Templates of expected measurement uncertainties

IF 0.9 Q3 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Denise Neudecker, A.M. Lewis, E.F. Matthews, J. Vanhoy, R.C. Haight, D.L. Smith, P. Talou, S. Croft, A.D. Carlson, B. Pierson, A. Wallner, Ali Al-Adili, Leslie Bernstein, R. Capote, Matthew J. Devlin, M. Drosg, D.L. Duke, S. Finch, M.W. Herman, K.J. Kelly, A. Koning, A.E. Lovell, Paola Marini, K. Montoya, G.P.A. Nobre, M. Paris, B. Pritychenko, H. Sjöstrand, L. Snyder, V. Sobes, A. Solders, Julien Taieb
{"title":"Templates of expected measurement uncertainties","authors":"Denise Neudecker, A.M. Lewis, E.F. Matthews, J. Vanhoy, R.C. Haight, D.L. Smith, P. Talou, S. Croft, A.D. Carlson, B. Pierson, A. Wallner, Ali Al-Adili, Leslie Bernstein, R. Capote, Matthew J. Devlin, M. Drosg, D.L. Duke, S. Finch, M.W. Herman, K.J. Kelly, A. Koning, A.E. Lovell, Paola Marini, K. Montoya, G.P.A. Nobre, M. Paris, B. Pritychenko, H. Sjöstrand, L. Snyder, V. Sobes, A. Solders, Julien Taieb","doi":"10.1051/epjn/2023014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The covariance committee of CSEWG (Cross Section Evaluation Working Group) established templates of expected measurement uncertainties for neutron-induced total, (n, γ ), neutron-induced charged-particle, and (n,xn) reaction cross sections as well as prompt fission neutron spectra, average prompt and total fission neutron multiplicities, and fission yields. Templates provide a list of what uncertainty sources are expected for each measurement type and observable, and suggest typical ranges of these uncertainties and correlations based on a survey of experimental data, associated literature, and feedback from experimenters. Information needed to faithfully include the experimental data in the nuclear-data evaluation process is also provided. These templates could assist (a) experimenters and EXFOR compilers in delivering more complete uncertainties and measurement information relevant for evaluations of new experimental data, and (b) evaluators in achieving a more comprehensive uncertainty quantification for evaluation purposes. This effort might ultimately lead to more realistic evaluated covariances for nuclear-data applications. In this topical issue, we cover the templates coming out of this CSEWG effort–typically, one observable per paper. This paper here prefaces this topical issue by introducing the concept and mathematical framework of templates, discussing potential use cases, and giving an example of how they can be applied (estimating missing experimental uncertainties of 235 U(n,f) average prompt fission neutron multiplicities), and their impact on nuclear-data evaluations.","PeriodicalId":44454,"journal":{"name":"EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2023014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The covariance committee of CSEWG (Cross Section Evaluation Working Group) established templates of expected measurement uncertainties for neutron-induced total, (n, γ ), neutron-induced charged-particle, and (n,xn) reaction cross sections as well as prompt fission neutron spectra, average prompt and total fission neutron multiplicities, and fission yields. Templates provide a list of what uncertainty sources are expected for each measurement type and observable, and suggest typical ranges of these uncertainties and correlations based on a survey of experimental data, associated literature, and feedback from experimenters. Information needed to faithfully include the experimental data in the nuclear-data evaluation process is also provided. These templates could assist (a) experimenters and EXFOR compilers in delivering more complete uncertainties and measurement information relevant for evaluations of new experimental data, and (b) evaluators in achieving a more comprehensive uncertainty quantification for evaluation purposes. This effort might ultimately lead to more realistic evaluated covariances for nuclear-data applications. In this topical issue, we cover the templates coming out of this CSEWG effort–typically, one observable per paper. This paper here prefaces this topical issue by introducing the concept and mathematical framework of templates, discussing potential use cases, and giving an example of how they can be applied (estimating missing experimental uncertainties of 235 U(n,f) average prompt fission neutron multiplicities), and their impact on nuclear-data evaluations.
预期测量不确定度模板
CSEWG(截面评估工作组)协方差委员会建立了中子诱导总、(n, γ)、中子诱导带电粒子和(n,xn)反应截面的预期测量不确定度模板,以及提示裂变中子谱、平均提示和总裂变中子多重度和裂变产额。模板提供了每种测量类型和可观测值的不确定性源的列表,并根据对实验数据、相关文献和实验者反馈的调查建议了这些不确定性和相关性的典型范围。还提供了在核数据评价过程中忠实地包括实验数据所需的资料。这些模板可以帮助实验者和EXFOR编译者提供与新实验数据评估相关的更完整的不确定度和测量信息,以及(b)评估者为评估目的实现更全面的不确定度量化。这一努力可能最终为核数据应用带来更现实的协方差评估。在本期专题中,我们将介绍CSEWG工作产生的模板—通常每篇论文一个可观察对象。本文介绍了模板的概念和数学框架,讨论了潜在的用例,并给出了一个如何应用模板的例子(估计235 U(n,f)平均裂变中子增殖率的缺失实验不确定性),以及它们对核数据评估的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies
EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信