Effects of biofloc technology on water quality and growth performance of Macrobrachium rosenbergii

IF 0.5 4区 农林科学 Q4 FISHERIES
Ma-ann Camarin, Alejandro Gonzaga, Jhumar Jamis, Adelaida Calpe
{"title":"Effects of biofloc technology on water quality and growth performance of <i>Macrobrachium rosenbergii</i>","authors":"Ma-ann Camarin, Alejandro Gonzaga, Jhumar Jamis, Adelaida Calpe","doi":"10.46989/001c.88899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to evaluate the effects of biofloc technology on the water quality and growth performance of Macrobrachium rosenbergii . The experiment was carried out over 165 days at the hatchery complex of the College of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Mindanao State University-Marawi, Philippines. Postlarvae of M. rosenbergii (0.011±0.05 g) were stocked in 18 circular tanks (1200 L) consisting of six treatments under biofloc and non-biofloc systems in a completely randomized experimental design with tapioca flour as the carbohydrate source. Commercial pelletized sinking prawn feed with three dietary protein levels, viz., 42, 38, and 35% were chosen as experimental feeds. Results of the present study show that the water parameters were within the optimum range required in the culture of freshwater prawns. However, biofloc technology (BFT) did not influence sediment and water samples’ dissolved oxygen, temperature, and pH values. On the other hand, total ammoniacal nitrogen (TAN) and nitrate showed significant variation ( p <0.05) among treatments, with higher values in the control treatment compared to the biofloc treatments. Moreover, the dietary protein level and carbohydrate addition had no significant effect on soil pH and organic carbon except for the soil total nitrogen value, where higher values were observed in the biofloc treatments. Furthermore, significantly higher mean prawn weight gain, net prawn yield, specific growth rate (SGR), and average daily weight gain (ADG) were recorded in the biofloc treatments compared to non-biofloc treatments. At the end of the culture period, there was 100% survival in all of the tanks. On the other hand, no significant variations were observed in feed conversion ratio (FCR) and protein efficiency ratio (PER) in the control treatment compared to the treatment with biofloc except in tanks using feed of 42% CP under the biofloc system. Therefore, based on the results of the present study, the use of BFT in the culture system of M. rosenbergii , helped reduce the protein percentage from 42 to 35, while maintaining the yield.","PeriodicalId":14704,"journal":{"name":"Israeli Journal of Aquaculture-bamidgeh","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israeli Journal of Aquaculture-bamidgeh","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46989/001c.88899","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of biofloc technology on the water quality and growth performance of Macrobrachium rosenbergii . The experiment was carried out over 165 days at the hatchery complex of the College of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Mindanao State University-Marawi, Philippines. Postlarvae of M. rosenbergii (0.011±0.05 g) were stocked in 18 circular tanks (1200 L) consisting of six treatments under biofloc and non-biofloc systems in a completely randomized experimental design with tapioca flour as the carbohydrate source. Commercial pelletized sinking prawn feed with three dietary protein levels, viz., 42, 38, and 35% were chosen as experimental feeds. Results of the present study show that the water parameters were within the optimum range required in the culture of freshwater prawns. However, biofloc technology (BFT) did not influence sediment and water samples’ dissolved oxygen, temperature, and pH values. On the other hand, total ammoniacal nitrogen (TAN) and nitrate showed significant variation ( p <0.05) among treatments, with higher values in the control treatment compared to the biofloc treatments. Moreover, the dietary protein level and carbohydrate addition had no significant effect on soil pH and organic carbon except for the soil total nitrogen value, where higher values were observed in the biofloc treatments. Furthermore, significantly higher mean prawn weight gain, net prawn yield, specific growth rate (SGR), and average daily weight gain (ADG) were recorded in the biofloc treatments compared to non-biofloc treatments. At the end of the culture period, there was 100% survival in all of the tanks. On the other hand, no significant variations were observed in feed conversion ratio (FCR) and protein efficiency ratio (PER) in the control treatment compared to the treatment with biofloc except in tanks using feed of 42% CP under the biofloc system. Therefore, based on the results of the present study, the use of BFT in the culture system of M. rosenbergii , helped reduce the protein percentage from 42 to 35, while maintaining the yield.
生物絮团技术对罗氏沼虾水质及生长性能的影响
本研究旨在评价生物絮团技术对罗氏沼虾水质和生长性能的影响。该实验在菲律宾棉兰老岛国立大学马拉维分校渔业与水产科学学院孵化场进行了165天。采用完全随机试验设计,以木薯粉为碳水化合物源,在生物絮团和非生物絮团体系下,将罗氏沼虾仔鱼(0.011±0.05 g)放入18个1200 L的圆形池中,共6个处理。选择饲粮蛋白质水平分别为42、38和35%的商品化沉虾饲料作为试验饲料。研究结果表明,水参数在淡水对虾养殖所需的最佳范围内。然而,生物絮团技术(BFT)对沉积物和水样的溶解氧、温度和pH值没有影响。另一方面,总氨态氮(TAN)和硝态氮在处理间差异显著(p <0.05),对照处理高于生物絮团处理。此外,饲粮蛋白质水平和碳水化合物添加量对土壤pH和有机碳没有显著影响,但土壤全氮值在生物絮团处理中较高。此外,与非生物絮团处理相比,生物絮团处理的对虾平均增重、净虾产量、特定生长率(SGR)和平均日增重(ADG)显著提高。在培养期结束时,所有的坦克都有100%的存活率。另一方面,除了在生物絮团体系下使用42% CP饲料的池中,对照处理的饲料转化率(FCR)和蛋白质效率(PER)与添加生物絮团处理相比没有显著变化。因此,根据本研究的结果,在罗氏沼虾培养体系中使用BFT有助于将蛋白质百分比从42%降低到35%,同时保持产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
49
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信