Qualification of Child Status from Unregistered Polygamous Marriage without Marriage Validation (Study of Religious Court Decisions from 2019-2022)

Yuliani Tarais, Hartini Hartini
{"title":"Qualification of Child Status from Unregistered Polygamous Marriage without Marriage Validation (Study of Religious Court Decisions from 2019-2022)","authors":"Yuliani Tarais, Hartini Hartini","doi":"10.15294/pandecta.v18i1.45534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze the qualification of child status carried out by the Religious Court in cases of determining the origin of children in unregistered polygamous marriages that are not validated from 2019-2022. The second objective is to analyze the legal implications of the qualification of the child’s status. The research method used is normative juridical research, which is carried out by studying secondary data and conducting interviews. The collected data is analyzed qualitatively. The research results show that there are three qualifications of child status made by judges in the request for determining the origin of children from unregistered marriages without marriage validation, namely (1) determined as a legitimate child, (2) determined as a biological child, and (3) determined as a child of Applicant I (biological father) with Applicant II (Mother). The legal implications of this qualification are to provide different legal consequences for the rights of children, even if they originate from similar cases. The existence of different court rulings has an impact on the rights received by children from unregistered polygamous marriages that are not validated, on the one hand, it is seen as a form of legal discovery by judges, but on the other hand, it creates a disparity in decisions because it ignores the principle of similia similibus.","PeriodicalId":30516,"journal":{"name":"Pandecta Research Law Journal","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pandecta Research Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v18i1.45534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the qualification of child status carried out by the Religious Court in cases of determining the origin of children in unregistered polygamous marriages that are not validated from 2019-2022. The second objective is to analyze the legal implications of the qualification of the child’s status. The research method used is normative juridical research, which is carried out by studying secondary data and conducting interviews. The collected data is analyzed qualitatively. The research results show that there are three qualifications of child status made by judges in the request for determining the origin of children from unregistered marriages without marriage validation, namely (1) determined as a legitimate child, (2) determined as a biological child, and (3) determined as a child of Applicant I (biological father) with Applicant II (Mother). The legal implications of this qualification are to provide different legal consequences for the rights of children, even if they originate from similar cases. The existence of different court rulings has an impact on the rights received by children from unregistered polygamous marriages that are not validated, on the one hand, it is seen as a form of legal discovery by judges, but on the other hand, it creates a disparity in decisions because it ignores the principle of similia similibus.
未登记且婚姻无效的一夫多妻婚姻子女身份的资格(2019-2022年宗教法院判决研究)
本研究旨在分析宗教法院在2019-2022年未生效的未登记一夫多妻婚姻中确定子女来源的案件中进行的子女身份资格。第二个目标是分析儿童身份资格所涉法律问题。使用的研究方法是规范的法律研究,通过研究二手数据和进行访谈来进行。对收集到的数据进行定性分析。研究结果表明,法官在对未登记婚姻无效子女的出身认定请求中,对子女身份的认定有三种条件,即:(1)认定为合法子女;(2)认定为亲生子女;(3)认定为申请人本人(亲生父亲)与申请人本人(母亲)的子女。这一限定所涉法律问题是对儿童权利造成不同的法律后果,即使这些后果源于类似的案件。不同法院判决的存在,对未登记的、无效的一夫多妻婚姻的子女所享有的权利产生了影响,一方面被法官视为一种法律发现的形式,但另一方面,由于它忽视了类似的原则,造成了判决的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信