Comprehensive Analysis of the Financial Performance of Indian Public Sector Banks

{"title":"Comprehensive Analysis of the Financial Performance of Indian Public Sector Banks","authors":"","doi":"10.46632/tfe/1/3/5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, the government consolidated numerous public sector banks. The basis for conducting this study is this. This article's goal is to pinpoint the variables that influence public sector bank performance in India as well as the connections between those variables and the performance of particular banks operated by the government. In this article, we will examine the financial information from all public sector commercial banks over an 11-year period (from 2009 to 2019). Both the system generalised method of moments (GMM) analysis and the canonical correlation analysis (CCA) have been used to analyse the effects of determinants on public sector bank performance assessment.. CAMEL, which stands for Capital Adequacy, Assets Quality, Management Efficiency, Earning, and Liquidity, has been used to assess performance. Several public sector banks have lately been consolidated by the government. The basis for conducting this study is this. This article's goal is to identify the variables that determine Indian public sector banks' performance as well as the connections between those variables and performance. In this study, we will examine the financial data from all public sector commercial banks over an 11-year period (from 2009 to 2019). Both the system generalised method of moments (GMM) analysis and canonical correlation analysis (CCA) have been employed to assess the influence of determinants on the performance measurement of public sector banks Performance has been assessed using the CAMEL framework, which stands for Capital Adequacy, Assets Quality, Management Efficiency, Earnings, and Liquidity. This framework is widely used to evaluate the financial system in India. For a number of reasons, the financial health of public sector banks (PSBs) is crucial.First and foremost, PSBs are essential in delivering financial services to the general population, particularly in rural and semi-urban areas where private banks might not be present. Therefore, the availability of financial services to a wide portion of the public has a direct impact on their financial health.Second, PSBs frequently serve as the primary lenders to important economic sectors like infrastructure, SMEs, and agriculture. As a result, their financial performance may have a big impact on how these industries grow and develop. Thirdly, PSBs frequently have government ownership and are subject to public scrutiny. As a result, one key indicator of their efficiency is their financial performance. Alternate Parameters taken as SBI, BOB, PNB, BOI, CANARA. Evaluation Parameter taken as The following financial performance indicators have been considered: net profit margin%, return on assets%, return on net worth%, interest income to total assets%, interest expenses to total assets%, and operating expenses to total. In August 2015, a target was set for PSBs to raise $110,000 crore from the markets by the years 2018-19. However, compared to this target, only Rs. 7,726 crore was raised between January 2015 and March 2017. Given the CCEA's assurance to prevent an excessive influx of banking equity issues in the market simultaneously, it appears impossible to achieve this goal by March 2019.DFS decided that additional capital injections will only be granted if specific PSBs met the performance standards stated in the MoUs with those PSBs (signed in February/March 2012). However, in practice, this was not done. According to Audit Report No. 28 of 2017 55, the MoU targets for some metrics decreased year over year while no specific targets were specified for others.","PeriodicalId":498004,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Finance and Economics","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Finance and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46632/tfe/1/3/5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, the government consolidated numerous public sector banks. The basis for conducting this study is this. This article's goal is to pinpoint the variables that influence public sector bank performance in India as well as the connections between those variables and the performance of particular banks operated by the government. In this article, we will examine the financial information from all public sector commercial banks over an 11-year period (from 2009 to 2019). Both the system generalised method of moments (GMM) analysis and the canonical correlation analysis (CCA) have been used to analyse the effects of determinants on public sector bank performance assessment.. CAMEL, which stands for Capital Adequacy, Assets Quality, Management Efficiency, Earning, and Liquidity, has been used to assess performance. Several public sector banks have lately been consolidated by the government. The basis for conducting this study is this. This article's goal is to identify the variables that determine Indian public sector banks' performance as well as the connections between those variables and performance. In this study, we will examine the financial data from all public sector commercial banks over an 11-year period (from 2009 to 2019). Both the system generalised method of moments (GMM) analysis and canonical correlation analysis (CCA) have been employed to assess the influence of determinants on the performance measurement of public sector banks Performance has been assessed using the CAMEL framework, which stands for Capital Adequacy, Assets Quality, Management Efficiency, Earnings, and Liquidity. This framework is widely used to evaluate the financial system in India. For a number of reasons, the financial health of public sector banks (PSBs) is crucial.First and foremost, PSBs are essential in delivering financial services to the general population, particularly in rural and semi-urban areas where private banks might not be present. Therefore, the availability of financial services to a wide portion of the public has a direct impact on their financial health.Second, PSBs frequently serve as the primary lenders to important economic sectors like infrastructure, SMEs, and agriculture. As a result, their financial performance may have a big impact on how these industries grow and develop. Thirdly, PSBs frequently have government ownership and are subject to public scrutiny. As a result, one key indicator of their efficiency is their financial performance. Alternate Parameters taken as SBI, BOB, PNB, BOI, CANARA. Evaluation Parameter taken as The following financial performance indicators have been considered: net profit margin%, return on assets%, return on net worth%, interest income to total assets%, interest expenses to total assets%, and operating expenses to total. In August 2015, a target was set for PSBs to raise $110,000 crore from the markets by the years 2018-19. However, compared to this target, only Rs. 7,726 crore was raised between January 2015 and March 2017. Given the CCEA's assurance to prevent an excessive influx of banking equity issues in the market simultaneously, it appears impossible to achieve this goal by March 2019.DFS decided that additional capital injections will only be granted if specific PSBs met the performance standards stated in the MoUs with those PSBs (signed in February/March 2012). However, in practice, this was not done. According to Audit Report No. 28 of 2017 55, the MoU targets for some metrics decreased year over year while no specific targets were specified for others.
印度公共部门银行财务绩效综合分析
最近,政府合并了许多公共部门银行。进行这项研究的基础是这样的。本文的目标是找出影响印度公共部门银行绩效的变量,以及这些变量与政府运营的特定银行绩效之间的联系。在本文中,我们将研究所有公共部门商业银行在11年期间(2009年至2019年)的财务信息。系统广义矩法(GMM)分析和典型相关分析(CCA)都被用来分析决定因素对公共部门银行绩效评估的影响。CAMEL代表资本充足率,资产质量,管理效率,收益和流动性,已被用于评估绩效。几家公共部门银行最近已被政府合并。进行这项研究的基础是这样的。本文的目标是确定决定印度公共部门银行绩效的变量,以及这些变量与绩效之间的联系。在本研究中,我们将研究所有公共部门商业银行在11年期间(2009年至2019年)的财务数据。系统广义矩法(GMM)分析和典型相关分析(CCA)都被用来评估决定因素对公共部门银行绩效衡量的影响。绩效评估使用CAMEL框架,它代表资本充足率、资产质量、管理效率、收益和流动性。这一框架被广泛用于评估印度的金融体系。出于多种原因,公共部门银行(psb)的财务健康至关重要。首先,邮政储蓄银行在向普通民众提供金融服务方面至关重要,特别是在私人银行可能不存在的农村和半城市地区。因此,向广大公众提供金融服务对他们的财务健康有直接影响。其次,邮储银行经常是基础设施、中小企业和农业等重要经济部门的主要贷款人。因此,它们的财务表现可能会对这些行业的成长和发展产生重大影响。第三,公共服务银行通常为政府所有,并接受公众监督。因此,衡量它们效率的一个关键指标是它们的财务表现。备选参数为SBI, BOB, PNB, BOI, CANARA。考虑以下财务绩效指标:净利润率%,资产收益率%,净资产收益率%,利息收入占总资产%,利息费用占总资产%,营业费用占总资产%。2015年8月,邮政储蓄银行设定了到2018-19年从市场筹集11万亿美元的目标。然而,与这一目标相比,2015年1月至2017年3月期间仅筹集了772.6亿卢比。鉴于CCEA保证防止银行股权发行同时过度涌入市场,似乎不可能在2019年3月之前实现这一目标。金融服务局决定,只有在特定储蓄银行达到与这些储蓄银行签署的谅解备忘录(于2012年2月/ 3月签署)所规定的表现标准时,才会给予额外注资。然而,实际上并没有这样做。根据2017年第28号审计报告55,谅解备忘录的一些指标的目标逐年下降,而没有为其他指标指定具体目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信