Improving Bert Model Accuracy for Uni-modal Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis Task

Pub Date : 2023-09-10 DOI:10.12694/scpe.v24i3.2444
Amit Chauhan, Rajni Mohana
{"title":"Improving Bert Model Accuracy for Uni-modal Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis Task","authors":"Amit Chauhan, Rajni Mohana","doi":"10.12694/scpe.v24i3.2444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Techniques and methods for examining users’ feelings, emotions, and views in text or other media are known as ”sentiment analysis,” this phrase is used frequently. In many areas, including marketing and online social media, analysis of user and consumer opinions has always been essential to decision-making processes. The development of new methodologies that concentrate on analysing the sentiment associated with specific product characteristics, such as aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA), was prompted by the need for a deeper understanding of these opinions. Despite the growing interest in this field, some misunderstanding exists about ABSA’s core ideas. Even though sentiment, affect, emotion, and opinion refer to various ideas, they are frequently used synonymously. This ambiguity commonly causes user opinions to be analysed incorrectly. This work provides an overview of ABSA and the issue of overfitting. Following this analysis, we improved the model by enhancing the accuracy and F1 score of the existing model by fine-tuning the technique. Our model outperformed the others, achieving the best results for the restaurant dataset with an 85.02 accuracy and a 79.19 F1 score, respectively.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12694/scpe.v24i3.2444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Techniques and methods for examining users’ feelings, emotions, and views in text or other media are known as ”sentiment analysis,” this phrase is used frequently. In many areas, including marketing and online social media, analysis of user and consumer opinions has always been essential to decision-making processes. The development of new methodologies that concentrate on analysing the sentiment associated with specific product characteristics, such as aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA), was prompted by the need for a deeper understanding of these opinions. Despite the growing interest in this field, some misunderstanding exists about ABSA’s core ideas. Even though sentiment, affect, emotion, and opinion refer to various ideas, they are frequently used synonymously. This ambiguity commonly causes user opinions to be analysed incorrectly. This work provides an overview of ABSA and the issue of overfitting. Following this analysis, we improved the model by enhancing the accuracy and F1 score of the existing model by fine-tuning the technique. Our model outperformed the others, achieving the best results for the restaurant dataset with an 85.02 accuracy and a 79.19 F1 score, respectively.
分享
查看原文
提高Bert模型在单模态基于方面的情感分析任务中的准确性
检查用户在文本或其他媒体中的感受、情绪和观点的技术和方法被称为“情感分析”,这个短语经常被使用。在许多领域,包括市场营销和在线社交媒体,对用户和消费者意见的分析一直是决策过程的关键。由于需要更深入地理解这些观点,因此开发了新的方法,专注于分析与特定产品特征相关的情感,例如基于方面的情感分析(ABSA)。尽管人们对这一领域的兴趣日益浓厚,但对ABSA的核心理念仍存在一些误解。尽管sentiment、affect、emotion和opinion指的是不同的想法,但它们经常被用作同义词。这种模糊性通常会导致用户意见被错误地分析。这项工作提供了ABSA和过拟合问题的概述。在此基础上,我们对模型进行了改进,通过微调技术提高了现有模型的精度和F1分数。我们的模型表现优于其他模型,在餐馆数据集上取得了最好的结果,准确率分别为85.02,F1得分为79.19。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信