Analisis kesalahan Siswa SMP dalam Memecahkan Masalah Kontekstual pada Materi Perbandingan Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif

Mufidatin Anjelina, Ismail Ismail
{"title":"Analisis kesalahan Siswa SMP dalam Memecahkan Masalah Kontekstual pada Materi Perbandingan Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif","authors":"Mufidatin Anjelina, Ismail Ismail","doi":"10.26740/mathedunesa.v12n2.p652-662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this research is describe errors conducted by students of junior high schools with cognitive styles type field-dependent and field-independent in solving contextual problems in proportion and its causal factors. This research is a descriptive qualitative research. The research subjects for this research were 2 students with the most errors from each type of cognitive styles. The two subjects are of the same gender. Data was collected by interview techniques and test. This research used 3 kinds of instruments, those were interview guidelines, the GEFT test, and diagnostic tests. Data of this research is processed using Miles and Huberman technique which includes 3 steps. The results of this research shows the errors made by subject FD and FI cognitive style, and also the factors that cause the errors. Subject with FD cognitive style made errors such as, errors in understanding the problem, erros in devising a plan, erros in carrying out the plan, and looking back errors. The errors made by students with FI cognitive style included carrying out plans, and checking again. Factors that cause subject that has FD cognitive style made errors tend to be caused by difficulties in understanding problems, lack of the understanding of the mathematical concepts, and also lack of calculating skills. Factors that cause subject that has FI cognitive style made errors tend to result from a lack of thoroughness in students when solving problems.","PeriodicalId":31516,"journal":{"name":"MATHEdunesa","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MATHEdunesa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v12n2.p652-662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this research is describe errors conducted by students of junior high schools with cognitive styles type field-dependent and field-independent in solving contextual problems in proportion and its causal factors. This research is a descriptive qualitative research. The research subjects for this research were 2 students with the most errors from each type of cognitive styles. The two subjects are of the same gender. Data was collected by interview techniques and test. This research used 3 kinds of instruments, those were interview guidelines, the GEFT test, and diagnostic tests. Data of this research is processed using Miles and Huberman technique which includes 3 steps. The results of this research shows the errors made by subject FD and FI cognitive style, and also the factors that cause the errors. Subject with FD cognitive style made errors such as, errors in understanding the problem, erros in devising a plan, erros in carrying out the plan, and looking back errors. The errors made by students with FI cognitive style included carrying out plans, and checking again. Factors that cause subject that has FD cognitive style made errors tend to be caused by difficulties in understanding problems, lack of the understanding of the mathematical concepts, and also lack of calculating skills. Factors that cause subject that has FI cognitive style made errors tend to result from a lack of thoroughness in students when solving problems.
分析中学生在解决与认知风格相关的语境问题上的错误
本研究的目的是描述认知风格类型为场依赖型和场独立型的初中生在解决情境问题时所犯的比例错误及其成因。本研究为描述性质的研究。本研究的研究对象是两名在每种认知风格中错误最多的学生。这两个实验对象的性别相同。采用访谈法和测试法收集数据。本研究使用了访谈指南、GEFT测试和诊断测试三种工具。本研究的数据使用Miles和Huberman技术进行处理,其中包括3个步骤。本研究的结果显示了被试FD和FI的认知风格所产生的错误,以及导致这些错误的因素。具有FD认知风格的被试犯的错误主要有:理解问题的错误、制定计划的错误、执行计划的错误、回顾错误。FI型认知风格的学生犯的错误包括执行计划、再检查。导致具有FD认知风格的主体出现错误的因素往往是理解问题的困难,对数学概念的理解不足,以及计算能力的缺乏。导致具有FI认知风格的主体出现错误的因素往往是学生在解决问题时缺乏彻底性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信