Consensus on telepractice service delivery practices with vulnerable families: a Delphi study

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Victoria Hamilton, Zvezdana Petrovic, Fiona Stephanie May, Catherine Wade
{"title":"Consensus on telepractice service delivery practices with vulnerable families: a Delphi study","authors":"Victoria Hamilton, Zvezdana Petrovic, Fiona Stephanie May, Catherine Wade","doi":"10.1080/18387357.2023.2267148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTObjective: In recent years family services have been required to rapidly employ telehealth without access to a reliable and contemporary evidence-base for implementation. This study explores expert views on systems and practices that facilitate telehealth in the delivery of family support services to vulnerable families.Method: Using the Delphi survey method, an inventory comprising 124 telepractices was presented to an initial panel of telepractice researchers and practitioners (N = 23) for ratings across three survey rounds. The panel was asked to provide feedback and suggestions for further inclusions, leading to an additional 29 items.Results: Results indicate 119 telepractice strategies were endorsed as essential and/or feasible for family services. These strategies were spread across five domains including practices prior to service delivery, practices during telepractice, practices when working with group programs, practices when working with culturally and linguistically diverse communities, and support for practitioners.Discussion: Practices that facilitate organisational support for practitioners, flexible service modality, and equitable access and privacy attracted the strongest endorsement. The findings support a hybrid model of service delivery in family services.KEYWORDS: Telepracticetelehealthfamily servicesvulnerable familiesparenting supportservice providersDelphi study Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis research project was funded by the Victorian Government Department of Families, Fairness and Housing.","PeriodicalId":51720,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mental Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18387357.2023.2267148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjective: In recent years family services have been required to rapidly employ telehealth without access to a reliable and contemporary evidence-base for implementation. This study explores expert views on systems and practices that facilitate telehealth in the delivery of family support services to vulnerable families.Method: Using the Delphi survey method, an inventory comprising 124 telepractices was presented to an initial panel of telepractice researchers and practitioners (N = 23) for ratings across three survey rounds. The panel was asked to provide feedback and suggestions for further inclusions, leading to an additional 29 items.Results: Results indicate 119 telepractice strategies were endorsed as essential and/or feasible for family services. These strategies were spread across five domains including practices prior to service delivery, practices during telepractice, practices when working with group programs, practices when working with culturally and linguistically diverse communities, and support for practitioners.Discussion: Practices that facilitate organisational support for practitioners, flexible service modality, and equitable access and privacy attracted the strongest endorsement. The findings support a hybrid model of service delivery in family services.KEYWORDS: Telepracticetelehealthfamily servicesvulnerable familiesparenting supportservice providersDelphi study Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis research project was funded by the Victorian Government Department of Families, Fairness and Housing.
弱势家庭远程医疗服务交付实践的共识:德尔菲研究
摘要:目的:近年来,在缺乏可靠的现代证据基础的情况下,家庭服务被要求迅速采用远程医疗。本研究探讨了专家对促进远程医疗向弱势家庭提供家庭支持服务的系统和做法的看法。方法:使用德尔菲调查法,将包含124个远程诊所的清单提交给远程诊所研究人员和从业者的初始小组(N = 23),以便在三轮调查中进行评级。专家组被要求就进一步列入项目提供反馈和建议,从而增加了29个项目。结果:结果表明119远程诊疗策略被认可为必不可少和/或可行的家庭服务。这些策略分布在五个领域,包括服务交付前的实践、远程实践期间的实践、与小组项目合作时的实践、与文化和语言多样化的社区合作时的实践,以及对从业者的支持。讨论:促进组织对从业人员的支持、灵活的服务方式以及公平获取和隐私的做法获得了最强烈的认可。研究结果支持家庭服务提供的混合模式。关键词:远程医疗、远程医疗、家庭服务、弱势家庭、育儿支持、服务提供者德尔菲研究披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本研究项目由维多利亚州政府家庭、公平和住房部资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信