured interviews. This research extends place identity by applying critical ecofeminist-posthumanistic epistemologies that analyze the structural power components of biocultural identities. The findings offer a critical biocultural identity framework comprising nine indicators that serve to substantiate emotions, affect, and sensoryscapes as subjugated knowledges while critiquing the capitalistic colonization of materialisms and the psyche. Future interventions incorporating this framework may inform social science strategies for the conservation of biocultural identity.Keywords: Biocultural identitybioregionconservationecofeminismposthumanismtourism AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the community of Ketchikan, Alaska for sharing their perspectives with the research team. Alaska Native and Ketchikan Indian Community participants did not speak on behalf of their respective nations. This research does not represent the vision, thoughts, or opinions of any sovereign nation. No funding was obtained or utilized.Ethical ApprovalInternal Review Board Approval granted from CSU on June 18, 2021.
期刊介绍:
Society and Natural Resources publishes cutting edge social science research that advances understanding of the interaction between society and natural resources.Social science research is extensive and comes from a number of disciplines, including sociology, psychology, political science, communications, planning, education, and anthropology. We welcome research from all of these disciplines and interdisciplinary social science research that transcends the boundaries of any single social science discipline. We define natural resources broadly to include water, air, wildlife, fisheries, forests, natural lands, urban ecosystems, and intensively managed lands. While we welcome all papers that fit within this broad scope, we especially welcome papers in the following four important and broad areas in the field: 1. Protected area management and governance 2. Stakeholder analysis, consultation and engagement; deliberation processes; governance; conflict resolution; social learning; social impact assessment 3. Theoretical frameworks, epistemological issues, and methodological perspectives 4. Multiscalar character of social implications of natural resource management