Evaluating Onsite and Online Internship Mode Using Consumptive Metrics

Q2 Social Sciences
Mathew Nicho, Tarannum Parkar, Shini Girija
{"title":"Evaluating Onsite and Online Internship Mode Using Consumptive Metrics","authors":"Mathew Nicho, Tarannum Parkar, Shini Girija","doi":"10.4018/ijwltt.332244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper aims to assess the effectiveness between onsite and online internship mode by measuring the critical components of learning through the Kirkpatrick's ‘consumptive metrics' model. The primary goal of internship is to assist university students in their progression from the academic to a professional work environment. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted this process where it temporarily moved to online mode. Hence, the authors use Kirkpatrick's ‘consumptive metrics' (CM) for evaluating the learning resources consumed using two constructs namely ‘reaction' and ‘learning'. Using 21 onsite and 20 online intern reports, researchers objectively measured the difference in alignment of theory with practice between onsite and online mode. The research revealed that while the CM components namely ‘course satisfaction' and ‘training relevance' on the interns are similar for both modes, there is a considerable reduction in the effectiveness of internship in terms of the CM components namely the ‘training environment', ‘knowledge gained', and ‘career advancement' in an online mode.","PeriodicalId":39282,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijwltt.332244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper aims to assess the effectiveness between onsite and online internship mode by measuring the critical components of learning through the Kirkpatrick's ‘consumptive metrics' model. The primary goal of internship is to assist university students in their progression from the academic to a professional work environment. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted this process where it temporarily moved to online mode. Hence, the authors use Kirkpatrick's ‘consumptive metrics' (CM) for evaluating the learning resources consumed using two constructs namely ‘reaction' and ‘learning'. Using 21 onsite and 20 online intern reports, researchers objectively measured the difference in alignment of theory with practice between onsite and online mode. The research revealed that while the CM components namely ‘course satisfaction' and ‘training relevance' on the interns are similar for both modes, there is a considerable reduction in the effectiveness of internship in terms of the CM components namely the ‘training environment', ‘knowledge gained', and ‘career advancement' in an online mode.
使用消费指标评估现场和在线实习模式
本文旨在通过Kirkpatrick的“消费指标”模型来衡量学习的关键组成部分,从而评估现场实习模式和在线实习模式之间的有效性。实习的主要目标是帮助大学生从学术环境过渡到专业工作环境。然而,COVID-19大流行打乱了这一进程,它暂时转入在线模式。因此,作者使用Kirkpatrick的“消费指标”(CM)来评估使用两个结构即“反应”和“学习”消耗的学习资源。研究人员利用21份现场实习报告和20份在线实习报告,客观地衡量了现场实习模式和在线实习模式在理论与实践契合度方面的差异。研究发现,尽管两种模式下实习生的“课程满意度”和“培训相关性”这两项素质管理成分相似,但在在线模式下,实习生在“培训环境”、“获得的知识”和“职业发展”这三项素质管理成分方面的实习效率显著降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信