Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas: Predictive factors for incomplete resection

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Pierre-Olivier Jouppe , Nicolas Regenet , Ephrem Salame , Matthias Tallegas , Aymeric Amelot , Arthur David , Nicolas Michot
{"title":"Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas: Predictive factors for incomplete resection","authors":"Pierre-Olivier Jouppe ,&nbsp;Nicolas Regenet ,&nbsp;Ephrem Salame ,&nbsp;Matthias Tallegas ,&nbsp;Aymeric Amelot ,&nbsp;Arthur David ,&nbsp;Nicolas Michot","doi":"10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2023.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Curative management of retroperitoneal sarcoma<span><span> relies on surgery, and complete monoblock resection is one of the main prognostic factors. The goal of this study was to search </span>predictive factors for incomplete resection.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All patients undergoing surgery for retroperitoneal sarcoma in two University hospitals between 2010 and 202 were included. The main endpoint was incomplete resection (R1 ad R2) after surgery. Secondary analysis was performed where marginal R0 resection was considered as complete. Univariate and multivariable analysis of demographics, radiological, surgical and pathologic criteria were performed. Overall survival, local and distant recurrence were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Fifty-eight patients were included in the study. Fifty patients had incomplete resection, of which seven had marginal R0 resection. In multivariable analysis, none of the factors analyzed were associated with incomplete resection. In secondary analysis, undifferentiated liposarcoma histology (OR 12.3, 95% CI [1.416–107.303], </span><em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.023) was statistically significantly associated with incomplete resection. Low grade (grade I) histology was predictive of complete resection (OR 0.24, 95% CI [0.060–0.959], <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.043). Median follow-up duration was 27 months. Local and distant recurrence rates at three years were 37% and 22.4%, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this study, we highlighted several predictive factors for incomplete resection. These factors enable us to define target populations that could most benefit from complementary therapy along with surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Visceral Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Visceral Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878788623001650","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Curative management of retroperitoneal sarcoma relies on surgery, and complete monoblock resection is one of the main prognostic factors. The goal of this study was to search predictive factors for incomplete resection.

Methods

All patients undergoing surgery for retroperitoneal sarcoma in two University hospitals between 2010 and 202 were included. The main endpoint was incomplete resection (R1 ad R2) after surgery. Secondary analysis was performed where marginal R0 resection was considered as complete. Univariate and multivariable analysis of demographics, radiological, surgical and pathologic criteria were performed. Overall survival, local and distant recurrence were evaluated.

Results

Fifty-eight patients were included in the study. Fifty patients had incomplete resection, of which seven had marginal R0 resection. In multivariable analysis, none of the factors analyzed were associated with incomplete resection. In secondary analysis, undifferentiated liposarcoma histology (OR 12.3, 95% CI [1.416–107.303], P = 0.023) was statistically significantly associated with incomplete resection. Low grade (grade I) histology was predictive of complete resection (OR 0.24, 95% CI [0.060–0.959], P = 0.043). Median follow-up duration was 27 months. Local and distant recurrence rates at three years were 37% and 22.4%, respectively.

Conclusion

In this study, we highlighted several predictive factors for incomplete resection. These factors enable us to define target populations that could most benefit from complementary therapy along with surgery.

腹膜后软组织肉瘤:不完全切除的预测因素
导言腹膜后肉瘤的治愈主要依靠手术,而完整的单块切除是主要的预后因素之一。本研究旨在寻找不完全切除的预测因素。方法纳入 2010 年至 202 年间在两所大学医院接受腹膜后肉瘤手术的所有患者。主要终点是术后不完全切除(R1 和 R2)。二次分析将边缘R0切除视为完全切除。对人口统计学、放射学、手术和病理学标准进行了单变量和多变量分析。对总生存率、局部和远处复发进行了评估。研究共纳入了 58 例患者,其中 50 例患者切除不完全,7 例为边缘 R0 切除。在多变量分析中,所分析的因素均与不完全切除无关。在二次分析中,未分化脂肪肉瘤组织学(OR 12.3,95% CI [1.416-107.303],P = 0.023)与不完全切除有显著统计学相关性。低级别(I级)组织学可预测完全切除(OR 0.24,95% CI [0.060-0.959],P = 0.043)。中位随访时间为 27 个月。三年后的局部和远处复发率分别为 37% 和 22.4%。结论在这项研究中,我们强调了几种不完全切除的预测因素,这些因素使我们能够确定哪些目标人群最能从手术的辅助治疗中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Visceral Surgery (JVS) is the online-only, English version of the French Journal de Chirurgie Viscérale. The journal focuses on clinical research and continuing education, and publishes original and review articles related to general surgery, as well as press reviews of recently published major international works. High-quality illustrations of surgical techniques, images and videos serve as support for clinical evaluation and practice optimization. JVS is indexed in the main international databases (including Medline) and is accessible worldwide through ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信