Use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid organ transplant recipients with advanced cutaneous malignancies

Stephanie Ji, Hao Liu, Laura Pachella, Ryan D. Stephenson, Roman Groisberg, Sarah A. Weiss
{"title":"Use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid organ transplant recipients with advanced cutaneous malignancies","authors":"Stephanie Ji, Hao Liu, Laura Pachella, Ryan D. Stephenson, Roman Groisberg, Sarah A. Weiss","doi":"10.3389/frtra.2023.1284740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are standard of care therapy for patients with cutaneous malignancies, the most frequently diagnosed cancers in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. The activity and rate of allograft rejection in SOT recipients with advanced skin cancers treated with ICI is understudied. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of SOT recipients with advanced melanoma, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), and merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) who were treated with ICI. Unpublished cases from our institution and published cases from the literature were aggregated. Demographics, type of immunosuppressive therapy, type of ICI(s) administered, prior systemic therapies, tumor response to ICI, and evidence of organ rejection and/or failure were recorded. Objective response rates (ORR) and rates of graft rejection and failure are reported. Results Ninety patients were identified; four patients from our institution and 86 unique patients from a literature review. ORR to first-line ICI for the entire cohort was 41.1% (37/90). ORR by tumor type was 31% (18/58), 64.3% (18/28), and 25.0% (1/4) for melanoma, cSCC, and MCC, respectively. The rate of graft rejection was 37.8% (34/90) with 61.8% (21/34) of these cases progressing to graft failure. Number of immunosuppressive agents (0, 1, 2, or 3) was inversely associated with rate of graft failure. Conclusions In this retrospective analysis, ICIs demonstrate clinical activity in SOT recipients with cutaneous malignancies; however, the rate of graft rejection is high. Treatment plans should be individualized through thorough interdisciplinary discussion. Immunosuppressive modifications may be considered prior to starting treatment, but when feasible, enrollment on clinical trials is preferred.","PeriodicalId":483606,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Transplantation","volume":"431 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frtra.2023.1284740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are standard of care therapy for patients with cutaneous malignancies, the most frequently diagnosed cancers in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. The activity and rate of allograft rejection in SOT recipients with advanced skin cancers treated with ICI is understudied. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of SOT recipients with advanced melanoma, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), and merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) who were treated with ICI. Unpublished cases from our institution and published cases from the literature were aggregated. Demographics, type of immunosuppressive therapy, type of ICI(s) administered, prior systemic therapies, tumor response to ICI, and evidence of organ rejection and/or failure were recorded. Objective response rates (ORR) and rates of graft rejection and failure are reported. Results Ninety patients were identified; four patients from our institution and 86 unique patients from a literature review. ORR to first-line ICI for the entire cohort was 41.1% (37/90). ORR by tumor type was 31% (18/58), 64.3% (18/28), and 25.0% (1/4) for melanoma, cSCC, and MCC, respectively. The rate of graft rejection was 37.8% (34/90) with 61.8% (21/34) of these cases progressing to graft failure. Number of immunosuppressive agents (0, 1, 2, or 3) was inversely associated with rate of graft failure. Conclusions In this retrospective analysis, ICIs demonstrate clinical activity in SOT recipients with cutaneous malignancies; however, the rate of graft rejection is high. Treatment plans should be individualized through thorough interdisciplinary discussion. Immunosuppressive modifications may be considered prior to starting treatment, but when feasible, enrollment on clinical trials is preferred.
免疫检查点抑制剂在晚期皮肤恶性肿瘤实体器官移植受者中的应用
背景免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)是皮肤恶性肿瘤患者的标准护理治疗,皮肤恶性肿瘤是实体器官移植(SOT)受者中最常见的诊断癌症。急性SOT患者接受ICI治疗的晚期皮肤癌患者的同种异体移植排斥反应的活性和比率尚未得到充分研究。方法:回顾性分析采用ICI治疗的晚期黑色素瘤、皮肤鳞状细胞癌(cSCC)和默克尔细胞癌(MCC) SOT患者。汇总本机构未发表的病例和文献中已发表的病例。记录人口统计学、免疫抑制治疗类型、使用ICI的类型、既往全身治疗、肿瘤对ICI的反应以及器官排斥和/或衰竭的证据。客观反应率(ORR)和移植排斥和失败率的报道。结果共确诊90例;来自我们机构的4名患者和来自文献综述的86名独特患者。整个队列到一线ICI的ORR为41.1%(37/90)。按肿瘤类型划分,黑素瘤、cSCC和MCC的ORR分别为31%(18/58)、64.3%(18/28)和25.0%(1/4)。排异率为37.8%(34/90),其中61.8%(21/34)进展为移植物衰竭。免疫抑制剂的数量(0、1、2或3)与移植物失败率呈负相关。结论:在这项回顾性分析中,ICIs在伴有皮肤恶性肿瘤的SOT受者中显示出临床活性;然而,移植排斥反应的发生率很高。治疗方案应通过全面的跨学科讨论来个性化。在开始治疗之前可以考虑免疫抑制修饰,但在可行的情况下,首选临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信