Geometry Representation Effectiveness in Improving Airfoil Aerodynamic Coefficient Prediction with Convolutional Neural Network

Q3 Decision Sciences
Arizal Akbar Zikri, Hanni Defianti, Wahyu Hidayat, Acep Purqon
{"title":"Geometry Representation Effectiveness in Improving Airfoil Aerodynamic Coefficient Prediction with Convolutional Neural Network","authors":"Arizal Akbar Zikri, Hanni Defianti, Wahyu Hidayat, Acep Purqon","doi":"10.30630/joiv.7.3.1577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many applications use symmetric or asymmetric airfoils, such as aircraft design, wind turbines, and heat transfer. Each airfoil has different aerodynamic coefficients. Obtaining the aerodynamic coefficients is a must to optimize the airfoil design. Engineers use various methods to get the airfoil aerodynamic coefficients. A prediction method is an approximation approach that effectively reduces time and cost. This article uses convolutional neural networks (CNN) to get approximation values of those coefficients. In CNN, we collect 8920 aerodynamic coefficients for 223 NACA 4 as labels in datasets by using XFOIL at and with varying angles of attacks starting to with increment of . The simulation results are compared to the experiment using E387 airfoil for validation. Then, airfoil geometries as part of input datasets were transformed into Grayscale and RGB images using the signed distance function (SDF) and mesh algorithm. Each airfoil representation was trained using an 80% dataset and tested using a 20% dataset with Adam as an optimizer to generate each prediction model using modified LeNet-5. We use three different layer depths in modified LeNet-5 to obtain the optimal layer number. There is no remarkable improvement when varying the depth layers, so four layers are used instead. Simulation results show that using an SDF with Fast Marching Method on CNN predicts the most effective for the airfoil’s lift, drag, and pitch moment coefficient with varying angles of attack simultaneously. One can extend the method by using SDF to recognize different flow conditions.","PeriodicalId":32468,"journal":{"name":"JOIV International Journal on Informatics Visualization","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOIV International Journal on Informatics Visualization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30630/joiv.7.3.1577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many applications use symmetric or asymmetric airfoils, such as aircraft design, wind turbines, and heat transfer. Each airfoil has different aerodynamic coefficients. Obtaining the aerodynamic coefficients is a must to optimize the airfoil design. Engineers use various methods to get the airfoil aerodynamic coefficients. A prediction method is an approximation approach that effectively reduces time and cost. This article uses convolutional neural networks (CNN) to get approximation values of those coefficients. In CNN, we collect 8920 aerodynamic coefficients for 223 NACA 4 as labels in datasets by using XFOIL at and with varying angles of attacks starting to with increment of . The simulation results are compared to the experiment using E387 airfoil for validation. Then, airfoil geometries as part of input datasets were transformed into Grayscale and RGB images using the signed distance function (SDF) and mesh algorithm. Each airfoil representation was trained using an 80% dataset and tested using a 20% dataset with Adam as an optimizer to generate each prediction model using modified LeNet-5. We use three different layer depths in modified LeNet-5 to obtain the optimal layer number. There is no remarkable improvement when varying the depth layers, so four layers are used instead. Simulation results show that using an SDF with Fast Marching Method on CNN predicts the most effective for the airfoil’s lift, drag, and pitch moment coefficient with varying angles of attack simultaneously. One can extend the method by using SDF to recognize different flow conditions.
几何表示在改进卷积神经网络翼型气动系数预测中的有效性
许多应用使用对称或非对称翼型,如飞机设计,风力涡轮机和传热。每个翼型都有不同的空气动力系数。获得气动系数是优化翼型设计的必要条件。工程师使用各种方法来获得翼型气动系数。预测方法是一种近似方法,可以有效地减少时间和成本。本文使用卷积神经网络(CNN)来获得这些系数的近似值。在CNN中,我们使用XFOIL在不同攻角开始以增量的方式收集了223 NACA 4的8920个气动系数作为数据集中的标签。仿真结果与E387翼型的实验结果进行了对比验证。然后,翼型几何形状作为输入数据集的一部分,使用签名距离函数(SDF)和网格算法转换为灰度和RGB图像。每个翼型表示使用80%的数据集进行训练,并使用20%的数据集进行测试,亚当作为优化器,使用修改后的LeNet-5生成每个预测模型。我们在改进的LeNet-5中使用三种不同的层深度来获得最优层数。当改变深度层时,没有明显的改善,所以使用四层代替。仿真结果表明,在CNN上使用快速进步法的SDF可以同时预测不同迎角下翼型的升力、阻力和俯仰力矩系数最有效。可以将该方法扩展为使用SDF来识别不同的流动条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JOIV International Journal on Informatics Visualization
JOIV International Journal on Informatics Visualization Decision Sciences-Information Systems and Management
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信