Social media and social impact assessment: Evolving methods in a shifting context

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Kate Sherren, Yan Chen, Mehrnoosh Mohammadi, Qiqi Zhao, Keshava Pallavi Gone, HM Tuihedur Rahman, Michael Smit
{"title":"Social media and social impact assessment: Evolving methods in a shifting context","authors":"Kate Sherren, Yan Chen, Mehrnoosh Mohammadi, Qiqi Zhao, Keshava Pallavi Gone, HM Tuihedur Rahman, Michael Smit","doi":"10.1177/00113921231203179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among many by-products of Web 2.0 come the wide range of potential image and text datasets within social media and content sharing platforms that speak of how people live, what they do, and what they care about. These datasets are imperfect and biased in many ways, but those flaws make them complementary to data derived from conventional social science methods and thus potentially useful for triangulation in complex decision-making contexts. Yet the online environment is highly mutable, and so the datasets are less reliable than censuses or other standard data types leveraged in social impact assessment. Over the past decade, we have innovated numerous methods for deploying Instagram datasets in investigating management or development alternatives. This article synthesizes work from three Canadian decision contexts – hydroelectric dam construction or removal; dyke realignment or wetland restoration; and integrating renewable energy into vineyard landscapes – to illustrate some of the methods we have applied to social impact assessment questions using Instagram that may be transferrable to other social media platforms and contexts: thematic (manual coding, machine vision, natural language processing/sentiment analysis, statistical analysis), spatial (hotspot mapping, cultural ecosystem modeling), and visual (word clouds, saliency mapping, collage). We conclude with a set of cautions and next steps for the domain.","PeriodicalId":47938,"journal":{"name":"Current Sociology","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921231203179","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Among many by-products of Web 2.0 come the wide range of potential image and text datasets within social media and content sharing platforms that speak of how people live, what they do, and what they care about. These datasets are imperfect and biased in many ways, but those flaws make them complementary to data derived from conventional social science methods and thus potentially useful for triangulation in complex decision-making contexts. Yet the online environment is highly mutable, and so the datasets are less reliable than censuses or other standard data types leveraged in social impact assessment. Over the past decade, we have innovated numerous methods for deploying Instagram datasets in investigating management or development alternatives. This article synthesizes work from three Canadian decision contexts – hydroelectric dam construction or removal; dyke realignment or wetland restoration; and integrating renewable energy into vineyard landscapes – to illustrate some of the methods we have applied to social impact assessment questions using Instagram that may be transferrable to other social media platforms and contexts: thematic (manual coding, machine vision, natural language processing/sentiment analysis, statistical analysis), spatial (hotspot mapping, cultural ecosystem modeling), and visual (word clouds, saliency mapping, collage). We conclude with a set of cautions and next steps for the domain.
社会媒体和社会影响评估:在不断变化的背景下不断发展的方法
在Web 2.0的许多副产品中,社交媒体和内容共享平台中潜在的大量图像和文本数据集讲述了人们如何生活、他们做什么以及他们关心什么。这些数据集在许多方面是不完善和有偏见的,但这些缺陷使它们与传统社会科学方法得出的数据相辅相成,因此可能对复杂决策环境中的三角测量有用。然而,在线环境是高度可变的,因此数据集不如人口普查或其他用于社会影响评估的标准数据类型可靠。在过去的十年中,我们已经创新了许多方法来部署Instagram数据集,以调查管理或开发替代方案。本文综合了三个加拿大决策背景下的工作-水电站大坝建设或拆除;堤防调整或湿地恢复;并将可再生能源整合到葡萄园景观中-举例说明我们使用Instagram应用于社会影响评估问题的一些方法,这些方法可以转移到其他社交媒体平台和环境中:主题(手动编码,机器视觉,自然语言处理/情感分析,统计分析),空间(热点映射,文化生态系统建模)和视觉(词云,显著性映射,拼贴)。最后,我们给出了该领域的一组注意事项和后续步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Sociology
Current Sociology SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Current Sociology is a fully peer-reviewed, international journal that publishes original research and innovative critical commentary both on current debates within sociology as a developing discipline, and the contribution that sociologists can make to understanding and influencing current issues arising in the development of modern societies in a globalizing world. An official journal of the International Sociological Association since 1952, Current Sociology is one of the oldest and most widely cited sociology journals in the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信