Addressing multiple perspectives in studying environmental changes in forest landscapes during the modernization period (18th–19th centuries)

The anthropocene review Pub Date : 2023-10-30 DOI:10.1177/20530196231205485

Tomasz Związek, Dominika Łuców, Joachim Popek, Marcin Klisz, Milena Obremska, Łukasz Sobechowicz, Jerzy Solon, Michał Słowiński, Paweł Przybylski, Łukasz Tyburski, Ewa Zin, Szymon Jastrzębowski, Eliza Płaczkowska, Kamil Pilch, Krzysztof Szewczyk, Agata A Konczal, Paweł Rutkowski, Dariusz Główka, Paweł Swoboda

{"title":"Addressing multiple perspectives in studying environmental changes in forest landscapes during the modernization period (18th–19th centuries)","authors":"Tomasz Związek, Dominika Łuców, Joachim Popek, Marcin Klisz, Milena Obremska, Łukasz Sobechowicz, Jerzy Solon, Michał Słowiński, Paweł Przybylski, Łukasz Tyburski, Ewa Zin, Szymon Jastrzębowski, Eliza Płaczkowska, Kamil Pilch, Krzysztof Szewczyk, Agata A Konczal, Paweł Rutkowski, Dariusz Główka, Paweł Swoboda","doi":"10.1177/20530196231205485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Combining different diverse data on human and environmental history during the Anthropocene is an extremely challenging task, particularly, if one wants to compare written or cartographic data with a whole range of environmental data recorded for more than the past 200–300 years. In this article, our objective was to demonstrate that one of the keys to facilitating syntheses for the study of forest landscape dynamics was to conduct a thorough investigation into the historical phenomena of modernization. We believe that a comprehensive understanding of the advancements in post-enlightenment thought and contextualizing them within the evolution of the state apparatus during the 18th and 19th centuries will empower us to formulate new research questions and broaden our understanding of the mutual relations between nature and humans in the past.","PeriodicalId":74943,"journal":{"name":"The anthropocene review","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The anthropocene review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20530196231205485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Combining different diverse data on human and environmental history during the Anthropocene is an extremely challenging task, particularly, if one wants to compare written or cartographic data with a whole range of environmental data recorded for more than the past 200–300 years. In this article, our objective was to demonstrate that one of the keys to facilitating syntheses for the study of forest landscape dynamics was to conduct a thorough investigation into the historical phenomena of modernization. We believe that a comprehensive understanding of the advancements in post-enlightenment thought and contextualizing them within the evolution of the state apparatus during the 18th and 19th centuries will empower us to formulate new research questions and broaden our understanding of the mutual relations between nature and humans in the past.

查看原文本刊更多论文

探讨现代化时期(18 - 19世纪)森林景观环境变化的多角度研究

将人类世期间关于人类和环境历史的不同数据结合起来是一项极具挑战性的任务，特别是如果有人想将书面或地图数据与过去200-300多年来记录的全部环境数据进行比较的话。在本文中，我们的目标是证明促进森林景观动态综合研究的关键之一是对现代化的历史现象进行彻底的调查。我们相信，全面理解后启蒙思想的进步，并将其置于18世纪和19世纪国家机器演变的背景中，将使我们能够提出新的研究问题，并扩大我们对过去自然与人类之间相互关系的理解。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

The anthropocene review

自引率

0.00%

发文量