Post-operative cerebrospinal fluid leak: single-continuous versus double-breasted dural repair of myelomeningocele

IF 0.7 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Usman Daibu, Aliyu Muhammad Koko, Babagana Usman
{"title":"Post-operative cerebrospinal fluid leak: single-continuous versus double-breasted dural repair of myelomeningocele","authors":"Usman Daibu, Aliyu Muhammad Koko, Babagana Usman","doi":"10.1186/s41984-023-00240-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Myelomeningocele is the most common neural tube defect in our environment. Initial surgical management involves untethering and water-tight dural closure. Single-continuous dural repair is more straightforward and faster than the double-breasted repair, even though the latter offers more strength to the reconstructed dura as the repair is in two layers. Preference was given to single-continuous repair even though the two techniques were not compared in terms of post-operative cerebrospinal fluid leak. The aim of this study was to compare the frequency of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak following single-continuous versus double-breasted dural repair of myelomeningocele. Patients and methods This was a randomized prospective study that reviewed all patients that presented to Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital (UDUTH) Sokoto, Nigeria, with myelomeningocele who met the inclusion criteria. Fifty-four patients were enrolled into the study randomized into two groups of 27 patients each. Group 1 had single-continuous repair, while group 2 had double-breasted technique. Post-operatively, patients were assessed for post-operative cerebrospinal fluid leak and pseudomeningocele. Data collected were analysed using the statistical package for social sciences version 22.0. The value for significance was set at 0.05. Results The median age at presentation for both groups was 5 months. Both groups showed female preponderance with a female-to-male ratio of 1.3:1 and 1.7:1. Post-operative CSF leak occurred in 2(7.4%) patients in the single-continuous group compared to 3(11.1%) patients in the double-breasted group. Only 1(3.7%) patient in the single-continuous group developed pseudomeningocele and none in the double-breasted. Conclusion Dural repair technique of myelomeningocele does not influence the occurrence of post-operative cerebrospinal fluid leak.","PeriodicalId":72881,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian journal of neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41984-023-00240-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background Myelomeningocele is the most common neural tube defect in our environment. Initial surgical management involves untethering and water-tight dural closure. Single-continuous dural repair is more straightforward and faster than the double-breasted repair, even though the latter offers more strength to the reconstructed dura as the repair is in two layers. Preference was given to single-continuous repair even though the two techniques were not compared in terms of post-operative cerebrospinal fluid leak. The aim of this study was to compare the frequency of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak following single-continuous versus double-breasted dural repair of myelomeningocele. Patients and methods This was a randomized prospective study that reviewed all patients that presented to Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital (UDUTH) Sokoto, Nigeria, with myelomeningocele who met the inclusion criteria. Fifty-four patients were enrolled into the study randomized into two groups of 27 patients each. Group 1 had single-continuous repair, while group 2 had double-breasted technique. Post-operatively, patients were assessed for post-operative cerebrospinal fluid leak and pseudomeningocele. Data collected were analysed using the statistical package for social sciences version 22.0. The value for significance was set at 0.05. Results The median age at presentation for both groups was 5 months. Both groups showed female preponderance with a female-to-male ratio of 1.3:1 and 1.7:1. Post-operative CSF leak occurred in 2(7.4%) patients in the single-continuous group compared to 3(11.1%) patients in the double-breasted group. Only 1(3.7%) patient in the single-continuous group developed pseudomeningocele and none in the double-breasted. Conclusion Dural repair technique of myelomeningocele does not influence the occurrence of post-operative cerebrospinal fluid leak.
术后脑脊液泄漏:单排扣与双排扣硬脊膜修复脊髓脊膜膨出
摘要背景脊髓脊膜膨出是最常见的神经管缺损。最初的手术处理包括解开系带和水密硬脑膜闭合。单连续硬脑膜修复术比双排扣修复术更直接、更快速,尽管后者由于修复术分为两层,可以为重建的硬脑膜提供更多的强度。尽管两种技术在术后脑脊液泄漏方面没有进行比较,但仍优先考虑单次连续修复。本研究的目的是比较单排扣和双排扣硬脊膜修复脊髓脊膜膨出后脑脊液(CSF)泄漏的频率。患者和方法这是一项随机前瞻性研究,对尼日利亚索科托Usmanu Danfodiyo大学教学医院(UDUTH)收治的所有符合纳入标准的脊髓脊膜膨出患者进行了回顾性研究。54名患者被纳入研究,随机分为两组,每组27名患者。组1采用单连续修补术,组2采用双排扣修补术。术后评估患者术后脑脊液漏及假性脑膜膨出情况。收集的数据使用社会科学22.0版统计软件包进行分析。显著性值设为0.05。结果两组患者就诊时的中位年龄均为5个月。两组均呈现女性优势,男女比例分别为1.3:1和1.7:1。单排扣组术后2例(7.4%)患者发生脑脊液漏,双排扣组3例(11.1%)患者发生脑脊液漏。单连续组仅有1例(3.7%)发生假性脑膜膨出,双排扣组无一例。结论硬脊膜修补术对术后脑脊液漏的发生无影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信