El último fin y la naturaleza humana en Tomas de Aquino y Francisco Suárez

Oscar Edmundo Yangali Núñez
{"title":"El último fin y la naturaleza humana en Tomas de Aquino y Francisco Suárez","authors":"Oscar Edmundo Yangali Núñez","doi":"10.33539/phai.v22i2.3016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this paper is to demonstrate that the conceptions that Thomas Aquinas and Francisco Su´arez have about happiness and human nature share a common structure, despite some differences around their conception of essence. None of the mentioned authors should be identified under the labels of intellectualism or voluntarism since they defend the essential unity of the cognitive and affective dimensions in the human being. First, I develop why Aquinas’s position has been labeled intellectualist and how to challenge this label. Second, I examine what position Su´arez shows and what are his nuances on the Thomist conception. Finally, I show what conciliatory point we find between both conceptions in order to obtain a better definition of the ultimate goal and of the authentic nature of the human being.","PeriodicalId":474354,"journal":{"name":"Phainomenon","volume":"195 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phainomenon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33539/phai.v22i2.3016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to demonstrate that the conceptions that Thomas Aquinas and Francisco Su´arez have about happiness and human nature share a common structure, despite some differences around their conception of essence. None of the mentioned authors should be identified under the labels of intellectualism or voluntarism since they defend the essential unity of the cognitive and affective dimensions in the human being. First, I develop why Aquinas’s position has been labeled intellectualist and how to challenge this label. Second, I examine what position Su´arez shows and what are his nuances on the Thomist conception. Finally, I show what conciliatory point we find between both conceptions in order to obtain a better definition of the ultimate goal and of the authentic nature of the human being.
托马斯·德·阿基诺和弗朗西斯科·苏亚雷斯的终极目标和人性
本文的目的是证明托马斯·阿奎那和弗朗西斯科·苏亚雷斯关于幸福和人性的概念具有共同的结构,尽管他们的本质概念存在一些差异。上述作者都不应被贴上理智主义或唯意志论的标签,因为他们捍卫了人类认知维度和情感维度的本质统一。首先,我阐述了为什么阿奎那的立场被贴上了知识分子的标签,以及如何挑战这个标签。其次,我考察了苏亚雷斯的立场,以及他在托马斯主义概念上的细微差别。最后,我展示了我们在这两个概念之间找到的调和点,以便更好地定义终极目标和人的真实本质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信