EFL Students' Language Learning Strategies at Argumentative Writing Class at UNIROW Tuban

Putri Amifalahiya Iqlima, Rissa Sofia, Risa Triassanti, Christina Innocenti Tumiar Panggabean
{"title":"EFL Students' Language Learning Strategies at Argumentative Writing Class at UNIROW Tuban","authors":"Putri Amifalahiya Iqlima, Rissa Sofia, Risa Triassanti, Christina Innocenti Tumiar Panggabean","doi":"10.29407/jetar.v8i2.20968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The focus of this research is on EFL students’ language learning strategies used in Argumentative Writing class at UNIROW Tuban. It sought to determine the students’ most frequent language learning strategies and the strategies’ distinctions between students, both male and female. The descriptive qualitative was employed as the design of research for this study. The study's participants are 15 EFL students enrolled in Argumentative Writing class from English Language Education department undergraduate program of UNIROW Tuban. The questionnaire and interview data were qualitatively examined using Oxford's (1990) theories of language learning. It was identified that there were six kinds of language learning strategies used by the students, namely memory strategies, cognitive strategies, compensation strategies, metacognitive strategies, affective strategies, and social strategies. The findings showed that in the Argumentative Writing class, both genders of students most frequently employed cognitive strategies (30,1%). Additionally, it was discovered that female students (23,5%) employed more varied language learning strategies than male students (22,5%). The cognitive strategies appear to be the finest support strategies employed in Argumentative Writing class that can overcome students' writing limitations.","PeriodicalId":53044,"journal":{"name":"Getsempena English Education Journal","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Getsempena English Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29407/jetar.v8i2.20968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The focus of this research is on EFL students’ language learning strategies used in Argumentative Writing class at UNIROW Tuban. It sought to determine the students’ most frequent language learning strategies and the strategies’ distinctions between students, both male and female. The descriptive qualitative was employed as the design of research for this study. The study's participants are 15 EFL students enrolled in Argumentative Writing class from English Language Education department undergraduate program of UNIROW Tuban. The questionnaire and interview data were qualitatively examined using Oxford's (1990) theories of language learning. It was identified that there were six kinds of language learning strategies used by the students, namely memory strategies, cognitive strategies, compensation strategies, metacognitive strategies, affective strategies, and social strategies. The findings showed that in the Argumentative Writing class, both genders of students most frequently employed cognitive strategies (30,1%). Additionally, it was discovered that female students (23,5%) employed more varied language learning strategies than male students (22,5%). The cognitive strategies appear to be the finest support strategies employed in Argumentative Writing class that can overcome students' writing limitations.
芜湖大学英语学生议论文写作课的语言学习策略
本研究的重点是在UNIROW Tuban大学的议论文写作课上使用的英语学生的语言学习策略。它试图确定学生最常用的语言学习策略,以及这些策略在男女学生之间的区别。本研究采用描述性定性方法作为研究设计。本研究的研究对象是15名来自uniow Tuban英语语言教育系本科议论文写作班的学生。问卷调查和访谈数据采用牛津(1990)语言学习理论进行定性检验。结果表明,学生使用的语言学习策略主要有六种,即记忆策略、认知策略、补偿策略、元认知策略、情感策略和社会策略。研究结果表明,在议论文写作课上,男女学生最常使用认知策略(30.1%)。此外,我们还发现女生(23.5%)使用的语言学习策略比男生(22.5%)更多样化。认知策略似乎是议论文写作课中最好的辅助策略,可以克服学生的写作局限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信