Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Hepatitis B Virus Infection Exhibited Favorable Survival from Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
{"title":"Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Hepatitis B Virus Infection Exhibited Favorable Survival from Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Qi Du, Jia Yuan, Zhenggang Ren","doi":"10.1159/000534446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated effectiveness for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the discrepancy in the efficacy of ICIs in HCC patients with distinct etiologies has not been systematically validated. Methods PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, clinicaltrials.gov and abstracts from ASCO and ESMO conferences were searched for eligible trials that explored the impact of etiology factor on the ICI treatment in HCC patients. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), as well as the pooled odds ratio (OR) of objective response rate (ORR) were calculated with stratification of hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and nonviral subgroup, and the heterogeneity between different etiological subgroup were assessed by using an interaction test. Results Eight eligible studies with a total of 5646 patients were identified from searching published articles and conference abstracts. ICI therapies were associated with significantly prolonged OS with the pooled HRs of 0.78 (95%CI 0.73-0.84, p < 0.001), 0.71 (95%CI 0.65-0.79, p < 0.001), 0.80 (95%CI 0.69-0.93, p = 0.003) and 0.87 (95%CI 0.77-0.97, p = 0.011) for the whole population, HBV subgroup, HCV subgroup and non-viral subgroup, respectively. In addition, this analysis reported a significant PFS improvement with ICI therapies with HRs of 0.78 (p = 0.004), 0.53 (p < 0.001), 0.65 (p = 0.011) and 0.81 (p = 0.107) for whole population, HBV, HCV and nonviral subgroup, respectively. The HBV-related HCC patients showed the more distinctive HRs for OS and PFS than other etiology subgroups, and this difference was significant in PFS (p for heterogeneity = 0.001) and there was a tendency of significance in OS (p for heterogeneity = 0.079). Furthermore, the ORR advantages of ICI therapies over control were also confirmed with the pooled ORs of 3.62 (p < 0.001), 3.84 (p < 0.001), 3.05 (p < 0.001) and 2.99 (p < 0.001) for whole population, HBV, HCV and nonviral subgroup, respectively (p for heterogeneity = 0.743). Conclusions ICI therapies significantly improve OS, PFS and ORR for HCC patients with different etiologies. HBV-related HCC patients could be the highlighted population to benefit from ICI treatment.","PeriodicalId":18156,"journal":{"name":"Liver Cancer","volume":"433 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534446","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated effectiveness for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the discrepancy in the efficacy of ICIs in HCC patients with distinct etiologies has not been systematically validated. Methods PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, clinicaltrials.gov and abstracts from ASCO and ESMO conferences were searched for eligible trials that explored the impact of etiology factor on the ICI treatment in HCC patients. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), as well as the pooled odds ratio (OR) of objective response rate (ORR) were calculated with stratification of hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and nonviral subgroup, and the heterogeneity between different etiological subgroup were assessed by using an interaction test. Results Eight eligible studies with a total of 5646 patients were identified from searching published articles and conference abstracts. ICI therapies were associated with significantly prolonged OS with the pooled HRs of 0.78 (95%CI 0.73-0.84, p < 0.001), 0.71 (95%CI 0.65-0.79, p < 0.001), 0.80 (95%CI 0.69-0.93, p = 0.003) and 0.87 (95%CI 0.77-0.97, p = 0.011) for the whole population, HBV subgroup, HCV subgroup and non-viral subgroup, respectively. In addition, this analysis reported a significant PFS improvement with ICI therapies with HRs of 0.78 (p = 0.004), 0.53 (p < 0.001), 0.65 (p = 0.011) and 0.81 (p = 0.107) for whole population, HBV, HCV and nonviral subgroup, respectively. The HBV-related HCC patients showed the more distinctive HRs for OS and PFS than other etiology subgroups, and this difference was significant in PFS (p for heterogeneity = 0.001) and there was a tendency of significance in OS (p for heterogeneity = 0.079). Furthermore, the ORR advantages of ICI therapies over control were also confirmed with the pooled ORs of 3.62 (p < 0.001), 3.84 (p < 0.001), 3.05 (p < 0.001) and 2.99 (p < 0.001) for whole population, HBV, HCV and nonviral subgroup, respectively (p for heterogeneity = 0.743). Conclusions ICI therapies significantly improve OS, PFS and ORR for HCC patients with different etiologies. HBV-related HCC patients could be the highlighted population to benefit from ICI treatment.
期刊介绍:
Liver Cancer is a journal that serves the international community of researchers and clinicians by providing a platform for research results related to the causes, mechanisms, and therapy of liver cancer. It focuses on molecular carcinogenesis, prevention, surveillance, diagnosis, and treatment, including molecular targeted therapy. The journal publishes clinical and translational research in the field of liver cancer in both humans and experimental models. It publishes original and review articles and has an Impact Factor of 13.8. The journal is indexed and abstracted in various platforms including PubMed, PubMed Central, Web of Science, Science Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded, Google Scholar, DOAJ, Chemical Abstracts Service, Scopus, Embase, Pathway Studio, and WorldCat.