Protests in Macao Under Chinese Sovereignty: Against the State or for the State?

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES
Ying-ho Kwong, Mathew Y. H. Wong
{"title":"Protests in Macao Under Chinese Sovereignty: Against the State or for the State?","authors":"Ying-ho Kwong, Mathew Y. H. Wong","doi":"10.1080/00472336.2023.2270585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe existing literature on contentious politics has long centred on “state-challenging protests,” referring to resistance that denies state legitimacy. However, the implications of “state-engaging protests,” referring to protests that seek state assistance in what are essentially private disputes rather than challenging state legitimacy, have yet to be thoroughly explored. By analysing 2,364 protests in Macao, this study compares the trends and characteristics of protests from 2000 to 2021. The results indicate that state-challenging protests that targeted the Macao government exceeded state-engaging ones but state-engaging protests that targeted the mainland Chinese authorities exceeded state-challenging ones. The conclusion strongly supports the thesis that identity affiliation affects the type of protests: citizens with a strong local Macao identity tend to be involved more in state-engaging protests, seeking state assistance. However, citizens with a strong Chinese national identity tend to engage more in state-challenging protests to criticise the local government. These findings provide a useful comparative perspective on the causes of state-challenging and state-engaging protests.Key Words: ChinaidentityMacaostate-challenging protestsstate-engaging protests AcknowledgementsThe authors are grateful to the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Contemporary Asia and the journal’s anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback and criticisms on earlier drafts of this article. All mistakes are the responsibility of the authors.Notes1 Protests saw another peak in 2020 with demands for subsidies by different sectors (such as the casino sector and tourism) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Since Macao did not have gathering restrictions, there were no restrictions on protest.2 The dependent variables are measured as categorical dummy variables (0/1), and therefore the models have the same number of observations. This approach takes full advantage of the data over splitting the sample into groups, which will also make the estimation unreliable for the categories with a small N.","PeriodicalId":47420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Asia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2023.2270585","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractThe existing literature on contentious politics has long centred on “state-challenging protests,” referring to resistance that denies state legitimacy. However, the implications of “state-engaging protests,” referring to protests that seek state assistance in what are essentially private disputes rather than challenging state legitimacy, have yet to be thoroughly explored. By analysing 2,364 protests in Macao, this study compares the trends and characteristics of protests from 2000 to 2021. The results indicate that state-challenging protests that targeted the Macao government exceeded state-engaging ones but state-engaging protests that targeted the mainland Chinese authorities exceeded state-challenging ones. The conclusion strongly supports the thesis that identity affiliation affects the type of protests: citizens with a strong local Macao identity tend to be involved more in state-engaging protests, seeking state assistance. However, citizens with a strong Chinese national identity tend to engage more in state-challenging protests to criticise the local government. These findings provide a useful comparative perspective on the causes of state-challenging and state-engaging protests.Key Words: ChinaidentityMacaostate-challenging protestsstate-engaging protests AcknowledgementsThe authors are grateful to the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Contemporary Asia and the journal’s anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback and criticisms on earlier drafts of this article. All mistakes are the responsibility of the authors.Notes1 Protests saw another peak in 2020 with demands for subsidies by different sectors (such as the casino sector and tourism) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Since Macao did not have gathering restrictions, there were no restrictions on protest.2 The dependent variables are measured as categorical dummy variables (0/1), and therefore the models have the same number of observations. This approach takes full advantage of the data over splitting the sample into groups, which will also make the estimation unreliable for the categories with a small N.
中国主权下的澳门抗议:反对国家还是支持国家?
摘要关于争议性政治的现有文献长期以来一直集中在“挑战国家的抗议”上,指的是否认国家合法性的抵抗。然而,“政府参与的抗议”指的是在本质上是私人纠纷而不是挑战国家合法性的抗议活动中寻求国家援助,其含义尚未得到彻底探讨。通过分析澳门2364起抗议活动,本研究比较了2000年至2021年抗议活动的趋势和特征。结果表明,针对澳门政府的挑战国家的抗议活动超过了参与国家的抗议活动,而针对中国大陆当局的参与国家的抗议活动超过了挑战国家的抗议活动。结论有力地支持了认同归属影响抗议类型的论点:具有强烈澳门本地认同的公民更倾向于参与政府参与的抗议活动,寻求国家援助。然而,具有强烈中国民族认同感的公民倾向于更多地参与挑战国家的抗议活动,批评地方政府。这些发现提供了一个有用的比较视角来看待挑战国家和参与国家的抗议活动的原因。关键词:中国身份澳门挑战国家的抗议参与国家的抗议致谢作者感谢《当代亚洲杂志》主编和匿名审稿人对本文早期草稿的建设性反馈和批评。所有错误由作者负责。注1 2020年,抗议活动再次达到高峰,在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,不同行业(如赌场和旅游业)要求补贴。由于澳门没有集会限制,所以对抗议活动没有限制因变量被测量为分类虚拟变量(0/1),因此模型具有相同数量的观测值。这种方法充分利用了数据,而不是将样本分成几组,这也会使具有小N的类别的估计不可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contemporary Asia is an established refereed publication, it appears quarterly and has done so since 1970. When the journal was established, it was conceived as providing an alternative to mainstream perspectives on contemporary Asian issues. The journal maintains this tradition and seeks to publish articles that deal with the broad problems of economic, political and social development of Asia. Articles on economic development issues, political economy, agriculture, planning, the working class, people"s movements, politics and power, imperialism and empire, international financial institutions, the environment, and economic history are especially welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信