{"title":"Bank competition and liquidity hoarding","authors":"Japan Huynh","doi":"10.1007/s40822-023-00240-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the in-depth effect of bank competition on liquidity hoarding by using a comprehensive strategy for empirical measurement. More precisely, we include all asset-, liability-, and off-balance-sheet items when generating our measures of bank liquidity hoarding. For a multiple-aspect assessment of banking market structure, we simultaneously employ non-structural proxies (Lerner index, Boone indicator, and H-statistic index) and structural measures (top-bank market concentration ratio and Herfindahl–Hirschman index). Through bank-level financial data from 30 Vietnamese banks during 2007–2021, we find strong and consistent evidence that higher bank competition increases total liquidity hoarding. Disaggregate analysis reveals that the increased accumulation in total liquidity hoarding is driven by asset and liability items on the balance sheet, though our findings indicate that bank competition reduces liquidity hoarding off balance sheets. We further shed light on how the impact of competition on liquidity hoarding depends on bank-level heterogeneity. The results suggest that the link is less pronounced for banks that are larger in size, hold more equity capital, and yield better profitability. Our set of results consistently supports the view that financially healthier banks are more effective in handling competitive pressures in the banking market, and thus they may have a better position to mitigate the liquidity hoarding effect from bank competition. Multiple robustness checks are employed to lend further strength to our conclusions.","PeriodicalId":45064,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Economic Review","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-023-00240-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper explores the in-depth effect of bank competition on liquidity hoarding by using a comprehensive strategy for empirical measurement. More precisely, we include all asset-, liability-, and off-balance-sheet items when generating our measures of bank liquidity hoarding. For a multiple-aspect assessment of banking market structure, we simultaneously employ non-structural proxies (Lerner index, Boone indicator, and H-statistic index) and structural measures (top-bank market concentration ratio and Herfindahl–Hirschman index). Through bank-level financial data from 30 Vietnamese banks during 2007–2021, we find strong and consistent evidence that higher bank competition increases total liquidity hoarding. Disaggregate analysis reveals that the increased accumulation in total liquidity hoarding is driven by asset and liability items on the balance sheet, though our findings indicate that bank competition reduces liquidity hoarding off balance sheets. We further shed light on how the impact of competition on liquidity hoarding depends on bank-level heterogeneity. The results suggest that the link is less pronounced for banks that are larger in size, hold more equity capital, and yield better profitability. Our set of results consistently supports the view that financially healthier banks are more effective in handling competitive pressures in the banking market, and thus they may have a better position to mitigate the liquidity hoarding effect from bank competition. Multiple robustness checks are employed to lend further strength to our conclusions.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Eurasian Economic Review is to publish peer-reviewed empirical research papers that test, extend, or build theory and contribute to practice. All empirical methods - including, but not limited to, qualitative, quantitative, field, laboratory, and any combination of methods - are welcome. Empirical, theoretical and methodological articles from all fields of finance and applied macroeconomics are featured in the journal. Theoretical and/or review articles that integrate existing bodies of research and that provide new insights into the field are highly encouraged. The journal has a broad scope, addressing such issues as: financial systems and regulation, corporate and start-up finance, macro and sustainable finance, finance and innovation, consumer finance, public policies on financial markets within local, regional, national and international contexts, money and banking, and the interface of labor and financial economics. The macroeconomics coverage includes topics from monetary economics, labor economics, international economics and development economics.
Eurasian Economic Review is published quarterly. To be published in Eurasian Economic Review, a manuscript must make strong empirical and/or theoretical contributions and highlight the significance of those contributions to our field. Consequently, preference is given to submissions that test, extend, or build strong theoretical frameworks while empirically examining issues with high importance for theory and practice. Eurasian Economic Review is not tied to any national context. Although it focuses on Europe and Asia, all papers from related fields on any region or country are highly encouraged. Single country studies, cross-country or regional studies can be submitted.