Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Evidence-Based Practice Attitudes Scale in Audiologists

Audiology Pub Date : 2023-09-10 DOI:10.18502/avr.v32i4.13596
Soheila Shayanmehr, Maryam Sadeghijam, Shohreh Jalaie, Akram Pourbakht, Farnoush Jarollahi, Alimohamad Asghari, Maryam Karimi Boroujeni
{"title":"Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Evidence-Based Practice Attitudes Scale in Audiologists","authors":"Soheila Shayanmehr, Maryam Sadeghijam, Shohreh Jalaie, Akram Pourbakht, Farnoush Jarollahi, Alimohamad Asghari, Maryam Karimi Boroujeni","doi":"10.18502/avr.v32i4.13596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: Evidence-based practice improves the quality of clinical performance. Attitude affects the implementation of research findings into practice. The Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS-36) evaluates the attitude of therapists toward evidence-based practice. The present study aimed to provide a validated Persian translation of the EBPAS-36 for audiologists.&#x0D; Methods: The original EBPAS-36 was translated by using the international quality of life assessment protocol. The validity of translated version was surveyed by an expert panel and the Persian version with 35 questions was yielded. A demographic questionnaire and EBPAS P-35 were given to 182 audiologists to evaluate the psychometric properties. The reliability was evaluated by completing the EBPAS P-35 after 2 weeks by 30 of the participants and Cronbach’s alpha and Intra-Class Correlation (ICC) were calculated. Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFA) were also conducted.&#x0D; Results: The content validity ratio was above 0.33 for all except item 10 which was removed from the Persian version. The mean(SD) total score was 2.38(0.46). A significant relationship was observed between the total score and all subscales (p<0.05). The original factor structure showed an acceptable model fit (CMIN/DF=1.39, GFI=0.84, CFI=0.94, IFI=0.94, RMSEA=0.04) confirming the 12-factor structure of the EBPAS-36. The internal consistency was very good for the total score (α=0.88) and adequate to very good for the subscales (0.65–0.84), indicating high reliability. The ICC showed good agreement in the score of test-retest (total ICC=0.65).&#x0D; Conclusion: This study confirms good psychometric properties and validity of the EBPAS P-35 in a sample of audiologists.&#x0D; Keywords: Evidence-based practice; research-based intervention; clinical implementation; attitude; audiologist","PeriodicalId":30299,"journal":{"name":"Audiology","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/avr.v32i4.13596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aim: Evidence-based practice improves the quality of clinical performance. Attitude affects the implementation of research findings into practice. The Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS-36) evaluates the attitude of therapists toward evidence-based practice. The present study aimed to provide a validated Persian translation of the EBPAS-36 for audiologists. Methods: The original EBPAS-36 was translated by using the international quality of life assessment protocol. The validity of translated version was surveyed by an expert panel and the Persian version with 35 questions was yielded. A demographic questionnaire and EBPAS P-35 were given to 182 audiologists to evaluate the psychometric properties. The reliability was evaluated by completing the EBPAS P-35 after 2 weeks by 30 of the participants and Cronbach’s alpha and Intra-Class Correlation (ICC) were calculated. Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFA) were also conducted. Results: The content validity ratio was above 0.33 for all except item 10 which was removed from the Persian version. The mean(SD) total score was 2.38(0.46). A significant relationship was observed between the total score and all subscales (p<0.05). The original factor structure showed an acceptable model fit (CMIN/DF=1.39, GFI=0.84, CFI=0.94, IFI=0.94, RMSEA=0.04) confirming the 12-factor structure of the EBPAS-36. The internal consistency was very good for the total score (α=0.88) and adequate to very good for the subscales (0.65–0.84), indicating high reliability. The ICC showed good agreement in the score of test-retest (total ICC=0.65). Conclusion: This study confirms good psychometric properties and validity of the EBPAS P-35 in a sample of audiologists. Keywords: Evidence-based practice; research-based intervention; clinical implementation; attitude; audiologist
听力学家波斯语循证实践态度量表的文化适应和心理测量特征
背景与目的:循证实践提高了临床表现的质量。态度影响着研究成果在实践中的实施。循证实践态度量表(EBPAS-36)评估治疗师对循证实践的态度。本研究旨在为听力学家提供EBPAS-36的有效波斯语翻译。方法:采用国际生活质量评估方案翻译原EBPAS-36。由专家小组对译文的有效性进行了调查,并产生了包含35个问题的波斯语版本。对182名听力学家进行了人口统计问卷和EBPAS P-35评估。通过30名参与者在2周后完成EBPAS P-35来评估信度,并计算Cronbach 's alpha和Intra-Class Correlation (ICC)。还进行了验证性因素分析(CFA)。 结果:除第10项外,其余内容效度均在0.33以上。平均(SD)总分为2.38分(0.46分)。总分与各分量表之间存在显著相关(p < 0.05)。原始因子结构的模型拟合较好(CMIN/DF=1.39, GFI=0.84, CFI=0.94, IFI=0.94, RMSEA=0.04),证实了EBPAS-36的12因子结构。总体评分的内部一致性为非常好(α=0.88),各分量表的内部一致性为足够至非常好(α= 0.65 ~ 0.84),信度较高。ICC在复试得分上表现出良好的一致性(总ICC=0.65)。 结论:本研究在听力学家样本中证实了EBPAS P-35良好的心理测量特性和有效性。关键词:循证实践;基于研究的干预;临床实施;态度;听力学家
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信