Meeting Corporate Renewable Power Targets

IF 4.6 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Alessio Trivella, Danial Mohseni-Taheri, Selvaprabu Nadarajah
{"title":"Meeting Corporate Renewable Power Targets","authors":"Alessio Trivella, Danial Mohseni-Taheri, Selvaprabu Nadarajah","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2022.4354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several corporations have committed to procuring a percentage of their electricity demand from renewable sources by a future date. Long-term financial contracts with renewable generators based on a fixed strike price, known as virtual power purchase agreements (VPPAs), are popular to meet such a target. We formulate rolling power purchases using a portfolio of VPPAs as a Markov decision process, accounting for uncertainty in generator availability and in the prices of electricity, renewable energy certificates, and VPPAs. Obtaining an optimal procurement policy is intractable. We consider forecast-based reoptimization heuristics consistent with practice that limit the sourcing of different VPPA types and the timing of new agreements. We extend these heuristics and introduce an information-relaxation based reoptimization heuristic, both of which allow for full sourcing and timing flexibilities. The latter heuristic also accounts for future uncertainties when making a decision. We assess the value of decision flexibility in rolling power purchases to meet a renewable target by numerically comparing the aforementioned policies and variants thereof on realistic instances involving a novel strike price stochastic process calibrated to data. Policies with full timing flexibility and no sourcing flexibility reduce procurement costs significantly compared with one with neither type of flexibility. Introducing sourcing flexibility in the former policies results in further significant cost reduction, thus providing support for using VPPA portfolios that are both dynamic and heterogeneous. Computing near-optimal portfolios of this nature entails using our information-relaxation based reoptimization heuristic because portfolios constructed via forecast-based reoptimization exhibit higher suboptimality. This paper was accepted by Ilia Tsetlin, behavioral economics and decision analysis. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4354 .","PeriodicalId":49890,"journal":{"name":"Management Science","volume":"113 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4354","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Several corporations have committed to procuring a percentage of their electricity demand from renewable sources by a future date. Long-term financial contracts with renewable generators based on a fixed strike price, known as virtual power purchase agreements (VPPAs), are popular to meet such a target. We formulate rolling power purchases using a portfolio of VPPAs as a Markov decision process, accounting for uncertainty in generator availability and in the prices of electricity, renewable energy certificates, and VPPAs. Obtaining an optimal procurement policy is intractable. We consider forecast-based reoptimization heuristics consistent with practice that limit the sourcing of different VPPA types and the timing of new agreements. We extend these heuristics and introduce an information-relaxation based reoptimization heuristic, both of which allow for full sourcing and timing flexibilities. The latter heuristic also accounts for future uncertainties when making a decision. We assess the value of decision flexibility in rolling power purchases to meet a renewable target by numerically comparing the aforementioned policies and variants thereof on realistic instances involving a novel strike price stochastic process calibrated to data. Policies with full timing flexibility and no sourcing flexibility reduce procurement costs significantly compared with one with neither type of flexibility. Introducing sourcing flexibility in the former policies results in further significant cost reduction, thus providing support for using VPPA portfolios that are both dynamic and heterogeneous. Computing near-optimal portfolios of this nature entails using our information-relaxation based reoptimization heuristic because portfolios constructed via forecast-based reoptimization exhibit higher suboptimality. This paper was accepted by Ilia Tsetlin, behavioral economics and decision analysis. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4354 .
实现企业可再生能源目标
几家公司已经承诺在未来的某一天从可再生能源中获取一定比例的电力需求。为了实现这一目标,与可再生能源发电企业签订了基于固定执行价格的长期金融合同,即虚拟购电协议(VPPAs)。我们使用vppa组合作为马尔可夫决策过程来制定滚动电力购买,考虑发电机可用性和电价、可再生能源证书和vppa的不确定性。获得最优采购策略是棘手的。我们认为基于预测的再优化启发式与实践一致,限制了不同VPPA类型的采购和新协议的时间。我们扩展了这些启发式方法,并引入了基于信息松弛的再优化启发式方法,这两种方法都允许完全的采购和时间灵活性。后一种启发式在做决定时也考虑到了未来的不确定性。我们通过数值比较上述政策及其在涉及新的执行价格随机过程校准数据的现实实例中的变化,来评估滚动电力购买以满足可再生目标的决策灵活性的价值。与没有灵活性的政策相比,具有完全时间灵活性和没有采购灵活性的政策可以显著降低采购成本。在前一种策略中引入采购灵活性可以进一步显著降低成本,从而为使用动态和异构的VPPA投资组合提供支持。计算这种性质的近最优投资组合需要使用我们基于信息松弛的再优化启发式方法,因为通过基于预测的再优化构建的投资组合具有更高的次最优性。这篇论文被Ilia Tsetlin,行为经济学和决策分析所接受。补充材料:在线附录可在https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4354上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Management Science
Management Science 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
583
审稿时长
15 months
期刊介绍: Management Science is a scholarly journal that publishes scientific research on the theory and practice of management. The journal includes within its scope all aspects of management related to strategy, entrepreneurship, innovation, technology, and organizations as well as all functional areas of business, such as accounting, finance, information systems, marketing, and operations. The journal includes studies on organizational, managerial, group and individual decision making, from both normative and descriptive perspectives. The articles are primarily based on the foundational disciplines of computer science, economics, mathematics, psychology, sociology, and statistics, but cross-functional, multidisciplinary research that reflects the diversity of the management science professions is also encouraged. The journal interest extends to managerial issues in diverse organizational forms, such as for-profit and nonprofit firms, private and public sector institutions, and formal and informal networks of individuals. We welcome theoretical, experimental (field or lab) and empirical contributions. The unifying thread of all Management Science articles is an analytical focus on improving the understanding of management. An acceptable manuscript must be relevant to the theory or practice of management, must meet high standards of rigor, and must be of broad interest to the community of management science scholars.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信