Quantifying the robustness of a Bayesian Belief Network in the context of Unmanned Aerial System threat prediction

Laura Middeldorp, Kerry Malone, Wouter Noordkamp
{"title":"Quantifying the robustness of a Bayesian Belief Network in the context of Unmanned Aerial System threat prediction","authors":"Laura Middeldorp, Kerry Malone, Wouter Noordkamp","doi":"10.1177/15485129231206825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unmanned Aerial Systems (UASs), or drones, are becoming increasingly available to the general public. Because of this, organizations active in safety and security, such as the Dutch Armed Forces and the Dutch National Police, need to be prepared for possible UAS accidents and attacks. To that end, it is vital that the nature of the possible threat that UAS may pose is detected in a timely manner. A method that can be employed for this problem is a Bayesian Belief Network (BBN). Given the observations made of a UAS and its surroundings, a BBN is capable to determine the most likely type of threat posed by the UAS. Generally, the probabilities that are required as input for this method can be estimated from historical data if enough data are available. However, since only a small amount of data about drone incidents has been collected, expert opinion is used. This introduces uncertainty in the BBN as opinions of experts are subjective. This paper presents a means to construct a BBN for UAS threat prediction when no empirical data are available and determine the robustness of the output. The analysis is restricted specifically to NATO Class I drones (less than 150 kg) in law enforcement operations.","PeriodicalId":223838,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15485129231206825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unmanned Aerial Systems (UASs), or drones, are becoming increasingly available to the general public. Because of this, organizations active in safety and security, such as the Dutch Armed Forces and the Dutch National Police, need to be prepared for possible UAS accidents and attacks. To that end, it is vital that the nature of the possible threat that UAS may pose is detected in a timely manner. A method that can be employed for this problem is a Bayesian Belief Network (BBN). Given the observations made of a UAS and its surroundings, a BBN is capable to determine the most likely type of threat posed by the UAS. Generally, the probabilities that are required as input for this method can be estimated from historical data if enough data are available. However, since only a small amount of data about drone incidents has been collected, expert opinion is used. This introduces uncertainty in the BBN as opinions of experts are subjective. This paper presents a means to construct a BBN for UAS threat prediction when no empirical data are available and determine the robustness of the output. The analysis is restricted specifically to NATO Class I drones (less than 150 kg) in law enforcement operations.
量化贝叶斯信念网络在无人机系统威胁预测中的鲁棒性
无人驾驶航空系统(UASs),或无人机,正越来越多地为公众所使用。正因为如此,荷兰武装部队和荷兰国家警察等活跃在安全和安保领域的组织需要为可能发生的无人机事故和袭击做好准备。为此,及时发现无人机可能构成的威胁的性质至关重要。贝叶斯信念网络(BBN)是解决这一问题的一种方法。根据对无人机及其周围环境的观察,BBN能够确定无人机最可能构成的威胁类型。通常,如果有足够的可用数据,则可以从历史数据中估计该方法所需的输入概率。然而,由于只收集了少量关于无人机事件的数据,因此使用了专家意见。这给BBN带来了不确定性,因为专家的意见是主观的。本文提出了一种在没有经验数据的情况下构建用于无人机威胁预测的BBN并确定输出鲁棒性的方法。该分析仅限于执法行动中的北约I级无人机(小于150公斤)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信