Text Summarization on Verdicts of Industrial Relations Disputes Using the Cross-Latent Semantic Analysis and Long Short-Term Memory

Q3 Decision Sciences
Galih Wasis Wicaksono, Muhammad Nafi Maula Hakim, Nur Hayatin, Nur Putri Hidayah, Tiara Intana Sari
{"title":"Text Summarization on Verdicts of Industrial Relations Disputes Using the Cross-Latent Semantic Analysis and Long Short-Term Memory","authors":"Galih Wasis Wicaksono, Muhammad Nafi Maula Hakim, Nur Hayatin, Nur Putri Hidayah, Tiara Intana Sari","doi":"10.30630/joiv.7.3.2052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The information presented in the documents regarding industrial relations disputes constitutes four legal disputes. However, too much information leads to difficulty for readers to find essential points highlighted in industrial relations dispute documents. This research aims to summarize automated documents of court decisions over industrial relations disputes with permanent legal force. This research involved 35 documents of court decisions obtained from Indonesia’s official Supreme Court website and employed an extractive summarization approach to summarize the documents by utilizing Cross Latent Semantic Analysis (CLSA) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) methods. The two methods are compared to obtain the best results CLSA was employed to analyze the connection between phrases, requiring the ordering of related words before they were converted into a complete summary. Then, the use of LSTM is combined with the Attention module to decoder and encoder the information entered so that it becomes a form that can be understood by the system and provides a variety of splitting of documents to be trained and tested to see the highest performance that the system can generate. The research has found out that the CLSA method gave a precision of 79.1%, recall score of 39.7%, and ROUGE-1 score of 50.9%, and the use of LSTM was able to improve the performance of the CLSA method with the results obtained 93.6%, recall score of 94.5 %, and ROUGE-1 score of 93.9% on the variation of splitting 95% training and 5% testing.","PeriodicalId":32468,"journal":{"name":"JOIV International Journal on Informatics Visualization","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOIV International Journal on Informatics Visualization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30630/joiv.7.3.2052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The information presented in the documents regarding industrial relations disputes constitutes four legal disputes. However, too much information leads to difficulty for readers to find essential points highlighted in industrial relations dispute documents. This research aims to summarize automated documents of court decisions over industrial relations disputes with permanent legal force. This research involved 35 documents of court decisions obtained from Indonesia’s official Supreme Court website and employed an extractive summarization approach to summarize the documents by utilizing Cross Latent Semantic Analysis (CLSA) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) methods. The two methods are compared to obtain the best results CLSA was employed to analyze the connection between phrases, requiring the ordering of related words before they were converted into a complete summary. Then, the use of LSTM is combined with the Attention module to decoder and encoder the information entered so that it becomes a form that can be understood by the system and provides a variety of splitting of documents to be trained and tested to see the highest performance that the system can generate. The research has found out that the CLSA method gave a precision of 79.1%, recall score of 39.7%, and ROUGE-1 score of 50.9%, and the use of LSTM was able to improve the performance of the CLSA method with the results obtained 93.6%, recall score of 94.5 %, and ROUGE-1 score of 93.9% on the variation of splitting 95% training and 5% testing.
基于交叉潜语义分析和长短期记忆的劳资关系判决书文本摘要
文件中提供的有关劳资关系纠纷的信息构成四种法律纠纷。然而,过多的信息导致读者难以找到在劳资关系纠纷文件中强调的要点。本研究旨在总结具有永久法律效力的劳资关系纠纷法院判决的自动化文件。本研究涉及从印度尼西亚最高法院官方网站获得的35份法院判决文件,采用抽取摘要的方法,利用交叉潜在语义分析(CLSA)和长短期记忆(LSTM)方法对文件进行总结。对比两种方法得到最好的结果,里昂证券用于分析短语之间的联系,需要对相关单词进行排序,然后才能将其转换成完整的摘要。然后,将LSTM的使用与Attention模块相结合,对输入的信息进行解码器和编码器,使其成为系统可以理解的形式,并提供各种文档分割以进行训练和测试,以查看系统可以生成的最高性能。研究发现,里昂证券方法的准确率为79.1%,召回率为39.7%,ROUGE-1得分为50.9%,LSTM的使用可以提高里昂证券方法的性能,在分割95%训练和5%测试的变异上,结果为93.6%,召回率为94.5%,ROUGE-1得分为93.9%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JOIV International Journal on Informatics Visualization
JOIV International Journal on Informatics Visualization Decision Sciences-Information Systems and Management
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信