Data sharing decisions: Perceptions and intentions in healthcare

IF 3.6 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
A. Kharlamov, R. Hohmann, G. Parry
{"title":"Data sharing decisions: Perceptions and intentions in healthcare","authors":"A. Kharlamov, R. Hohmann, G. Parry","doi":"10.1002/jsc.2558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article aimed to capture and understand individual's intentions to share data, focusing on data individuals perceive as most sensitive: healthcare data. The study reviews literature related to the decision‐making process with regard to sharing personal data. The context is the UK National Health Service, and measures from literature are used to analyze individual's intention to share healthcare data. A scale is developed and applied to evaluate the decision to share healthcare data. Measurement constructs include intention to disclose, perceived protection, benefits, risk, subjective norms, and perception of use. Analysis draws on data from 129 survey respondents. Though numerous measurements are reported in literature and used in this study, two predictors dominate intention to disclose healthcare data: perceived information risk (PIR) and perceived societal benefit (PSB), and both are significant. PIR contributes negatively, whereas PSB contributes positively to predict intention. For personal healthcare, the privacy paradox applies as though risk may outweigh benefit people rarely opt out of data sharing. Individuals consciously or unconsciously consider their perception of the risk and broader benefits of data sharing. Both risk and benefit are both significant and important; perceived risk carries more weight than perceived benefits. Organizations need to develop campaigns to very clearly explain risks and benefits of personal data sharing to ensure that individuals can make truly informed decisions.","PeriodicalId":46986,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Change-Briefings in Entrepreneurial Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Change-Briefings in Entrepreneurial Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article aimed to capture and understand individual's intentions to share data, focusing on data individuals perceive as most sensitive: healthcare data. The study reviews literature related to the decision‐making process with regard to sharing personal data. The context is the UK National Health Service, and measures from literature are used to analyze individual's intention to share healthcare data. A scale is developed and applied to evaluate the decision to share healthcare data. Measurement constructs include intention to disclose, perceived protection, benefits, risk, subjective norms, and perception of use. Analysis draws on data from 129 survey respondents. Though numerous measurements are reported in literature and used in this study, two predictors dominate intention to disclose healthcare data: perceived information risk (PIR) and perceived societal benefit (PSB), and both are significant. PIR contributes negatively, whereas PSB contributes positively to predict intention. For personal healthcare, the privacy paradox applies as though risk may outweigh benefit people rarely opt out of data sharing. Individuals consciously or unconsciously consider their perception of the risk and broader benefits of data sharing. Both risk and benefit are both significant and important; perceived risk carries more weight than perceived benefits. Organizations need to develop campaigns to very clearly explain risks and benefits of personal data sharing to ensure that individuals can make truly informed decisions.
数据共享决策:医疗保健中的认知和意图
本文旨在捕捉和理解个人共享数据的意图,重点关注个人认为最敏感的数据:医疗保健数据。本研究回顾了与共享个人数据的决策过程相关的文献。背景是英国国家卫生服务,并从文献措施被用来分析个人的意图,以分享医疗保健数据。开发并应用一个量表来评估共享医疗保健数据的决策。测量结构包括披露意图、感知保护、利益、风险、主观规范和使用感知。分析采用了来自129名受访者的数据。尽管文献中报道了许多测量方法并在本研究中使用,但两个预测因素主导了医疗保健数据披露的意愿:感知信息风险(PIR)和感知社会效益(PSB),两者都很重要。PIR对意向的预测有负向作用,而PSB对意向的预测有正向作用。在个人医疗保健方面,隐私悖论适用于风险大于收益的情况——人们很少选择退出数据共享。个人有意识或无意识地考虑他们对数据共享的风险和更广泛利益的看法。风险和收益都很重要;感知到的风险比感知到的收益更重要。组织需要开展活动,非常清楚地解释个人数据共享的风险和好处,以确保个人能够做出真正明智的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.70%
发文量
70
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信