Reading relationally: a proposal for relational-comparative research concerning city/capital of culture events

IF 0.7 Q4 BUSINESS
Barbara Grabher
{"title":"Reading relationally: a proposal for relational-comparative research concerning city/capital of culture events","authors":"Barbara Grabher","doi":"10.1108/aam-08-2021-0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose García and Cox (2013) have clarified that there is an urgent need for comparative studies of city/capital of culture (COC) events. With the ambition to foster exchange and learning, knowledge production concerning cultural initiatives requires to think beyond the individual case study of a singular event. Simultaneously, the two scholars observe comparability and context-sensitivity between events as a major issue in these particular canons of research. Design/methodology/approach Drawing upon the research experience of the project, this article experiments with a novel reading of city/capital of culture events. Findings Beyond the singularity of a case study but with attention to context-sensitivities, the article proposes a relational reading practice to study the culture-led event framework. The author illustrates the proposed approach with material collected in ethnographic fieldwork in the cities of Donostia/San Sebastián, European COC 2016, and Hull, UK COC 2017. Originality/value By using one case study as a metaphorical pair of glasses framing the investigative perspective on the other, an analytical relationship between two COC events is established, fostering a broader prism of analysis and connected learning.","PeriodicalId":42080,"journal":{"name":"Arts and the Market","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts and the Market","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/aam-08-2021-0037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose García and Cox (2013) have clarified that there is an urgent need for comparative studies of city/capital of culture (COC) events. With the ambition to foster exchange and learning, knowledge production concerning cultural initiatives requires to think beyond the individual case study of a singular event. Simultaneously, the two scholars observe comparability and context-sensitivity between events as a major issue in these particular canons of research. Design/methodology/approach Drawing upon the research experience of the project, this article experiments with a novel reading of city/capital of culture events. Findings Beyond the singularity of a case study but with attention to context-sensitivities, the article proposes a relational reading practice to study the culture-led event framework. The author illustrates the proposed approach with material collected in ethnographic fieldwork in the cities of Donostia/San Sebastián, European COC 2016, and Hull, UK COC 2017. Originality/value By using one case study as a metaphorical pair of glasses framing the investigative perspective on the other, an analytical relationship between two COC events is established, fostering a broader prism of analysis and connected learning.
关系阅读:城市/文化事件之都关系比较研究建议
目的García和Cox(2013)已经阐明了迫切需要对城市/文化之都(COC)事件进行比较研究。为了促进交流和学习,有关文化活动的知识生产需要超越单一事件的个别案例研究。同时,两位学者观察到事件之间的可比性和上下文敏感性是这些特定研究经典中的一个主要问题。根据项目的研究经验,本文尝试对城市/文化事件之都进行一种新颖的解读。除了个案研究的独特性之外,本文还提出了一个关系阅读实践来研究文化主导的事件框架。作者通过在Donostia/San Sebastián(2016年欧洲COC)和Hull(2017年英国COC)等城市的民族志田野调查中收集的材料说明了所提出的方法。独创性/价值通过将一个案例研究作为一副隐喻性的眼镜,为另一个案例的调查视角提供框架,建立了两个COC事件之间的分析关系,培养了更广泛的分析棱镜和相互关联的学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
28.60%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信